United thread 2019/20

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ric
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
The press wind me up with these double standards all the time.

It was supposed to be £62m in the summer, you'd be lucky to get the same deal in January, let alone a £15m discount.

Sorry if already posted but the deal is worth up to £68m, which is how they'd report it for City, along with his wages. £47m plus addons. £8.46m via easily achievable targets(so just to make the reported fee lower then?) and £12.7m via more difficult targets(top4?).

As other have said they get pats on the back from the press when they sign players, does anyone know how far they are from overtaking us in spending?
 
Had been brought to play alongside Fred do u think .?
If so.. will pogba be benched when fit..in other words ...which of the over priced utd midfielders will pick up big wages for the rest of the season doing nothing. ..what a mess.
Their wage bill must be crippling the club.all that expenditure (Jones £80 M) for a Europa league campaign .lol
Even the pisscan wasn't THAT stupid, mate ;o)
 
The press wind me up with these double standards all the time.

It was supposed to be £62m in the summer, you'd be lucky to get the same deal in January, let alone a £15m discount.

Sorry if already posted but the deal is worth up to £68m, which is how they'd report it for City, along with his wages. £47m plus addons. £8.46m via easily achievable targets(so just to make the reported fee lower then?) and £12.7m via more difficult targets(top4?).

As other have said they get pats on the back from the press when they sign players, does anyone know how far they are from overtaking us in spending?

I don't know when they exceed our spending, to me that is no the point. In our early days of spending big we got the likes of Aguero and Silva who are still at the club and all could have been sold at a huge profit at any time we chose. There is not one Rag that they didn't overpay for, has gained in value and lasted more than a couple of years (Jones excepted -as no one is daft enough to buy him) They have been fleeced at every turn and should, with a decent honest media, be the laughing stock.
 
The press wind me up with these double standards all the time.

It was supposed to be £62m in the summer, you'd be lucky to get the same deal in January, let alone a £15m discount.

Sorry if already posted but the deal is worth up to £68m, which is how they'd report it for City, along with his wages. £47m plus addons. £8.46m via easily achievable targets(so just to make the reported fee lower then?) and £12.7m via more difficult targets(top4?).

As other have said they get pats on the back from the press when they sign players, does anyone know how far they are from overtaking us in spending?

It'll be 47m to Sporting and 20m to the agent but that will be kept quiet until a twitter leak. They're not fooling anyone, the money they're spending is the Pogba cash. Be surprised if he ever plays for them again.
 
It'll be 47m to Sporting and 20m to the agent but that will be kept quiet until a twitter leak. They're not fooling anyone, the money they're spending is the Pogba cash. Be surprised if he ever plays for them again.
He pocketed up to €25m for the Ronaldo move to Juve. So you could be right there, but United will make sure that is kept under wraps and the press wont be interested in digging for it. That's not the narrative they want.
 
Sky sucking rag cock again, no brainer the Ighalo deal, can't go wrong etc etc. If we'd gone after this deal we'd have got slated from pillar to post, desperation, very odd deal etc. This is pure desperation from the rags make no mistake about it.
 
If Ighalo is true, it is the most comical, most desperate signing I think I can ever remember

Have they really fallen this far!?!

"NOT IN MY LIFETIME"
 
tenor.gif
giphy.gif
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top