Another new Brexit thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ric
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
What you have to remember is anything bad that ever happens to our country From here on in is directly because of Brexit in remainers eyes

As for the the losers of the general election 2019, sorry I mean opposition parties. To write to the eu asking about an extension....this is a national disgrace.
But we’ve seen it before they just will not let the democratic wishes of the uk voters go without trying to undermine the whole thing.

Ploughing ahead with a plan while failing to respond to the new economic realities of the post pandemic world would be a national disgrace. I wouldn't advocate a two year delay but a period of letting the dust settle and reevaluating where we are at wouldn't be such a bad idea.
 
Ploughing ahead with a plan while failing to respond to the new economic realities of the post pandemic world would be a national disgrace. I wouldn't advocate a two year delay but a period of letting the dust settle and reevaluating where we are at wouldn't be such a bad idea.
We are not 'Ploughing ahead' simply doing what we said we would do, leave the EU.
 
Eh?
Of course not, and we won't be asking for one, because there is no point in doing so.
So the venerable Ed Davey is pissing in the wind, which is what he's always done, really.

How do you know there is no point? If we agree a deal in November and then have a further six month or one year extension period in which to prepare for new regulations and customs procedures especially with respect to GB/NI then is that not sensible?
 
How do you know there is no point? If we agree a deal in November and then have a further six month or one year extension period in which to prepare for new regulations and customs procedures especially with respect to GB/NI then is that not sensible?


"Sensible" is a strange word to use,as regards descisions this government often makes.
Like equating a toad with handsomeness ;)

Don't think there is too much desire to make a deal on our part.
 
Disappointing to see these posts

My comment is clearly talking about the subject of Brexit - posted on the Brexit thread. I am clearly referring to the situation whereby....

a) before the GE if such a bill had been brought before parliament it "......would have made me groan" and also - back in those days......

b) "...….we would have had so many posts on here explaining why an extension was good for the UK" - because that was the experience of 2017-December 2019

Why have either of you sought to suggest some indifference from me to the dreadful events caused by the pandemic?

On Tuesday a Remain poster was using the pandemic for the purpose of political point-scoring - I believe that it is highly inappropriate and disrespectful to do that.

This is the Brexit thread and is here for the purpose of discussing Brexit - IMO people should not use the dreadful events of the pandemic to score points on here.

You do know its not normal to be on here 24/7 and writing this volume of bollox at 4am?
 
Only 6 months ago this news would have made me groan - and we would have had so many posts on here explaining why an extension was good for the UK

Life has been so much better since December 2019
Obviously he hasn’t read the WA. Only the EU/UK 'Joint Committee' can jointly invoke Article 132 and extend the transition period for one or two years, EU law still prevails during the current transition period, so Parliament is irrelevant in this instance.

I like the way your post was edited and taken out of context.
 
Last edited:
How do you know there is no point? If we agree a deal in November and then have a further six month or one year extension period in which to prepare for new regulations and customs procedures especially with respect to GB/NI then is that not sensible?
I think the point of the mid year deadline for a deal is to give a 6 month lead in to no deal if that happens. Once we go past June both sides give up the talks and start to prepare for the WTO tariffs and customs checks. At some point you have to just accept that talks are a waste of time.

Brexiteers will no doubt rejoice but that is where it will start to fall apart. No deal is going to be very expensive and difficult for us as, the costs will all come out of the woodwork and we have never been told about the costs. Every little detail will be damaging to the government as they straight up lied about the implications of this for years. And that is all before it actually hits business right when we are looking to start an economic recovery. There is no way that Johnson can pull this off. I thought that before the events of the last week.
 
You wrote all this in an attempt to redefine the word ‘anything’? Remarkable.

You also think that a country that botched the introduction of lockdown, has botched the rules governing lockdown - and will no doubt botch the lifting of lockdown by going for it too early without the operational systems in place - has recorded the highest worldwide Covid 19 death rate per capita, is subsidising UK industry and its workforce to the tune of over £22 billion and rising might not just pause for thought and examine whether its priorities have changed just a tad since January? That our main priority is a virus and not the French or the Germans?

Has it occurred to you that out of all the European countries we are negotiating with the UK might just be in a lot worse shape than most of them come the end of the year? Or do we just dismiss this possibility because we are British and we will naturally be in far better shape than Johnny Foreigner? Which is how we approached the handling of the pandemic and that turned out really well didn’t it?
To be blunt @BobKowalski - I got this far:

"You also think that a country that botched the introduction of lockdown, has botched the rules governing lockdown - and will no doubt botch the lifting of lockdown by going for it too early without the operational systems in place - has recorded the highest worldwide Covid 19 death rate per capita...…."

And did not read the rest.

I intend to take the same approach with every post that I see that uses the tragedy that has befallen the nation and the ROW for the purpose of making cheap points on a thread that has got nothing to with the pandemic.

