And their former colleagues still cherish No Deal.
It’ll be used as a strategy still in negotiations.Little doubt its their wet dream but having a wet dream doesnt always make it a reality.
I should know ;-)
If this briefing paper on the WA from the Bruges Group of eurosceptics is halfway accurate even the leavers appear to have been sold a pig in a poke.I don't think people fully understand how shit this deal is. If this goes through we have just over 12 months to sort out a trade deal or everything falls away. 12 months in which we will get screwed by the EU and come out the other end a much poorer nation. The idea the tories are nearly home and dry is way far of the mark. This is just the begging of brexit and it gets really shit from here on - the next stage is where the real damage will be done.
so you anticipate these rights being undermined once this time has passed if the deal is ratified?The deal provides for alignment for 14 months - then nothing. The May deal had a stronger commitment to ongoing regulatory alignment. Therefore the BoJo deal sets up to weaken the regulatory alignment and do something else i.e. deregulate. As a result you would expect the FTA to be much more difficult to do or be much more limited in scope.
I don't *think* it will either mate.
But if I'm a labour MP sat on the fence against no deal but for a deal; it doesn't inspire me with confidence seeing Gove advertise it as an opportunity to achieve no deal to extremists
I don't disagree with that. I didn't say the Tories would inevitably form the next government, merely that they would necessarily - IMO - be the biggest party. I cannot see how that could not be true.Opinion polls are unreliable at best and that was proven at the last election when May lost her majority. Labour might not be the largest party but they may be large enough to form a coalition with some of the rest. A lot of this hinges on tomorrow if Johnson win's their would be very few willing to bet against him winning an election.
It’ll be used as a strategy still in negotiations.
Depending on the make up of your next government, who knows where that’ll lead.
Not sure that's got anything to do with my point but okay lmaoAs I said yesterday, time to shit or get off the pot for them all.
All eyes on them tomorrow.
Not sure that's got anything to do with my point but okay lmao
Corbyn said he would vote against it 26 minutes before the amendments were made available...Has Corbyn or any other Opposition party leader given their opinion?
Has Corbyn or any other Opposition party leader given their opinion?
That's your naivety right there.
It is too much to expect all MPs to respect the majorities in their constituencies and ignore the threats of de-selection unless they toe the party line (if the two are not aligned)?It does and it doesnt.
Sure i see your point and its party politics.
Many will tow the party and whip line and do as they are told.
Some will say fuck it i want a deal.
Its down to them all tomorrow, all 650 of them to do what they feel is right and to either shit or get off the pot.
Have I really heard right that MP's are asking IPSA to cover childcare costs for them because they're having to sit on a Saturday?