Chi-town blues
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 5 May 2012
- Messages
- 31,363
So who is obligated to cover for all city’s legal expenses? It’s a high profile case and am sure it wasn’t cheap .From my quick reading, which I haven't finished, CAS declared that anything that happened prior to 2014 was time-barred but not anything after. So they could examine the sponsorship revenues that were paid after 2014 and found those were properly paid and weren't disguised equity funding. That clearly implies that had the other payments not been time-barred, they would also have been found to be properly paid.
Therefore anyone claiming we got off "on a technicality" is completely wrong.