Gary Neville

My very first post in this thread was about societal issues. Stop conflating the issue and read posts properly mate.

We aren't going to agree clearly.

Football isn't nor should it be seen as a vessel to try and fix all of society's ill's because it simply cant.

On any given Saturday a ground will have all sorts of individuals responsible for things society deems illegal, morally wrong etc yet we dont hear calls for football to sort it all out for good reason....it cant.

We have laws against racism and its good that incidents are reported, its good that clubs are dealing with them as a priority and its even better those found guilty are being dealt with.

My issue is the calls for football to do more.

What more can it do?

What more do the other 60,000 in the ground yesterday do?
 
Yes you did. You said yourself in your first post to justify your position "Neville reckons BOJO is to blame for racism, I reckon he's a bellend." when Neville has said no such thing. This is the very definition of a strawman argument. This is what you said.



In Neville's opinion he stated quite explicitly that he feels the Premier League and FA are not doing enough. He feels the players need to be empowered to speak out more. More generally with regards to racism he is saying it is a societal issue and that everyone has a shared responsibility to call racist behaviour out. He is saying that racism in football is a symptom of a wider issue which is racism in society. He is not advocating a lynch mob, just that society, and that includes everyone in it, has a responsibility to fight against racism.



All I said was that if you happened to be a white person in a predominantly white country that it would be expected that you probably wouldn't be affected by racism. I have no idea what colour or background you are, however inferred that you may be white as you state yourself "I am not worried the epidemic of racists are coming to get me" which is something that I would be surprised to hear from someone who comes from a BAME background. However I could be wrong. Happy for you to correct me if that's the case.

You stated that you don't think there is a "racism epidemic". I was merely pointing out that if my inferences above were correct, then you might not be the most attuned person as to whether or not this "epidemic" is on the rise as you're not subject to it yourself. However, as others on this thread have pointed out, instances of racial recidivism and hate crimes have been on the rise. Arguing about whether this rise is an "epidemic" is semantic at best. I am someone who feels that racism is not acceptable, and increases in racist behaviour are concerning. Just because you may not be worried about it, or that you don't think it is an "epidemic" doesn't mean it is not a concerning trend.



Apart from telling everyone that he thinks racism is bad, and society has a shared responsibility to deal with it, can you point me to an example where Neville is telling anyone else what to say or think? You seem to state that just because I've bullet pointed the summary doesn't make it right - can you point out which ones are wrong or which ones you don't agree with?

And for someone accusing others of twisting things to suit their narrative you've done a fine job of that yourself. From your own posts you've conflated what Neville said to have a go at the following
  • Being pissed off for being accused of "racist for just breathing"
  • "Neville generalised because of his political persuasion, he's upset maybe slightly bitter" - as I pointed out he leveled things at both sides of politics. You're insinuating that he is bitter. I thought only us Blues were the Berties here? ;)
  • "As soon as a discussion is to be had just like the trans discussion then opinions are shut down by the liberals who want a free run to exercise their agenda, whatever that mat be." How is Neville shutting down anything by using his platform to raise the fact that he thinks that instances of racism are of concern to him? I think the only people he could remotely be accused of shutting down are racists themselves, which unless you agree with racism is actually a good thing is it not?
  • "Neville reckons BOJO is to blame for racism, I reckon he's a bellend." He didn't blame BOJO for racism. This is an example of you twisting it to suit your narrative. As clearly pointed out he said both sides of politics were culpable for not dealing with racism.
  • "We haven't got an epidemic of racism we've got an epidemic of Tory hating luvvies who are sore about the election." You are setting your narrative quite plainly here.
  • "Whilst the world and his Dog celebrates Stormzy the violent homophobic racist, I and my fellow fas get lumbered with the tag casual racist by a media millionaire and millionaires like him." Again where has Neville lumbered you with the tag of being casual racists? It hasn't happened.
  • "Bojo isn't a racist and I am not worried the epidemic of racists are coming to get me." Again you're perpetuating the narrative that Neville has called BOJO a racist, when he hasn't



Actually I didn't mention it, Neville did when referring to "the leaders of both main parties are accused constantly over the last month of fueling racism and accepting racism within their parties". With Corbyn it was his in regards to antisemitism, and with Johnson it was with regards to Islamophobia. I used those examples as whilst you felt that BOJO wasn't racist he does tend to say some fairly racist and Islamophobic things.

