Donald Trump

Status
Not open for further replies.
Gaudion M said:
One of the most embarrassing posts i have ever read on here. The promotion of an unproven and potentially dangerous drug by a politician for political gain was/is a disgrace. He sacked the medical experts who tried to stop him and applied pressure on the medical profession to adopt it. People probably died although I doubt we will ever get the full story as its so politicised. The whole concept of politicising a drug treatment is a disgrace. It is indefensible.
Click to expand...

Not a single thing I said was false or conjecture. But you find that embarrassing.

Yet your response is Chuck full of personal opinion. And somehow that is getting likes. We truly are at the end of Civilization when someone who's response is riddled with opinion, thinks someone who is simply pointing out understandable facts has said something 'embarrassing.'

Get this into your head, not every statement cares to support or oppose whatever neurotic position you hold.

1. Nothing embarrassing about a post simply stating the facts about how a drug goes thru the cycle of testing and usefulness. If you find anything I said untruthful, point it out rather than making unsubstantiated general statements that says nothing about nothing.

2. Every drug tested on Covid was 'unproven' prior to being tested. So this is superfluous.

3. The drug has been around for 50 years and been prescribed and continues to be for other ailments. It's dangers are well known. The question was about it's efficacy. And there is only one way to find that out. Trials!!!!!

4. I know it's par to just accept whatever disagrees with Trump. But you should read up on both sides of the redeployment of The Medical doctor you claimed above was fired for disagreeing with Trump. Its nuanced. Something that has no value on this thread apparently.

5. Finally, all those who politicized the drug treatment are terrible. Don't remember anyone ever saying otherwise. But you putting together a post that PRETENDS I did. Speaks to the nature of this whole style of always arguing against some imaginary strawman in your head as opposed to what you actually read.

You are not the only one who does this though. It's pervasive here.
 
Dax777 said:
Not a single thing I said was false or conjecture. But you find that embarrassing.

Yet your response is Chuck full of personal opinion. And somehow that is getting likes. We truly are at the end of Civilization when someone who's response is riddled with opinion, thinks someone who is simply pointing out understandable facts has said something 'embarrassing.'

Get this into your head, not every statement cares to support or oppose whatever neurotic position you hold.

1. Nothing embarrassing about a post simply stating the facts about how a drug goes thru the cycle of testing and usefulness. If you find anything I said untruthful, point it out rather than making unsubstantiated general statements that says nothing about nothing.

2. Every drug tested on Covid was 'unproven' prior to being tested. So this is superfluous.

3. The drug has been around for 50 years and been prescribed and continues to be for other ailments. It's dangers are well known. The question was about it's efficacy. And there is only one way to find that out. Trials!!!!!

4. I know it's par to just accept whatever disagrees with Trump. But you should read up on both sides of the redeployment of The Medical doctor you claimed above was fired for disagreeing with Trump. Its nuanced. Something that has no value on this thread apparently.

5. Finally, all those who politicized the drug treatment are terrible. Don't remember anyone ever saying otherwise. But you putting together a post that PRETENDS I did. Speaks to the nature of this whole style of always arguing against some imaginary strawman in your head as opposed to what you actually read.

You are not the only one who does this though. It's pervasive here.
Click to expand...
Talking of drugs, do you reckon Trump is nailing the gear?
 
This is an unpopular take but I don’t see how you can justify a protest but not a rally. The mass protests are a green light for him to have his rallies.


The reason I say this is because I’ve just seen a CNN reporter (J.Acosta) asking the WH press sec if he’ll take responsibility if people get sick, meanwhile, his network has advocated these gatherings. Campaigning for racial justice is clearly a more worthy cause then his rallies but for a tv network to suddenly change it’s position and care about the impacts of covid-19 from mass gatherings seems remarkably disingenuous.
 
MeatnSpudsMCFC said:
This is an unpopular take but I don’t see how you can justify a protest but not a rally. The mass protests are a green light for him to have his rallies.


The reason I say this is because I’ve just seen a CNN reporter (J.Acosta) asking the WH press sec if he’ll take responsibility if people get sick, meanwhile, his network has advocated these gatherings. Campaigning for racial justice is clearly a more worthy cause then his rallies but for a tv network to suddenly change it’s position and care about the impacts of covid-19 from mass gatherings seems remarkably disingenuous.
Click to expand...

I think the main reason that they're considered different is that one is outdoors and one is indoors.
 
MeatnSpudsMCFC said:
This is an unpopular take but I don’t see how you can justify a protest but not a rally. The mass protests are a green light for him to have his rallies.


The reason I say this is because I’ve just seen a CNN reporter (J.Acosta) asking the WH press sec if he’ll take responsibility if people get sick, meanwhile, his network has advocated these gatherings. Campaigning for racial justice is clearly a more worthy cause then his rallies but for a tv network to suddenly change it’s position and care about the impacts of covid-19 from mass gatherings seems remarkably disingenuous.
Click to expand...

True but one is a reaction born of outrage and injustice. It was a grass roots movement without any single agent driving it that you could criticize. A trump rally has an organization behind it and therefore you can ask should they not know better.
 
Trevor Morley's Tache said:
Coke in the 80's/90's and more recently Adderall. Turned his brain to mush.
Click to expand...
His cognitive (and physical) decline in the last two years is manifest and precipitous.

If he gets re-elected, we’ll basically have Zammo at the head of the ‘free world’.

Can you imagine what state he’ll be in by 2024 ffs?
 
Gaudion M said:
True but one is a reaction born of outrage and injustice. It was a grass roots movement without any single agent driving it that you could criticize. A trump rally has an organization behind it and therefore you can ask should they not know better.
Click to expand...

I can get on board with that argument. I still doubt certain media outlets and their intentions though.
 
MeatnSpudsMCFC said:
This is an unpopular take but I don’t see how you can justify a protest but not a rally. The mass protests are a green light for him to have his rallies.


The reason I say this is because I’ve just seen a CNN reporter (J.Acosta) asking the WH press sec if he’ll take responsibility if people get sick, meanwhile, his network has advocated these gatherings. Campaigning for racial justice is clearly a more worthy cause then his rallies but for a tv network to suddenly change it’s position and care about the impacts of covid-19 from mass gatherings seems remarkably disingenuous.
Click to expand...

Communities and individuals protesting against murder at the hands of the police and general inequality is one thing(and they certainly weren’t allowed), the President having a rally for his own ego is another thing altogether
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top