Match Thread | Man City vs Fulham (26/01/20)

[Zin 'messiah' Zimmer]

Offside by a pube

If that happens with any significance it’s scratched off

 

[SebastianBlue]

[waits for VAR]

 

[der bomber28]

Heyzooooooooose!!!

 

[mat]

Even the BBC thought Jesus 2nd would be under VAR before changing the score.

 

[Chi-town blues]

Needs to play himself back into form, he has been very poor the last few weeks.

He has much minutes on his legs. Why risk him against 10 men 2 goal lead ?

 

[Cheesy]

The kids who are there are loving it and that's what matters :-)

 

[Mancity1980]

Great seeing those young kids in the crowd celebrating the fourth. The next generation.

 

[mancity2012_eamo]

Great. We’re awake.

Delighted for Gabby.

 

[Josh_D]

Jesus had to look over to ensure his goal was valid.

 

[RayCTID]

4?

6 (slow stream)

 

[Wretched Vengeance]

They're making a lot of mistakes trying to play out from the back, but superb pressing by City.

 

[malg]

VAR! What is it good for? Absolutely nothing!!

Say it again.....

 

[I'm Blue]

Unlucky Phil as well. Nice poachers finish from Gabs.

 

[mat]

That was 101

102...

 

[vin]

Maybe it,s part of his football education?

Very cliched comment. Not having it IMO.

He’s a brilliant attacking midfielder with great dribbling and an ability to split a defence. Why isolate him on the left wing?

 

[paulchapo]

Those goals should never be ruled offside by a bloody whisker anyway if we're stuck with var they have to alter the offside rule.

 

[I'm Blue]

6 (slow stream)

Haha, var for you.

 

[FogBlueInSanFran]

For all the whin(g)ing we like to do, nice to see a bunch of little kids having the time of their lives.

 

[Cornish_Blue]

Imagine how many goals Gabby would have if he could stay onside.

 

[SebastianBlue]

Wait... now they’ve given the “initial” 3rd goal?

NBCSN said goal, then no goal, then they’ve added it back.