Uefa have recently forwarded CAS everything from the Der Spiegel articles.
They have NOTHING first hand, it's truly unbelievable.
Staggering.
They found us guilty off the say so of a Magazine article?
Hahahahahahahahahahahaha
Uefa have recently forwarded CAS everything from the Der Spiegel articles.
They have NOTHING first hand, it's truly unbelievable.
Staggering.
Which, if true, would mean we haven't given them the originals. That would make sense of the lack of co-operation allegation.
So their case is, a newspaper printed this, look it must be true ????
basicly martin samuel has said the top ten in the prem except for shieffield united have written to CAS to support the call for our ban to stand
Can you enlighten me ?Long time lurker on BM , but only just registered so hi to all.
The thing I find strange at the moment is the silence/lack of reaction to the Mail story on the Grauniad. They have been vehemently opposed to our owners , and our success, perhaps they are hiding something.
basicly martin samuel has said the top ten in the prem except for shieffield united have written to CAS to support the call for our ban to stand
This echoes what PB posted some time ago. Excellent news but who on earth is pulling the strings at UEFA. They must be stark raving mad.
It's even better than that the UEFA case is: "It was in a German newsaper which has subsequently been investigated by German regulators for publishing totally false stories and its all based on emails stolen by a man now facing extortion and hacking charges on a global scale. Good luck with that.So their case is, a newspaper printed this, look it must be true ????
They do theoretically. Their rules state that they can demand any documents. BUT, I think they went on a fishing expedition and asked for whole rafts. That will be a fierce debate at CAS, but Soriano called the published emails 'out of context' and UEFA will probably argue that they wanted to establish the true context. Obviously I am guessing, but I wager I'm not far off.Do they have the right to demand emails from a club even under their regulations - even if we admit they exist?!
Do they have the right to demand emails from a club even under their regulations - even if we admit they exist?!
Bear in mind that CAS is not a court and the normal rules of evidence (whatever they are in Switz.) will nor apply.It's even better than that the UEFA case is: "It was in a German newsaper which has subsequently been investigated by German regulators for publishing totally false stories and its all based on emails stolen by a man now facing extortion and hacking charges on a global scale. Good luck with that.