CAS judgement: UEFA ban overturned, City exonerated (report out p603)

[M12Blue]

Someone get this blown up and on a banner around the ground

Should be printed on front of t shirts for the players warming up for Madrid with f#ck you on the back

 

[dickie davies]

What does it say mate? 74 ads blocked on that one page and it's unreadable.

That City showed a disregard for FFP and that City did everything in its power to win the appeal

 

[Manc Born & Bred]

What does it say mate? 74 ads blocked on that one page and it's unreadable.

They are obviously reading the document and adding in bits without context. So far we sent nine lawyers, nine clubs wanted us banned and CAS revealed 'there was a blatant disregard of principles' but they haven't said what they were or in what context. I assume we knew that the document was being released today and the lawyers are on speed dial

 

[I'm With Stupid]

point 225 talks about one of the leaked emails was from 10 years ago! Looks like UEFA really fucked this up...

The problem is that's exactly how it will be reported. Not that UEFA brought a false case against us to protect the interests of favoured clubs, but that they clearly didn't do a good enough making a case for what we all know: that Man City are bunch of cheats.

 

[bobmcfc]

Fucking Newcastle ?

 

[kevin horlocks wand]

Fucking wished I hadn't. We are so cleared by this judgment and the Mail attacks us to make us look a guilty party in some way. Trying to find a negative headline the desperate twats.

how city got “let off”

“blatant breach of FFP rules “

If our lawyers don’t go after them for this tripe then we are weak as piss

 

[M12Blue]

now is the time for city to come out and release a statement, and then of course go after these journalists with their fibs

Absolutely

 

[Barcon]

That City showed a disregard for FFP and that City did everything in its power to win the appeal

That's disgusting. We should have bent over and took it up the shitter.
Cheers.

 

[Pam]

They signed the letter then there was a follow up conference call to decide on what they do next that wolves declined to be part of,don't know why

Cheer, Kaz

 

[BringBackSwales]

Has anyone got in touch with Simon Jordan, via Talksport yet?
The wait for the full report was worth it
What a royal set of twats we have been up against

He’s still on page 1 and scratching his thick fucking head

 

[Barcon]

They are obviously reading the document and adding in bits without context. So far we sent nine lawyers, nine clubs wanted us banned and CAS revealed 'there was a blatant disregard of principles' but they haven't said what they were or in what context. I assume we knew that the document was being released today and the lawyers are on speed dial

Cheers mate. I won't bother clicking on their site in the future. No idea how anyone can see the print through all the pop up videos.

 

[pudge]

I'm gonna chance it and be lazy, just for now but if/when the likes of @Prestwich_Blue have read it and given their trusted summary can someone quote it and tag me?

 

[Sir peace frog]

@Prestwich_Blue ,when you've had chance to read it, is there any chance you could start a new thread with bullet points and laymen's term, so the hard of learning(me) can take them in and give it back to the gobby fuckers at work

ta

 

[kevin horlocks wand]

What does it say mate? 74 ads blocked on that one page and it's unreadable.

how city got “let off”

and how we “blatantly broke the principles of FFP”

oh and how we had 9 lawyers at the hearing as if that matters

 

[TheCentralScrutinizer]

Fucking Newcastle ?

i was genuinely pleased for them when i heard they were being taken over,hope it gets blocked now & they go another 66 years winning fuck all

 

[BringBackSwales]

So who is obligated to cover for all city’s legal expenses? It’s a high profile case and am sure it wasn’t cheap .

Is it FFP deductible?

 

[Paladin]

@Prestwich_Blue
A majority of the (three person) panel felt that we had acted legitimately. I assume that means we won on a majority 2-1 decision. If UEFA's case was so flimsy, how can one panel member have supported them? I'd be surprised if the media didn't make something of this.

 

[FogBlueInSanFran]

Fucking Newcastle ?

The rags of Tyneside? Yet another reason to love Sunderland.

 

[Pam]

Fucking Newcastle ?

Before the Saudi negotiations, presumably.

 

[Exeter Blue I am here]

Para 84 confirms that the emails were edited selectively and two were merged to give a completely misleading impression.

Also 'HH' was not Sheikh Mansour. Sorry @cjn - posted that then saw your post.

And Tony Evans' claim that UEFA weren't substantially relying on the emails was complete bollocks. That was their whole case, as I said.

You’re my new hero PB! Seriously, a whole series of balls on accurate calls. Great stuff!