Epstein / Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor / Maxwell

  • Thread starter Thread starter mat
  • Start date Start date
Can’t even rely on Royal appointees to cover for him now.
Said he stayed with the New York consul general in 2001 when Giuffre claimed she was abused at Epstein’s house in NY.
The consul general says he has no memory of PA staying with him and that there is no mention in any of the official records.
Meanwhile at the time in 2001 the press said he was staying with his pal, Epstein.
 
We all know he is a twat.

But is he saying here if he wasn't married he would be a nonce?




Vile fucker anyway, up there with hopkins on the levels of twattery
 
happy daze said:
Oh well that's it then must be guilty,thing is we don't know any of us and a judge and jury would be best placed to decide.

Still whilst we have the bluemoon court why would we need a system of law?
Click to expand...
Calm yer tits,he said he doesn't do pda's and he doesn't sweat,clearly he lied about both of them,as for the rest,i don't know
 
Could you imagine if a family on the local estate had proven and undeniable links to at least two separate paedophiles? They'd be hounded out and their house left covered in graffiti and boarded up.
Yet somehow the family Windsor don't seem to be subject to this type of summary justice.
 
jacko74 said:
Could you imagine if a family on the local estate had proven and undeniable links to at least two separate paedophiles? They'd be hounded out and their house left covered in graffiti and boarded up.
Yet somehow the family Windsor don't seem to be subject to this type of summary justice.
Click to expand...

Nobody should be subject to that kind of 'justice'.
 
Mazzarelli's Swiss Cheese said:
Just thought I'd throw it out there that this appears to be a bit of a trial by media. I'm not saying he's done nowt wrong, but innocent until proven guilty seems to have gone out the window. Largely it seems because of jealousy at his position of privilege, and the assumption that trial by tabloid is suitable for the rich and famous.
Click to expand...

It's an interesting point, as you say he hasn't been proven guilty of anything so there is an element of trial by media about this... I would counter that by looking at how he conducted himself during the interview (which he willingly took part in), he showed no empathy towards the victims and only seemed concerned at how his relationship with Epstein had impacted on the Royal family.

The needless and quite frankly embarrassing excuses (pizza express, sweating or not sweating etc) were laughable and ultimately he lost his official duties (whatever they were) due to being a liability who brought embarrassment on the Royal family and can't be trusted to represent the monarchy in a manner expected of someone in that position. It probably didn't help that by all accounts he ignored his advisors and went ahead with the interview against their better judgement. Had he been in a high profile position within government etc and conducted himself in this way its likely the end result would have been the same.

Media scrutiny certainly contributed to the decision for him to step down, but he chose to give that interview and had he handled it differently it would have been forgotten already.
 
jacko74 said:
Could you imagine if a family on the local estate had proven and undeniable links to at least two separate paedophiles? They'd be hounded out and their house left covered in graffiti and boarded up.
Yet somehow the family Windsor don't seem to be subject to this type of summary justice.
Click to expand...
Of course they aren't,he has been sacked effectively and has lost his money from us,the next bit is maybe being grilled by the FBI,if there is justice to be had he will get it the right way,when you start hounding families you catch innocent people in the net
 
urban genie said:
Wow what?

You go on threads not making any contribution but some sarcastic remark
Or
Go on a thread with a request to the mods to merge it.

That is your raison d'etre on his forum and you do it very well.

You should be proud of your skill set.
Click to expand...
Just made an innocent suggestion to clean up the forum a bit.

No need to have a go.

Apologies for upsetting you x
 
Banned Tosspot said:
Just made an innocent suggestion to clean up the forum a bit.

No need to have a go.

Apologies for upsetting you x
Click to expand...

I am not upset, don't worry about it, the forum has seems stagnent new post wise at the minute and didn't want a toby young discussion cloggin up the andrew noncery discussion up.

This thread will be on page two by midnight anyway
 
urban genie said:
We all know he is a twat.

But is he saying here if he wasn't married he would be a nonce?




Vile fucker anyway, up there with hopkins on the levels of twattery
Click to expand...


Toby Young in wanting attention shocker.

He's drops off the radar then is allowed to write complete antagonist bollocks where he gets invited on to the rolling news channels. Gets found out then disappears for a few months. Then repeats...
 
karen7 said:
Calm yer tits,he said he doesn't do pda's and he doesn't sweat,clearly he lied about both of them,as for the rest,i don't know
Click to expand...
Fair enough,there was a thread recently though about miscarriages of justice and I thought well that's a waste of time considering how some on here perceive justice.
I don't like Andrew he's an arrogant entitled oaf IMO,however Prince or pauper guilt or innocence should be determined by a properly convened court of law and I get the feeling the media have smelt blood and want the kill.

If he is ever found guilty he should receive the same sentence as anyone else.
 
happy daze said:
Fair enough,there was a thread recently though about miscarriages of justice and I thought well that's a waste of time considering how some on here perceive justice.
I don't like Andrew he's an arrogant entitled oaf IMO,however Prince or pauper guilt or innocence should be determined by a properly convened court of law and I get the feeling the media have smelt blood and want the kill.

If he is ever found guilty he should receive the same sentence as anyone else.
Click to expand...
The trouble with him is that he has never been liked by the media,he has also sailed close to the wind on some dodgy deal making and is seen as a freeloader,you are right the media smell blood but i don't think he is getting it worse than he deserves,the fact checking on his interview is not really supporting what he said,i think he has dug himself in deeper now,all that aside i don't have an opinion on whether he has broken the law,it'll come out eventually
 
The sad thing would be if the media coverage to date ends up sparing him from justice by making a fair trial impossible. Probably have to go to the Amazon rainforest or the north pole to find unbiased jurors. :-(
 
karen7 said:
The trouble with him is that he has NEVER been liked by the media..
Click to expand...

Not really true Karen. In the early 80's the media loved him, around the time of his marriage to Sarah Ferguson, he returned from the Falklands a war hero, and had the tag Randy Andy, which was an affectionate nickname in those days. He could do no wrong, whereas his brother Charles was perceived as an old fuddy duddy with his new wife Diana.

He is effectively finished now.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top