Another new Brexit thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ric
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
kevin horlocks wand said:
Corbyn doesn’t like this new deal it seems unfortunately

He didn’t like the previous withdrawal agreement either due to the backstop. As the problem with the backstop as it risks keeping the uk in the single market and customs union indefinitely.

Perhaps whilst opposing the deal cos it’s the Tories , he should have read it and he should have listened to what his brexit Secretary at the time on labours policy which was to keep the uk in a permanent customs union and the single market.

Doh.

Anyway here comes the Scottish Jabba.
Click to expand...

He admitted he never read May's deal so let's assume he won't read this one.

All Corbyn could say yesterday was how the UK will turn into a poundshop.

His contribution before that was to get in power, negotiate 'a deal' and then let everyone decide what to do next.

He is basically an empty shell on this whole issue.
 
George Hannah said:
ISE or IZE
The O.E.D. favours universal ize, arguing that the suffix is always in its origin either Greek or Latin and in both languages it is spelt with a z. Other authorities, including most English printers, recommend universal ise. Fowler stands between these two opinions. He points out that the O.E.D.'s advice over-simplifies the problem, since there are some verbs (e.g. advertise, comprise, despise, exercise and surmise) which are never spelt ize in this country. On the other hand, he says " the difficulty of remembering which these ise verbs are is the only reason for making ise universal, and the sacrifice of significance to ease does not seem justified ".
The ABC of Plain Words, by Sir Ernest Gowers, HMSO 1951
Click to expand...

Interesting. My understanding was that IZE is the historically correct spelling and in many instances Z's have become S's as spelling has evolved away the Greek / Latin origins of most words. Much of this evolution is where latin has become french and the french like an s over a z. Where as zee germans like a z.

My spelling and typing is dreadful so I don't tend to worry about it.
 
Why is parliament bothering to debate this back of a fag packet proposal, its ludicrous, I mean getting rid of the back stop which was put in place to avoid a hard borderby putting in 2 more hard borders 5-10 away from the border is not a solution. It's mind blowing stupid and ignorant and total lack of respect and understanding of what the Good Friday Agreement is all about. It's not even the emperors new clothes its nonsense on the same level of Trump wanting to build a moat around the Mexican border fill it with snakes and aligaters and electric fence around wall.
 
Mike D said:
Why is parliament bothering to debate this back of a fag packet proposal, its ludicrous, I mean getting rid of the back stop which was put in place to avoid a hard borderby putting in 2 more hard borders 5-10 away from the border is not a solution. It's mind blowing stupid and ignorant and total lack of respect and understanding of what the Good Friday Agreement is all about. It's not even the emperors new clothes its nonsense on the same level of Trump wanting to build a moat around the Mexican border fill it with snakes and aligaters and electric fence around wall.
Click to expand...

Well if you recall parliament rejected the backstop 3 times so he has to come with something different
 
We're saved from economic collapse thanks to Jason Donovan selling well in North Korea.

Vote Bojo!
 
Mike D said:
Why is parliament bothering to debate this back of a fag packet proposal, its ludicrous, I mean getting rid of the back stop which was put in place to avoid a hard borderby putting in 2 more hard borders 5-10 away from the border is not a solution. It's mind blowing stupid and ignorant and total lack of respect and understanding of what the Good Friday Agreement is all about. It's not even the emperors new clothes its nonsense on the same level of Trump wanting to build a moat around the Mexican border fill it with snakes and aligaters and electric fence around wall.
Click to expand...
Some people want Brexit so badly they’ll lap up any old shit.
 
Last edited:
Mike D said:
Why is parliament bothering to debate this back of a fag packet proposal, its ludicrous, I mean getting rid of the back stop which was put in place to avoid a hard borderby putting in 2 more hard borders 5-10 away from the border is not a solution. It's mind blowing stupid and ignorant and total lack of respect and understanding of what the Good Friday Agreement is all about. It's not even the emperors new clothes its nonsense on the same level of Trump wanting to build a moat around the Mexican border fill it with snakes and aligaters and electric fence around wall.
Click to expand...

In fairness Trump’s plan is doable. It also sounds fun in a ‘Bond villain’ sort of way. Although not fun if you are trying to swim the moat obviously.
 
kevin horlocks wand said:
Well if you recall parliament rejected the backstop 3 times so he has to come with something different
Click to expand...

Something my 12 year could have come up with, perhaps it was one of JRM's kids who drew it up on a piece of paper with crayons. Its mind numbling stupid the fat lying oaf is even telling people that this solution won't need any new buildings WTF!!!!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top