CAS judgement: UEFA ban overturned, City exonerated (report out p603)

From my quick reading, which I haven't finished, CAS declared that anything that happened prior to 2014 was time-barred but not anything after. So they could examine the sponsorship revenues that were paid after 2014 and found those were properly paid and weren't disguised equity funding. That clearly implies that had the other payments not been time-barred, they would also have been found to be properly paid.

Therefore anyone claiming we got off "on a technicality" is completely wrong.
So who is obligated to cover for all city’s legal expenses? It’s a high profile case and am sure it wasn’t cheap .
 
Are the hateful eight now known as the nasty nine or the negligent nine seeing as they didn't do their due diligence with regards to the case
 
Reading the parts about the leaks and the hacked emails, with CAS' subsequent denial of our claims, it backs up those who suggested that the first day hadn't gone that well for us.

That was presumably the assessment of whether they were admissible at all?
I quite like the idea that City appear to have described some of UEFA's case as irrational.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top