Same as in the post you quoted. I'm struggling to understand why folks seem to have a hard time grasping a reasonable point.
- health crisis with people dying
- existing drug with potential benefits
- State request test trial and off label use.
- Test is done. Drug provided benefits with some risk.
- Health crisis subsides and more effective drugs with lesser side effects developed. Thus, Drug Administration withdraws off label use authorization.
What part of that sequence doesn't make sense to you?
Let me put it in football terms see if that will help your understanding: S
C
Suppose City had a big match coming up we had to win, but Aguero wasn't fully fit, but we know his potential to score in a must win game, Pep starts him anyway. 45 minutes in we are up 5-0. At that point the value of a not fully fit Aguero playing, is outweighed by the scoreline. So Pep pulls Aguero.
Hope that clears it up for you and your friends. :)