In terms of votes, Labour will be crucial here I think. If Corbyn is sending out messages that they won't back it, then we could be back to square one. That's his and Labour's right of course but you have to wonder what their motivation is. If they think it's a shit deal, fine, but could Labour get a better one out of the EU if they won an election? That's what I'd be asking. Or is it just party politics and they can't be seen to vote for anything negotiated by a Tory PM? Obviously that one works both ways of course and if it was a Labour PM getting a deal, I'm sure a lot of Tories would be against it.
I just think Corbyn is playing a dangerous game here and in recommending that his MPs scupper the deal, he could be scuppering his own chances of becoming PM as well as inadvertently putting No Deal back on the table. Let's also remember that he's voted against the EU virtually all his political life so he's hardly a Remainer at heart.
Surprised you’ve not mentioned this before.
Tbf brexit does mean brexitSurprised you’ve not mentioned this before.
No point.
Shit or get off the pot time on Saturday.
Time to show the country who they really are and what they really want.
Tbf brexit does mean brexit
A leaver who sees a chance at a power grab but he has ruined that chance by refusing a GE and now with a deal on the table they said was impossible they look pretty fucking stupid.
The electorate will see on Saturday what some of them are all about and i hope they fuck every single one of them out at the next GE.
Rees Most is gerrymandering parliament.Entirely predictable. They don’t want those pesky elected MPs asking awkward questions.
Don’t think they will get away with it.
As for those praising Johnson for getting a deal. Stop posting you’re embarrassing yourselves. This deal has been available all along.
Rees Most is gerrymandering parliament.
Bercow just told him as chair he can decide how long the debates can last. The SNP has noted their MP's can't get from their constuancies in time for it.
Moggie also didn't give the house notice of the paper he was about to bring. Some MPs have accuses him of mocking them as he walked into parliament waving the motion papers over his head.
Rees Most is gerrymandering parliament.
Bercow just told him as chair he can decide how long the debates can last. The SNP has noted their MP's can't get from their constuancies in time for it.
Moggie also didn't give the house notice of the paper he was about to bring. Some MPs have accuses him of mocking them as he walked into parliament waving the motion papers over his head.
In terms of votes, Labour will be crucial here I think. If Corbyn is sending out messages that they won't back it, then we could be back to square one. That's his and Labour's right of course but you have to wonder what their motivation is. If they think it's a shit deal, fine, but could Labour get a better one out of the EU if they won an election? That's what I'd be asking. Or is it just party politics and they can't be seen to vote for anything negotiated by a Tory PM? Obviously that one works both ways of course and if it was a Labour PM getting a deal, I'm sure a lot of Tories would be against it.
I just think Corbyn is playing a dangerous game here and in recommending that his MPs scupper the deal, he could be scuppering his own chances of becoming PM as well as inadvertently putting No Deal back on the table. Let's also remember that he's voted against the EU virtually all his political life so he's hardly a Remainer at heart and as such I'm not even sure he's in favour of a second referendum.
I'm trying to work out which character out of Jeeves and Wooster he idolises.The EU haven’t moved, this was one of their initial proposals, Johnson’s team weren’t in negotiations until the last fortnight when they became desperate and you’re still a nincompoop.
I thought you meant if the deal was voted down again.
Reported on James O’Brien as labours position.Jezzer didn't even mention a second referendum in his comments just now, there is no HoC majority for another 6 month delay and even rumours that the EU will not allow any extension post Oct 31.
Not sure how that works?
HoC can only vote yes or no. That would have to be 2 things - vote y or n on teh deal and if n then vote again y or n on no deal. The Ben act requires a deal to be passed so any attempt to rail road this would just result in both proposals being voted down and then Ben act comes in and we have an extension.
Makes a mockery of the HoC to be honest and makes it look like he has no intention to take it forward as a serious proposal.
I missed all that as wellDamn what did I miss? Can you reload the offensive exchanges using false usernames ?
The House voted it through Tolm?Bbbut, they said it was impossible?