As I mentioned earlier - I find it wholly inappropriate and wholly disrespectful and I will not take part in such exchanges
 
Last edited:
I think the point of the mid year deadline for a deal is to give a 6 month lead in to no deal if that happens. Once we go past June both sides give up the talks and start to prepare for the WTO tariffs and customs checks. At some point you have to just accept that talks are a waste of time.

Brexiteers will no doubt rejoice but that is where it will start to fall apart. No deal is going to be very expensive and difficult for us as, the costs will all come out of the woodwork and we have never been told about the costs. Every little detail will be damaging to the government as they straight up lied about the implications of this for years. And that is all before it actually hits business right when we are looking to start an economic recovery. There is no way that Johnson can pull this off. I thought that before the events of the last week.

Completely. Whilst they're separate issues, anyone looking at how the government are handling this and thinking they have the competency to negotiate a decent brexit deal needs sectioning.

No deal is a cert for me now, and will be heralded as a success in spite of the fact it will be an indictment of this shower of shite's inability to get anything else.
 
To be blunt @BobKowalski - I go this far:

"You also think that a country that botched the introduction of lockdown, has botched the rules governing lockdown - and will no doubt botch the lifting of lockdown by going for it too early without the operational systems in place - has recorded the highest worldwide Covid 19 death rate per capita...…."

And did not read the rest.

I intend to take the same approach with every post that I see that uses the tragedy that has befallen the nation and the ROW for the purpose of making cheap points on a thread that has got nothing to with the pandemic.

As I mentioned earlier - I find it wholly inappropriate and wholly disrespectful and I will not take part in such exchanges
It is justified to comment on the daily performance of the PM and his government as they address the two greatest challenges that have faced the U.K. since ww2. Brexit and Covid. To describe it as political point scoring is simply using the same ‘distraction’ technique that Johnson and his sycophants have recently been attempting.
 
I was just replying to a post about the lack of responses regarding an extension. Most people’s minds are elsewhere now, hence why you only have a small handful of users still posting regularly on this thread. Maybe “zealots” was a bit antagonistic though, so I’ll take that back.
OK - I will accept that, but can I point out that it seems to be a growing trend from posters on one side of the debate to start using the tragedy of CV as something demean Leavers - it follows on from other similar methods over the years - but this, I suggest, goes too far.

Also - I think that you could understand me 'pausing' when reading your post- as it was posted only 10mins after these 2 posts:

Yeah - 60 odd k excess deaths may beg to differ
Yes, 2020 has been absolutely brilliant so far.

With your post immediately following @bluethrunthru practicing this 'new technique' in a reply to a post of mine that was purely about Brexit.

Anyway - I will just choose to follow my own standards on this matter and absolutely ignore posts that appear to exploit the pandemic
 
It is justified to comment on the daily performance of the PM and his government as they address the two greatest challenges that have faced the U.K. since ww2. Brexit and Covid. To describe it as political point scoring is simply using the same ‘distraction’ technique that Johnson and his sycophants have recently been attempting.
Didn’t you know that Brexit is happening totally in isolation from anything else in the world and any impact other major world events may have on Brexit can and should be totally ignored because a certain Brexit zealot wants to live in his Brexit wonderland without any distractions.
 
You've got to laugh at the desperation, and the utter futility of stunts like this.
After 4 years, this sad no mark, unsurprisingly wants a two year extension.
Not a few weeks or months, two years.
So after he and his ilk stymied Brexit for 4 years, the upshot being yet another election,
that this time, ended with the only party that offered to scrap the referendum result losing
its leader, and the official opposition destroyed, he wants another go.
Bless.
I mentioned the other day that there 'remain' a group of diehards that still hope to stymie Brexit - ideally secure a re-join or else convert the outcome to BRINO

Their best tactic at the moment is to support the EU in its proven technique of replacing the light at the end of the tunnel with more tunnel.

They will be thinking that if they can extend for 2 years and then perhaps extend again and then not have it all sorted before the next election - who knows what can be achieved...…..

For a government committed to Leave the best course of action is:

a) get a deal that reflects the UK red lines - have these committed to by the EU and if that occurs it would be the only reason to consider a short extension to do the i's and cross the t's - if not, then

b) Leave at the end of the transition and act to ensure that there is clear separation between the EU and the UK over the following 4 years.
 
Completely. Whilst they're separate issues, anyone looking at how the government are handling this and thinking they have the competency to negotiate a decent brexit deal needs sectioning.

No deal is a cert for me now, and will be heralded as a success in spite of the fact it will be an indictment of this shower of shite's inability to get anything else.

Yes - like driving in to a brick wall. The brexiteers will celebrate the point where we go past the safe breaking distance.

It is not just the tariffs and customs that will need to be in place - we will have 6 months to replace things like the; European Aviation Safety Agency, Chemicals Agency, Medicines Agency and The European Banking Authority (something like 40 agencies in total are funded through the EU budget that we benefit from). Some of these agencies have already closed their UK offices but we still rely on them - they are built into our laws. We do not have a domestic alternative and I don't see that anything has been done to replace them. How much will it cost, will it be ready on time, does Boris Johnson have the competence to deliver it - we will find out in 6 months?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top