ONTHERUNWITHTHAKSIN
Well-Known Member
Fuck me
Are we
Is we
Signing this lad
Are we
Is we
Signing this lad
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Kalidou Koulibaly
- Thread starter Matt Diablo
- Start date
That's subjective due to interpretation. I can consider Barcelona as an individual entity and say Barcelona is winning 1-0. I wouldn't personally, but it's not wrong. There's no specific and explicit rule on this type of case for a reason.Messi, Suarez, and Busquets are winning 1-0.
Barca are winning 1-0.
'Barca' or 'Barcelona' is a collection.
Shaelumstash
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 30 Apr 2009
- Messages
- 8,305
In US English, grammatically they treat a team or a company as an entity as opposed to a group of people.Messi, Suarez, and Busquets are winning 1-0.
Barca are winning 1-0.
What is Barca or FC Barcelona?
'Barca' or 'FC Barcelona' is a collection.
is the Beetles also playing at the Camp Nou?That's subjective due to interpretation. I can consider Barcelona as an individual entity and say Barcelona is winning 1-0. I wouldn't personally, but it's not wrong. There's no specific and explicit rule on this type of case for a reason.
or
are the Beetles also playing at the Camp Nou?
It's plural, because the Beatles itself is a plural term.is the Beetles also playing at the Camp Nou?
or
are the Beetles also playing at the Camp Nou?
The Who for instance can be either singular or plural.
In US English, grammatically they treat a team or a company as an entity as opposed to a group of people.
It's permissible in British English too, albeit less common.
A plural entity.In US English, grammatically they treat a team or a company as an entity as opposed to a group of people.
The Golden State Warriors are playing today.
Stephen Scurry is not playing today.
The Warriors is having a good game.
Draymond Green are not having a good game.
The Warriors are having a good game.
I'm With Stupid
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 6 May 2013
- Messages
- 23,214
I notice they only do it with our sports teams though, not their own. Most NBA teams have a pluralised name, and even those that don't are referred to with plural adjectives. They say "The Miami Heat are..." not "The Miami Heat is..."In US English, grammatically they treat a team or a company as an entity as opposed to a group of people.
Plenty of stuff is plural or singular depending on how the speaker sees it, but a sure sign that someone either doesn't watch football or isn't a native speaker of English is when they use the singular verbs, because usage conventions definitely favour the plural and that's what literally everyone uses when talking about sports teams.
mosssideblue
Well-Known Member
All we can do is trust the club to do the right thingCan you not understand how crazy you sound? We'll be here long after Pep, as much as we absolutely love him and what he's done, it shouldn't change the reason why we sign players.
You know as well as I do, the same people were the ones saying we had to buy Alexis Sanchez because he would guarantee us the league and we were stupid not to spend the money, especially when he then went to United. It's fucking mental.
citizen_maine
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 May 2011
- Messages
- 18,245
Are Koulibaly signing then?
That sounds even worse, you don't buy a player for a manager whose contract runs out in 12 months. It's a huge amount of money for a player who the new manager may not fancy, who would be very difficult to sell on because of his age and wages. That's the mistake United made with Ferguson, they fucked up the squad and brought in older players to give the pisscan a great send off. That destroyed any chance of future managers, they were stuck trying to get rid of the deadwood with no one coming through the ranks.Yes we’ll be here after Pep, but Pep is here! Right now! Let’s make full use of that. And again, there’s no saying that Sanchez could’ve been a success for us.
mosssideblue
Well-Known Member
We isFuck me
Are we
Is we
Signing this lad
Tugay One Cup
Well-Known Member
It's also very disingenuous to suggest I said that about THB, purposefully leaving out the bits about Garcia, Tosin and Fernandinho in the same setence isn't it.
If you look in the Garcia thread from yesterday you'll also see a highlighted a mistake Garcia made in the second half, it's called balance and understanding because it's very rare he makes a mistake. It's one of his biggest strengths as a player.
The point still stands, doesn't it?
