Fucking scumbags.
Jo Cox wanted Brexit according to the PM.
The same woman murdered by a man who shouted "Britain's first!"
No doubt the media will ignore it.
This is exactly what Tories think of us.
Fucking scumbags.
Jo Cox wanted Brexit according to the PM.
The same woman murdered by a man who shouted "Britain's first!"
No doubt the media will ignore it.
A sociopath is a term used to describe someone who has antisocial personality disorder (ASPD). People with ASPD can't understand others' feelings. They'll often break rules or make impulsive decisions without feeling guilty for the harm they cause.
I have said this all along he is marmite, he has a narrow base of supporters similar to Trump who adore him. They could literally photo him but naked hanging out the back of some bird and they wouldn't care, it would be just laughed off as Ho ho hee hee good old Boris, he's such a charmer with ladies. He is turning this country into a laughing stock I don't remember in my lifetime any UK PM where media outlets from other countries have ceremoniously waded in and said he needs to get the boot.
He's egging people on to commit violent acts just as that orange face **** is doing over the pond. When it occurs he'll happily deny he has.The guy is a complete scumbag. We all know that. We all knew that but he was still allowed to be pm. The country is in a very bad place and that twat knows exactly what he's doing and he knows exactly who his target audience are. He's a danger
He's egging people on to commit violent acts just as that orange face **** is doing over the pond. When it occurs he'll happily deny he has.
Pure sociopathic ****.
So - the DCMS said the Busty Blonde IT teacher that Johnson showered with public money had a business that qualified because it was UK based and has a UK number. You can call Hacker House who's owner Jennifer Acuri got at least £126k worth of public money out of Brains in his dick Johnson ( and went on 3 overseas trade missions with ) on the London number - 020 8123 1379 - Its anwsered by a lovely lady in California................
Well yes the Remain vote is likely to remain at about 50%. But it’s shared between labour, the Lib Dem’s and the SNP in Scotland. Unless the Lib Dem vote collapses neither they or Labour has much of a chance of winning a majority. And the chances of the Lib Dem’s vote collapsing have reduced as a result of the Brexit “policy” that Labour have just adopted. But between them they ought to win enough seats for Labour to form a minority government.
The only thing stopping that from happening is if Johnson can sweep up those voters who are currently leaning towards the Bxp. If he can push the Tory vote above 40%. And those are the voters who are most likely to look favourably on his behaviour. The ones that are appalled have already left him.
Dont think she is but the way the murder of a colleague is used to push a political agenda and point is fucking disgusting.
Jo Cox's husband agrees as well and he has rounded on anyone using her good name, regardless of what side of the debate they are on.
These people are getting death threats. The death threats reflect the very emotive language used by the prime minister. The context is that one of their colleagues has been murdered. The only point I thought they were trying to make is that the Prime Minister’s language made it more likely, not less, that another psychopath would commit the murder of another MP. So they asked him to moderate his language.
Which he refused to do.
These people are getting death threats. The death threats reflect the very emotive language used by the prime minister. The context is that one of their colleagues has been murdered. The only point I thought they were trying to make is that the Prime Minister’s language made it more likely, not less, that another psychopath would commit the murder of another MP. So they asked him to moderate his language.
Which he refused to do.
Do you not agree that it is difficult to discuss a divisive issue without anger coming into it? Linking what one person says and how another (unlinked) person acts is tenuous, even if it might be despicable. These people will use any words or phrases spoken by advocates of their cause (both sides) whether it be an individual or media outlet, so any tenuous link can be achieved but death threats are a crime and should be investigated accordingly by independent bodies, not used as a political tool. Those MPs were understandably angry but were incorrect to attribute these threats directly to one single person without proper investigation and the speaker should have intervened.These people are getting death threats.
The death threats reflect the very emotive language used by the prime minister.
The context is that one of their colleagues has been murdered. The only point I thought they were trying to make is that the Prime Minister’s language made it more likely, not less, that another psychopath would commit the murder of another MP. So they asked him to moderate his language.
Which he refused to do.