UEFA FFP investigation - CAS decision to be announced Monday, 13th July 9.30am BST

[Man_City_Loyal]

Needs Tweeting to Conn. Or is it con?

MEN.

Note: Organised and clear.

City replied to the new details, in The Guardian , saying: “The 2014 settlement agreement resolved all open matters between the parties and was based on comprehensive information disclosure. The settlement agreement contains confidentiality provisions that prevent Manchester City from commenting on both the agreement and the investigation that it settled.

“It continues to be our position that we will not be providing any comment on out-of-context materials. The attempt to damage the club’s reputation is organised and clear.”

https://www.manchestereveningnews.c...ball-news/man-city-ffp-charges-leaks-17619213

Glad they have come out and said this

 

[richards30]

Glad they have come out and said this

the part about we can’t comment sounds like we were going to fight the original investigation but took the hit or pinch as khaldoon said but agreed to not say anything about it.

 

[Man_City_Loyal]

the part about we can’t comment sounds like we were going to fight the original investigation but took the hit or pinch as khaldoon said but agreed to not say anything about it.

Yeah same here. keep our cards close to the chest.

 

[richards30]

Yeah same here. keep our cards close to the chest.

I just think that uefa begged us to take the small hit and we did as long as we promised not to say that? You also can’t be punished for the same thing twice so I would imagine they know that but we will also not take any shit second time around!

 

[Man_City_Loyal]

I just think that uefa begged us to take the small hit and we did as long as we promised not to say that? You also can’t be punished for the same thing twice so I would imagine they know that but we will also not take any shit second time around!

soon see i suppose.

 

[denislawsbackheel]

I just think that uefa begged us to take the small hit and we did as long as we promised not to say that? You also can’t be punished for the same thing twice so I would imagine they know that but we will also not take any shit second time around!

Not true, double jeopardy protection only applies in criminal cases not civil.

 

[waspish]

Not true, double jeopardy protection only applies in criminal cases not civil.

It was deal we did over a hand shake I presume And a firm one at that.

 

[blue b4 the moon]

It was deal we did over a hand shake I presume And a firm one at that.

UEFA would never move the goalposts.

I hope we have something more solid if we're banking on their word.

 

[waspish]

UEFA would never move the goalposts.

I hope we have something more solid if we're banking on their word.

The full force of our owners Lawyers would be that something more solid.

 

[blue b4 the moon]

The full force of our owners Lawyers would be that something more solid.

Sounds great in principal.

If we were that sure we'd have had them & not taken a pinch last time.

 

[City Raider]

So Pinto was arrested just a couple of months after the hacked emails were published? And now these emails can’t be used against us because of his arrest and current case? And according to some on here the clock is running on the self-imposed UEFA 5 year limit to bring action?

Nothing to see here.

 

[richards30]

Not true, double jeopardy protection only applies in criminal cases not civil.

If we agreed to a deal and guaranteed to not divulge any info on a provision it was the one and only time then a deal would have been signed mate no doubt!

 

[Gorton_Tubster]

David Conn is a racist. I think the definition is of someone who has hatred for someone else based on their ethnicity.

He is a city fan.

He's Jewish.

 

[PannickAtTheDisco]

David Conn is a racist. I think the definition is of someone who has hatred for someone else based on their ethnicity.

He is a city fan.

He's Jewish.

don't see the relevance of 2 & 3.

 

[Thomas Hearns]

David Conn is a racist. I think the definition is of someone who has hatred for someone else based on their ethnicity.

He is a city fan.

He's Jewish.

Why’s his faith relevant ?

 

[Tim of the Oak]

David Conn is a racist. I think the definition is of someone who has hatred for someone else based on their ethnicity.

He is a city fan.

He's Jewish.

He’s not a City fan whoever claims to support.

 

[Metalartin]

I think the suggestion is, that he is a City fan but his motives/sentiments might be linked to his faith, although I'm not quite sure what Jewish people's thoughts on the UAE are.

 

[Gorton_Tubster]

don't see the relevance of 2 & 3.

He's a City fan. Then we are taken over. Now he reports shite about our club, and that is based upon where our owners are from. Maybe I am wrong, I thought he was a City fan, I cannot see ANY other reason for him hating our/his club.

 

[blueinsa]

David Conn is a racist. I think the definition is of someone who has hatred for someone else based on their ethnicity.

He is a city fan.

He's Jewish.

What has his religion got to do with your accusation?

 

[Gorton_Tubster]

What has his religion got to do with your accusation?

Why would a lifelong City fan suddenly become a hater? Why would he suddenly start trying to rip us apart? Expose our owners, exaggerate stories about us.

Maybe he has been told to do it by his bosses. Maybe he is a closet LFC fan. Maybe someone is paying him to write shit. I think it is based on ethnicity of our owners. I think that is why he has a total anti-city agenda.