CAS judgement: UEFA ban overturned, City exonerated (report out p603)

[HelloCity]

 

[Lee won pen]

Well said Souness :
It was the right decision. FFP is about protectionism. There shouldn’t be a cartel of clubs preventing others investing

...I paraphrase

 

[I'm Blue]

Well said Souness :
It was the right decision. FFP is about protectionism. There shouldn’t be a cartel of clubs preventing others investing

...I paraphrase

Just saw him, he’s been saying this all along.
Souness is always pretty fair generally.

 

[cityzen81]

Anyone know what they are on about?

 

[Carlos- the- jackal]

Just saw him, he’s been saying this all along.
Souness is always pretty fair generally.

He’s making sure he still get’s his leg over, his (tidy as fuck) mrs and her family are blues.

 

[slbsn]

Our legal team did not need to be particularly clever to realise that any alleged breaches which occurred more than 5 years before the date we were notified of the decision - around 14th Feb 2020 - were time-barred.

It is the instigation of the investigation and not the AC decision that stopped the clock. That is why this false narrative that we filibustered is a nonsense. http://jurisprudence.tas-cas.org/Shared Documents/3297.pdf I get the impression, UEFA weren't completely sure if they were in time and I think they are right that if the dishonest concealment had been proved the limitation period probably would not have saved City.

 

[Manchester_lalala]

Well said Souness :
It was the right decision. FFP is about protectionism. There shouldn’t be a cartel of clubs preventing others investing

...I paraphrase

Good bloke Souness, says it how it is.

 

[Blueknows]

Anyone know what they are on about?

Ive reread it a number of times and it doesn't make sense

 

[I'm Blue]

He’s making sure he still get’s his leg over, his (tidy as fuck) mrs and her family are blues.

I knew that : )
He does dish it out towards us now and then too.
I remember the him giving us stick for the way we handled the Tevez saga.
Which I didn’t mind, him giving his opinion rather than just having a go cos it’s City like the rest of the top hats.

 

[1.618034]

I thought CAS were publishing more details today...?

 

[HelloCity]

Ive reread it a number of times and it doesn't make sense

Basically just saying people who work for City were retweeting pro Liverpool/anti City tweets following the CAS news.

 

[1.618034]

Ive reread it a number of times and it doesn't make sense

Seems a tad sarcastic to me.

 

[mccity]

Basically just saying people who work for City were retweeting pro Liverpool/anti City tweets following the CAS news.

The idea that there are non-City fans working for City, that simultaneously dislike City isn't farfetched.

The idea that there's some sort of revolt going on though, is.

 

[jaiguruKun]

Anyone know what they are on about?

It’s sarcasm.

It is the instigation of the investigation and not the AC decision that stopped the clock. That is why this false narrative that we filibustered is a nonsense. http://jurisprudence.tas-cas.org/Shared Documents/3297.pdf I get the impression, UEFA weren't completely sure if they were in time and I think they are right that if the dishonest concealment had been proved the limitation period probably would not have saved City.

Then what does Article 38 CFCB mean when it states the time limit begins on the date the decision is notified?

 

[Blueknows]

Basically just saying people who work for City were retweeting pro Liverpool/anti City tweets following the CAS news.

well then they should be sacked if that's the case..always had a suspicion theres a few moles within

 

[PannickAtTheDisco]

I thought CAS were publishing more details today...?

Not specifically today, it's expected some time this week.

 

[1.618034]

Not specifically today, it's expected some time this week.

Ah. Thanks. Just thought I read somewhere that it was expected today.

Be better if it's not on a day when we're playing a game I suppose..?

 

[Fordyboy46]

Ive reread it a number of times and it doesn't make sense

Yep, don't get it. Surely it's the Sheikh going after Liverpool?

 

[slbsn]

It’s sarcasm.



Then what does Article 38 CFCB mean when it states the time limit begins on the date the decision is notified?

Non-statute of limitations time limits - basically every time "days" is referenced in the rules.

 

[levets]

All I’m bothered about is this... The headline. Exonerated of the main allegation. The time barred stuff and non co operation is fluff...