I don't think it is racist to criticise those Islamic extremists/terrorists for their actions, however it is dangerous to paint all Muslims based on the actions of a few which is what Islamophobia is. You stated you're against Neville 'generalising', so I am right to assume you wouldn't want to tarnish a whole religion on the basis of a lunatic/extremist minority right?
This, and your other post above are both excellent.
 
If Neville is so keen on politics he should give up punditry to be the candidate to fight for the marginal seat of Bury North. He has plenty of money to keep him going and he would still get plenty of opportunity to hear the sound of his own voice.

We would all find it relatively easy then to avoid him and his views on anything and everything which is becoming increasingly difficult.
.

so anyone with political beliefs has to run for Parliament do they? Lol
 
My very first post in this thread was about societal issues. Stop conflating the issue and read posts properly mate.

We aren't going to agree clearly.

I'm not conflating anything.

You have challenged me on my view that I don't believe racism is as big a problem in the game as some seem to think.

Someone has statistically proven that to be the case. Considering you pine for stats so much, like a true politician you brushed it right under the carpet and tried to blame hate crime as the driver, when in fact it's clearly not related.

I can read, and based on what I've seen from you so far, my conclusion is your full of shit and you are absolutely right, we won't agree.

So I'll leave it here. Cheers.
 
My twitter timeline going crazy with it this morning.

It'll be the same for many. The power of social media gets on the back of things like Neville was talking about last night.

Is racism wrong? Of course it is. Do those individuals who commit offences need dealing with? Of course they do.

Is it as big a problem as people are making out? Like fuck it is.
 
Yes you did. You said yourself in your first post to justify your position "Neville reckons BOJO is to blame for racism, I reckon he's a bellend." when Neville has said no such thing. This is the very definition of a strawman argument. This is what you said.



In Neville's opinion he stated quite explicitly that he feels the Premier League and FA are not doing enough. He feels the players need to be empowered to speak out more. More generally with regards to racism he is saying it is a societal issue and that everyone has a shared responsibility to call racist behaviour out. He is saying that racism in football is a symptom of a wider issue which is racism in society. He is not advocating a lynch mob, just that society, and that includes everyone in it, has a responsibility to fight against racism.



All I said was that if you happened to be a white person in a predominantly white country that it would be expected that you probably wouldn't be affected by racism. I have no idea what colour or background you are, however inferred that you may be white as you state yourself "I am not worried the epidemic of racists are coming to get me" which is something that I would be surprised to hear from someone who comes from a BAME background. However I could be wrong. Happy for you to correct me if that's the case.

You stated that you don't think there is a "racism epidemic". I was merely pointing out that if my inferences above were correct, then you might not be the most attuned person as to whether or not this "epidemic" is on the rise as you're not subject to it yourself. However, as others on this thread have pointed out, instances of racial recidivism and hate crimes have been on the rise. Arguing about whether this rise is an "epidemic" is semantic at best. I am someone who feels that racism is not acceptable, and increases in racist behaviour are concerning. Just because you may not be worried about it, or that you don't think it is an "epidemic" doesn't mean it is not a concerning trend.



Apart from telling everyone that he thinks racism is bad, and society has a shared responsibility to deal with it, can you point me to an example where Neville is telling anyone else what to say or think? You seem to state that just because I've bullet pointed the summary doesn't make it right - can you point out which ones are wrong or which ones you don't agree with?