Garcia, Harwood-Bellis and Tosin aren't ready to be first choice on a team that expects itself to have a reasonable chance of winning every competition it plays in. All three would get torn to pieces at various stages. Fernandinho is also not the answer, as steady as he has been this season.
Apologies if I'm misunderstanding what you're saying but we have been severely lacking in the centre of defence all season. Say what you want about Laporte being injured but Kompany was the most vital part and he's been gone for a year.
Garcia, Harwood-Bellis, Tosin and Fernandinho are not ready to fill his boots and most of them never will be.
I'm not sure how you think sticking with them would be a better option when there's been zero evidence of that so far.
how is Napoli playing?Are Koulibaly signing then?
Napoli is having a bad game and not playing well.
Napoli is not good enough.
I'm With Stupid
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 6 May 2013
- Messages
- 23,214
Are you assuming gender?Are he still signing for PSG?
It should be "Is they still signing for PSG?"
That's acceptable English.how is Napoli playing?
Napoli is having a bad game and not playing well.
Napoli is not good enough.
It's easier to digest if you use Napoli's instead of Napoli is.
Shaelumstash
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 30 Apr 2009
- Messages
- 8,305
I guess we’d need an American who understands their linguistic nuances to explain it, but I don’t think it’s only our sports teams, they do it with bands / companies.I notice they only do it with our sports teams though, not their own. Most NBA teams have a pluralised name, and even those that don't are referred to with plural adjectives. They say "The Miami Heat are..." not "The Miami Heat is..."
Plenty of stuff is plural or singular depending on how the speaker sees it, but a sure sign that someone either doesn't watch football or isn't a native speaker of English is when they use the singular verbs, because usage conventions definitely favour the plural and that's what literally everyone uses when talking about sports teams.
Nirvana is back with a new album. DC United is 0 from 3 on the road. Apple is opening stores Thursday.
I had an American tutor at an English uni who tried to correct my grammar saying I should use “is” when talking about a company and I thought he was on drugs.
You don't think they're ready, it doesn't mean they're not ready. Before the lockdown you had a large proportion of fans saying Foden still wasn't ready, saying we needed a Silva replacement and as soon as he suffers the slightest dip in form, they'll resurface.The point still stands, doesn't it?
Garcia, Harwood-Bellis and Tosin aren't ready to be first choice on a team that expects itself to have a reasonable chance of winning every competition it starts in. All three would get torn to pieces at various stages. Fernandinho is also not the answer, as steady as he has been this season.
Apologies if I'm misunderstanding what you're saying but we have been severely lacking in the centre of defence all season. Say what you want about Laporte being injured but Kompany was the most vital part and he's been gone for a year.
Garcia, Harwood-Bellis, Tosin and Fernandinho are not ready to fill his boots and most of them never will be.
I'm not sure how you think sticking with them would be a better option when there's been zero evidence of that so far.
Any dips in form of Garcia, Tosin and THB suffer are very easily mitigated with Fernandinho who like you say has been very steady. We would also have Laporte back which isn't to be underestimated.
I could say the same; there's less evidence buying a 29 year old for £60-90m is a guarantee of success, in fact I'd say there's fuck all. Before you mention VVD, the circumstances were completely different, Liverpool we're desperate for the league title and have a humongous rebuilding job to do in 2 years maximum due to their transfer policy. It was a huge gamble justified because their aspirations were different than ours having not won the league in 30 years.
PannickAtTheDisco
Well-Known Member
is/are, who cares, doesn't matter.
I might have has it backwards 3rd on Whoscored and 1st on Squakwa. The point being he was phenomenal that year.Actually according to whoscored Otamendi was the no 1 rated defender above Van Dijk. Mustafi had the same score as Van Dijk too. Would any team drop £75M on Mustafi or Otamendi maybe? Truth is everybody thought it was crazy money buying Van Dijk for £75M. Not the least his performance that season.
Hope this helps.
75 million was excessive. As no one had paid that much before. But it was clear to me and many others that he was the best defender available anywhere in the world.
This is now obvious to everyone. But at the time about 70% of the folks here wanted and preferred Bonnucci.
It's quite clear what side of that argument had it wrong.