Deal agreed with Bayern Munich for Leroy Sane - €60m (including add-ons)

Status
Not open for further replies.
to criticize something or someone strongly, usually for moral reasons: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/condemn

It wouldn't surprise me if Bayern and Sane have held talks and agreed a deal but until we have any facts/evidence on which to prove it, I won't criticise Sane, because I/we may very well be jumping to conclusions which aren't correct and unless I'm mistaken we have common law relating to innocent until proven guilty in this country.
Who has criticised or condemned him?

You're arguing against your own specious reasoning mate.

Its fascinating to watch
 
Who has criticised or condemned him?

You're arguing against your own specious reasoning mate.

Its fascinating to watch
The posters calling for him to be banished to the reserves and his playing time limited as punishment for not signing a new contract, without any proof of wrongdoing.
 
The posters calling for him to be banished to the reserves and his playing time limited as punishment for not signing a new contract, without any proof of wrongdoing.
If he doesn't want to be here and the target club are trying to lowball us, that is a natural consequence of the transfer.

He will be handsomely rewarded whatever the outcome. You're trying to make a martyr out of Leroy with very specious logic.

It isn't personal. City cannot show weakness here. Given the club involved and their attitude towards us
 
I asked you to list every point you think I've avoided/missed and said I'll happily answer them. You've refused twice, then resorted to talking about argument styles, yet I'm attempting to save face? ;)
I referenced my question on both occasions and paraphrased your pathetic response just then.

You say you’ll answer questions but have had no actual response to any of the reasoned points that were made and you keep ignoring them while focusing on irrelevant points. In fact by doing so you have contradicted yourself a number of times.

I’m also not discussing argument styles as such, merely pointing out that what you say has zero substance.
 
Yes or no
Hahaha, you're a special one at times. Nothing is signed, there's no direct quotes from anyone involved, there's no substance to the speculation or claims at all and you want me to take that as fact/evidence and I'm the one with a trail of shit? :)

I have my personal opinion of how I expect this to play out btw and it wouldn't surprise me if it was true but I'm not going to condemn him until we know for sure, why would I, it doesn't make any sense and doesn't help the situation.

to criticize something or someone strongly, usually for moral reasons: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/condemn

It wouldn't surprise me if Bayern and Sane have held talks and agreed a deal but until we have any facts/evidence on which to prove it, I won't criticise Sane, because I/we may very well be jumping to conclusions which aren't correct and unless I'm mistaken we have common law relating to innocent until proven guilty in this country.
How many times would you like me to answer the same question?
 
I referenced my question on both occasions and paraphrased your pathetic response just then.

You say you’ll answer questions but have had no actual response to any of the reasoned points that were made and you keep ignoring them while focusing on irrelevant points. In fact by doing so you have contradicted yourself a number of times.

I’m also not discussing argument styles as such, merely pointing out that what you say has zero substance.
List them - this is the 3rd/4th time of asking.

You won't, you're hiding and trying to save face, coincidentally the exact thing you're accusing me of.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top