M
M
mat
Guest
90 pages long.
89 pages redacted by requests of R.Parry, D.Gill, Senor Tebas...
89 pages redacted by requests of R.Parry, D.Gill, Senor Tebas...
Isn't it more likely that the lawyers are concerned that some of the information in the CAS statement could prompt action from other parties ie not City or UEFA. In a UK case you would be protected from any action over anything said in a public hearing but I am not sure what would apply to a closed hearing held in Switzerland. Perhaps City named the "leakers" as part of their defence to not-co-operating.Yes , you are right, he has that tits up.
Maybe the report is being blocked by other clubs afterall.Still nothing ?
no one has got a clue where the docs are.
Digging coal in a health centre?Mines in the local Health Centre
Still nothing ?
But just last week, they said it would be published in a few days.Not sure why anyone is continuously pressing F5 on that CAS page. It took CAS about 16 months to upload the fuller PSG verdict - it randomly appeared the week before last for some weird reason - so if that is anything to go by, some fucker is going to have a very sore finger!
But just last week, they said it would be published in a few days.
But just last week, they said it would be published in a few days.
Would be a corker, even if redacted:True enough, so hopefully we see it soon.
I really hope this rumour of other clubs having concerns about the content is true.
That’s why I want it dropping pre game tonightTrue enough, so hopefully we see it soon.
I really hope this rumour of other clubs having concerns about the content is true.
CAS are an hour ahead of us so it's not going to be tonight. Perhaps the dippers are named and they didn't want it to drop on the same night as they get the PL trophy.I want it dropped before the game tonight
We could always let it slip out accidentally