If nothing existed, there would be, well, 'nothing' to explain.

No it doesn’t:
You, like Krauss, need to move on. His crude reductionism was wholly discredited when it was first aired not least by his fellow atheist physicists. Not that such things matter much inside the Dawkins funded cyber echo chambers.
https://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/25/...e-from-nothing-by-lawrence-m-krauss.html?_r=4
So very true.
not just 'true' - 'very true' - only in the world of the true believer can an absolute be qualified
 
Last edited:
You, like Krauss, need to move on. His crude reductionism was wholly discredited when it was first aired not least by his fellow atheist physicists. Not that such things matter much inside the Dawkins funded cyber echo chambers.
https://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/25/books/review/a-universe-from-nothing-by-lawrence-m-krauss.html


not just 'true' - 'very true' - only in the world of the true believer can an absolute be qualified

You keep trying to self verify your desperate need to feel you’re on the one true path George. Bless.

You don’t make threads as good as Ship of Fools anymore though. This is all rather passé.

As for me needing to ‘move on’, I guess the irony is lost on you JC.
 
You keep trying to self verify your desperate need to feel you’re on the one true path George. Bless. You don’t make threads as good as Ship of Fools anymore though. This is all rather passé. As for me needing to ‘move on’, I guess the irony is lost on you JC.
Still time to disembark Sooty, the lighthouse of reason is your guide.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.