Another new Brexit thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ric
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
What's hilarious is that you have staunch Remainers on here wanking off over Corbyn despite the fact he's been anti-EU for decades, and has voted against the EU on numerous occasions, yet the public get one chance to vote on something EU related (ok, twice if you happen to be old enough) and the same posters denounce them as being thick or whatever for daring to vote the same way Corbyn has been voting since the 1970's!
Please remember us staunch remainers who consider Corbyn to be as much use as tits on a fish.
 
You could have as many options as you like, as long as remain is one then i am pretty confident it would win. Its clearly the best option so why would you not include it - how would that be democratic?
Not as simple as that mate. We've no idea what sort of remain we are voting for. Is it hard remain, remain with a 'deal', remain with veto and rebate intact etc. I'm not saying Remainers are thick or racist, just that we'd need to know what sort of remain it is before we could vote on it.
 
Yeah they want this rammed through...but it’s up to the E27 leaders not the EU.

Also Parliament needs to pass the European Withdrawal Agreement Act to give any agreed deal legal force. It can’t be done in the time left.
So, where do you see that all heading then?....
 
Yeah they want this rammed through...but it’s up to the E27 leaders not the EU.

Also Parliament needs to pass the European Withdrawal Agreement Act to give any agreed deal legal force. It can’t be done in the time left.

Mogg is convinced it can.
 
Not quite, listen to the full interview with juncker, he's quite ambiguous towards the end

Put's to an end though any potential to blame the eu on this one in the GE campaign if it doesn't cross the line so that leaves the DUP, parliament and the rebellion extinction - pound is not going to like this very much
 
So, where do you see that all heading then?....

Personally? anywhere.

this makes an outright revoke now just as likely as no-deal.

We know we can unilaterally revoke article 50.

If the pressure to get this deal through, removes an extension, and a 2nd ref. then the choice is, deal, no-deal or revoke.

I'd bet on revoke over no deal, if this doesnt pass
 
Eu have ruled out an extension ......

Yeah they want this rammed through...but it’s up to the E27 leaders not the EU.

Also Parliament needs to pass the European Withdrawal Agreement Act to give any agreed deal legal force. It can’t be done in the time left.

Junker ruled out an extension because "If we have a deal we have a deal and there is no need for prolongation."

Which is pretty much meaningless as if the EU27 or parliament don't accept it, then we don't have a deal...so an extension is back on the table presumably.


Not really a convincing statement, but I suspect the main aim was to get the "Junker says there will be no extension" headlines to add some pressure to getting this deal through.
 
Put's to an end though any potential to blame the eu on this one in the GE campaign if it doesn't cross the line so that leaves the DUP, parliament and the rebellion extinction - pound is not going to like this very much
I wouldn't bet against it. I've been told multiple times on here the EU are preventing us from leaving by the usual suspects on here despite they'd already given us a deal.
People will lap up what they're told.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top