And for someone accusing others of twisting things to suit their narrative you've done a fine job of that yourself. From your own posts you've conflated what Neville said to have a go at the following
  • Being pissed off for being accused of "racist for just breathing"
  • "Neville generalised because of his political persuasion, he's upset maybe slightly bitter" - as I pointed out he leveled things at both sides of politics. You're insinuating that he is bitter. I thought only us Blues were the Berties here? ;)
  • "As soon as a discussion is to be had just like the trans discussion then opinions are shut down by the liberals who want a free run to exercise their agenda, whatever that mat be." How is Neville shutting down anything by using his platform to raise the fact that he thinks that instances of racism are of concern to him? I think the only people he could remotely be accused of shutting down are racists themselves, which unless you agree with racism is actually a good thing is it not?
  • "Neville reckons BOJO is to blame for racism, I reckon he's a bellend." He didn't blame BOJO for racism. This is an example of you twisting it to suit your narrative. As clearly pointed out he said both sides of politics were culpable for not dealing with racism.
  • "We haven't got an epidemic of racism we've got an epidemic of Tory hating luvvies who are sore about the election." You are setting your narrative quite plainly here.
  • "Whilst the world and his Dog celebrates Stormzy the violent homophobic racist, I and my fellow fas get lumbered with the tag casual racist by a media millionaire and millionaires like him." Again where has Neville lumbered you with the tag of being casual racists? It hasn't happened.
  • "Bojo isn't a racist and I am not worried the epidemic of racists are coming to get me." Again you're perpetuating the narrative that Neville has called BOJO a racist, when he hasn't



Actually I didn't mention it, Neville did when referring to "the leaders of both main parties are accused constantly over the last month of fueling racism and accepting racism within their parties". With Corbyn it was his in regards to antisemitism, and with Johnson it was with regards to Islamophobia. I used those examples as whilst you felt that BOJO wasn't racist he does tend to say some fairly racist and Islamophobic things.

I don't think it is racist to criticise those Islamic extremists/terrorists for their actions, however it is dangerous to paint all Muslims based on the actions of a few which is what Islamophobia is. You stated you're against Neville 'generalising', so I am right to assume you wouldn't want to tarnish a whole religion on the basis of a lunatic/extremist minority right?
Who is this BOJO character?
 
If Neville wants zero tolerance, why was he urging people to vote for Labour if he thought their leader was making racist comments?

Just sounds like more hypocrisy from the prick.
 
Just another point to this debate, and in no way does this excuse racism or even related: the players.

They don't help themselves, black or white, and play up to the crowds, entice them.

The Derby last week was a classic example of 11 players time wasting and rolling around all over the floor at the slightest touch. Football is a salt of the earth sport, and it's full of prima donna players who only serve to piss off a crowd. Some people can't cope with that and it sends them over the edge.

Agree mate, I mean Rudiger really shouldn't have got in the way of Son's boot - if only he had been more thoughtful of the crowd and moved out of the way of a red card offence then this whole awful situation could have been avoided. And as for Fred at our place? Who does he think he is trying to take a so-called "corner kick" in a football match? Disrespectful. That RAG Neville should stick to building hotels!!!
 
My twitter timeline going crazy with it this morning.

It'll be the same for many. The power of social media gets on the back of things like Neville was talking about last night.

Is racism wrong? Of course it is. Do those individuals who commit offences need dealing with? Of course they do.

Is it as big a problem as people are making out? Like fuck it is.

you wouldn’t say that if you had a mixed race friend who been spat at by racists three times since the election and told to fuck off now Brexit is getting done.
 
you wouldn’t say that if you had a mixed race friend who been spat at by racists three times since the election and told to fuck off now Brexit is getting done.

What has that got to do with football?
 
My twitter timeline going crazy with it this morning.

It'll be the same for many. The power of social media gets on the back of things like Neville was talking about last night.

Is racism wrong? Of course it is. Do those individuals who commit offences need dealing with? Of course they do.

Is it as big a problem as people are making out? Like fuck it is.

I’d give it a rest if I was you as your causal reaction to these events suggest it is a huge problem.
 
Agree mate, I mean Rudiger really shouldn't have got in the way of Son's boot - if only he had been more thoughtful of the crowd and moved out of the way of a red card offence then this whole awful situation could have been avoided. And as for Fred at our place? Who does he think he is trying to take a so-called "corner kick" in a football match? Disrespectful. That RAG Neville should stick to building hotels!!!

You should catch up over the last 4 pages before taking someone's post out of context.
 
I’d give it a rest if I was you as your causal reaction to these events suggest it is a huge problem.

I'll give fuck all a rest.

I don't think it's a huge problem in football.

This is a forum for opinions, if you disagree and can't handle that then block me, but don't tell me to give it a rest. You have no right to do that.
 
I'll give fuck all a rest.

I don't think it's a huge problem in football.

This is a forum for opinions, if you disagree and can't handle that then block me, but don't tell me to give it a rest. You have no right to do that.

Carry on acting a prick then
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top