CAS judgement: UEFA ban overturned, City exonerated (report out p603)

west didsblue said:
This is the only rule we’ve been found guilty of breaking. Just an administrative issue. Fuck all really.

Article 56: Responsibilities of the licensee
The licensee must:
a) cooperate with the licensor and the UEFA Club Financial Control Body in respect of their requests and enquiries;
b) provide the licensor and the UEFA Club Financial Control Body with all necessary information and/or relevant documents to fully demonstrate that the monitoring requirements are fulfilled, as well as any other document requested and deemed to be relevant for club monitoring decision-making, by the deadline set by the licensor and/or the UEFA administration (the reporting entity or combination of entities in respect of which information is required must be the same as for club licensing);
c) confirm that all the submitted documentation and information are complete and accurate;
d) promptly notify the licensor in writing about any subsequent events that constitute a significant change to the information previously submitted to the licensor, including a change of legal form or legal group structure.
Click to expand...
We should pay the fine in 50 p pieces
 
7ec8bac40dc10eb5b82675458acf25aa52b79bfa.jpg
 
Nebuchadnezzar said:
Exonerated
Click to expand...
We haven’t been exonerated, as such.

Reading it, it seems like UEFA couldn’t prove we were guilty to a good enough extent so the ban has been overturned but it hasn’t been proven that we did nothing wrong.

This is great for the club being able to play in the CL next season and ongoing, but hasn’t done anything for our reputation like being absolved of guilt/proven innocence would have done.
 
This is what the fine was for

Article 56 – Responsibilities of the licensee The licensee must:

a) cooperate with the licensor and the Club Financial Control Panel in respect of their requests and enquiries;

b) provide the licensor and the Club Financial Control Panel with all necessary information and/or relevant documents to fully demonstrate that the monitoring requirements are fulfilled, as well as any other document requested and deemed to be relevant for club monitoring decision-making (the reporting entity or combination of entities in respect of which information is required to be provided must be the same as for club licensing);

c) promptly notify the licensor in writing about any subsequent events that constitute a significant change to the information previously submitted to the licensor.
 
I feel like a massive weight has been lifted. Fantastic news, will be interesting to hear what Pep says.

Delaney, Harris, Evans I hope you are all choking on your cornflakes

Any lurking Dippers and Rags a big fuck you.
 
Eccles Blue said:
I had to rely on the Guardian!! BBC stuck at 9.28, couldn't make head nor tail of the Club statement and our wonderful BM DOWN!! I had 3 gadgets on the go and couldn't find out anything but in Manchester City I trusted and I was right to trust them!!!!! (As always!!)

YEEEESSS, now to win the flipping thing in a few weeks time!! That'll show 'em, that'll show the bunch of so and sos!!! :-)
Click to expand...
Couldn’t get on blue doom, had to find out on sly fucking sports
 
RandomJ said:
10 millions euros for refusing to play along with what has legally been proven to be a bullshit case. I know that’s peanuts for City but it’s still a bit of a joke. Guess someone has to pay for the UEFA Christmas party.
Click to expand...
Money well spent, if we'd supplied everything they'd requested it would have leaked all over the place and some serious spin would have been applied. played a blinder here has our club
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top