UEFA FFP investigation - CAS decision to be announced Monday, 13th July 9.30am BST

What do you think will be the outcome of the CAS hearing?

  • Two-year ban upheld

    Votes: 197 13.1%

  • Ban reduced to one year

    Votes: 422 28.2%

  • Ban overturned and City exonerated

    Votes: 815 54.4%

  • Other

    Votes: 65 4.3%
  • Total voters
    1,499
Status
Not open for further replies.
cant beleive the silence, nothing spoken by anyone that could give a solid idea of the outcome, the press have nothing,,normaly things as important as this leak out a day or two before,so any leaks are about due but im expecting nothing,,lets hope the 6pm today rumour is happening
 
pep coming out and saying that is crazy and setting himself up for a big fall ? the club should not be letting the media ask pep questions about the CAS case. it should be football only questions and games coming up, silly by the media team at city again and the feeling i get every time there is a interview the media person is so weak and he should be all over the media when a question like that is asked
 
Man_City_Loyal said:
your source?
Click to expand...

A friend who is working at the Etihad today. He does a lot of work for City and is at the ground working at least 3 times a week. He isn’t a City fan and I would estimate the info he gives me is 50/50, but was wondering if anyone with a bit more of an inside connection had heard anything similar. I don’t even know if it related to the case could be a transfer or new deal?
 
The Light Was Yellow Sir said:
He wrote most of that article last month! Still going on with the ‘it’ll be a disaster for EUFA if City win’ line. It’s almost like he’s a Liverpool fan continually writing what he hopes to be true. Odd that him and DeLoony work for the same rag.
Click to expand...

Yes but have they both got degrees in journalism ? It matters apparently.
 
trumpton said:
I decided to take the bull by the horns. Just got back from CAS in Lausanne. After a quick early evening break in I located the typewriter used to notify determinations. Having examined the ribbon I can confirm that the result of the most talked about dispute in modern times is ......













BARM. It's a barm not a muffin!
Click to expand...


Pffft!

I was stood in the baker’s when 2 ladies came in to buy some breakfast rolls.
One of them was Swiss, and the other lady was Swedish, And this is what they said.

The Swiss lady asked for Brotli, as this has six letters I Assumed it must be muffin!

The Swedish lady said Frukost Bullard!

don’t think there was any need for that!

:-)
 
ancoats said:
pep coming out and saying that is crazy and setting himself up for a big fall ? the club should not be letting the media ask pep questions about the CAS case. it should be football only questions and games coming up, silly by the media team at city again and the feeling i get every time there is a interview the media person is so weak and he should be all over the media when a question like that is asked
Click to expand...
Unless the club are happy for him to answer. As he has given the answer many times they must be comfortable with it.
 
projectriver said:
This has always been Tony Evans line and always contrary to what others have said. I've no doubt he's been told that by his source at UEFA but it seems very unlikely that it was not from the leaked material
Click to expand...

I must admit I hadn’t seen that before and almost saying City will be hoisted by their own petard.
Or it’s semantics and UEFA are merely indicating the hundred or so pages of response from City didn’t disprove the hacked material.
 
cityzen81 said:
While most of us don’t like the CL it is important to the club and players a like so like it or not the result of this will have huge implications, hence why (I think) we are all concerned about it
Click to expand...

Massive bag of shit when blues say they dont like the CL.

Dont love playing the likes of Real, Barca' Bayern and Juve?

Dont love the top little European away trips with the firm?

Please.
 
ayrshire_blue said:
Hmm, I'm no expert on the subject but that doesn't sound good. So the leaked email's and stuff from der speigel can be cast aside but it's the documents that we as a club have actually provided to UEFA where they've found the evidence to charge us?
Click to expand...

Sources "close" to UEFA.
Having a laugh aren't they. Another hatchet job.
If this was the case UEFA would have made sure it was all over the media long before we appealed.
 
Jam Tomorrow said:
I must admit I hadn’t seen that before and almost saying City will be hoisted by their own petard.
Or it’s semantics and UEFA are merely indicating the hundred or so pages of response from City didn’t disprove the hacked material.
Click to expand...

Tony Evans is the bitterest of dippers and knows absolutely fuck all about the case or the outcome.

Ignore the ****.
 
Jam Tomorrow said:
This is an interesting article in the Independent today, basically UEFA appear to be saying their evidence and reason for the ban is based on documentation provided by City, not the hacked emails.


https://www.independent.co.uk/sport...league-ban-appeal-date-cas-uefa-a9611751.html
Click to expand...
This has concerned me since the email referring to the ‘two lines’ of income. If I remember rightly, there was a line which had a figure for Etihad and one for ADUG? Can anyone recollect this?
 
Stoned Rose said:
Massive bag of shit when blues say they dont like the CL.

Dont love playing the likes of Real, Barca' Bayern and Juve?

Dont love the top little European away trips with the firm?

Please.
Click to expand...

I don't like it because it's bent, there is absolutely nothing to like. A competition run to help their footballing royalty clean up, we shouldn't like anything the cabal regurgitate as yardsticks for greatness.

We boo them for a reason.
 
Jam Tomorrow said:
This is an interesting article in the Independent today, basically UEFA appear to be saying their evidence and reason for the ban is based on documentation provided by City, not the hacked emails.


https://www.independent.co.uk/sport...league-ban-appeal-date-cas-uefa-a9611751.html
Click to expand...

I refuse to click on a link from the Independent, as it's firmly set its stall out as nothing more than an extension of Liverpool's PR department, and home to the most vitriolic, one-eyed, aggressively anti-City trolls currently masquerading as 'journalists', such as Delaney and Evans - however they've been pushing this line for a while now, so it's nothing new.

It lacks plausibility that we would willingly incriminate ourselves through providing the entire evidential base for UEFA's case against us, whilst at the same time taking the strident public position we have since UEFA announced their sanctions.

If the evidence comes from our side, we will understand it just as well as UEFA - if not better - so if we knew we'd incriminated ourselves in any way, we'd have settled already. This whole angle reeks of someone who really doesn't understand the case taking something they've heard in isolation from one side, with no attempt at corroboration, and running with it as it serves the agenda of the rag he works for.
 
Stoned Rose said:
Massive bag of shit when blues say they dont like the CL.

Dont love playing the likes of Real, Barca' Bayern and Juve?

Dont love the top little European away trips with the firm?

Please.
Click to expand...

Guess that's the problem with forums and people having different opinions .
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top