CAS judgement: UEFA ban overturned, City exonerated (report out p603)

Damanino said:
Get ready as no way in hell Uefa or G14 or Spiegel are not holding something back still to release it on either Wednesday or Thursday to do maximum damage just before the Real Madrid game on next week Friday.

Could be something that will run through newspaper and will dominate articles about City, maybe even Pep will be questioned on it in the presser for Real game.
Expect Tebas to do another round of his nonsense, like if City beats Real thats the death of football or something like this...
English media most likely hoping Real winning it.

Well the actual refereeing of the CL game will be another one to watch, the first leg the ref did perfect job but it was just days after the Valentines day massacre they put us through with the ban. They may have wanted to look impartial.
Now they lost at CAS, all bets are off, if they fuck us out of CL with the ref the media will see to it to paint it as justice.
Early red card for City, made up penalty given to them early on.

We just need to make sure we convert our fucking chances and dont do any comedy defending, because we do shoot ourselves on the foot a lot this season.
Click to expand...
It's almost like the run up to Derby day where the week leading up to the match was just shit headline after shit headline about us.

Like someone alluded to previously the fact none of the papers have gone with it could be we've had a word, just the keyboard warriors peddling their usual rubbish.
 
Damanino said:
Get ready as no way in hell Uefa or G14 or Spiegel are not holding something back still to release it on either Wednesday or Thursday to do maximum damage just before the Real Madrid game on next week Friday.

Could be something that will run through newspaper and will dominate articles about City, maybe even Pep will be questioned on it in the presser for Real game.
Expect Tebas to do another round of his nonsense, like if City beats Real thats the death of football or something like this...
English media most likely hoping Real winning it.

Well the actual refereeing of the CL game will be another one to watch, the first leg the ref did perfect job but it was just days after the Valentines day massacre they put us through with the ban. They may have wanted to look impartial.
Now they lost at CAS, all bets are off, if they fuck us out of CL with the ref the media will see to it to paint it as justice.
Early red card for City, made up penalty given to them early on.

We just need to make sure we convert our fucking chances and dont do any comedy defending, because we do shoot ourselves on the foot a lot this season.
Click to expand...
Obviously i hope we go through but if we don't, then i hope it's just us being beaten by the better side on the night and not by any shenanigans.
If we go on to win the CL, the squad and the coaching staff deserve all the plaudits going ( they won't get them), they'll have to have balls of steel to see this through, what with all the off the field nonsense being directed at our club
 
Considering how misleading the first batch of those leaked emails were I don't think any respectable organization wants to take a chance accusing City considering how shit the source is. I'm no legal expert but surely damaging the reputation of a company based on a source that is proven to be highly unreliable and has a history of fabrications could be grounds for a lawsuit.

This is a nothing situation.
 
I'm no expert on this, in that respect I bow to others who have proven themselves to have a good understanding of the intricacies etc but surely this "gotcha" email is simply Simon pierce writing an email explaining that, within a few months, he will be able to use his position to arrange how often one of our sponsors use the corporate box they have asked for as part of their sponsorship??

Its not exactly an example of him stating he can dictate how much they pay, or how often they pay it in which case it basicslly says nothing of any value to our enemies??
 
lancs blue said:
That would suggest that Pinto hacked into the EAA's mail accounts as well, has that been confirmed anywhere?
Click to expand...
Not necessarily. I can log into and send emails at work using my home email address, but if anyone hacked them, they would appear to have come from my work's email server.

He's just doing 2 jobs at the same time. (Clever chap! I can usually only fit one broom up my a**!)
 
The letter from Pearce to Etihad, that Der Spiegel have now released, relates to state finance of Etihad Airlines and is consistent with previous disclosures suggesting Etihad directly paid only £8m of their annual sponsorship of Manchester City. City fans had been speculating for months about state support for Etihad.....David Conn wrote about this many months ago after Prestwich Blue discovered documents in a US company competition hearing suggesting Etihad's sponsorship of Manchester City would be underwritten by the UAE state. I took it as a given that Etihad was supported by the UAE state on the same way that many nationalised industries are. Saudi Telecom sponsor Manchester United, whilst Emirates Airlines sponsor many sporting clubs and tournaments. I think the underlying relationship between Etihad and the UAE state is already known, or can be surmised, so I don't think this disclosure changes anything.

City have repeatedly said that the email release was an organised attempt to smear and target the club, and these latest reports fit that description. For many months a small group of 'journalists' have agitated and issued arguments to undermine Manchester City, and they go on and on. The cry wolf once too often and will end up proving City's argument that this is a smear campaign. They are effectively representing the interests of some elements of private US capital in a quite scurillous manner.
 
Last edited:
Obviously Delooney got his wrists slapped badly over his ridiculous Twitter activity, at Newcastle fans being the final straw that led to the mass blocking. He's therefore blethering about Newcastle and trying to link anyone he can to joining Utd.

While the hoaxman Evans mentions the Spiegel release briefly on twitter, the Independent seem to have ignored it in terms of reporting. Odd how many are not writing about it.
 
MillionMilesAway said:
Obviously Delooney got his wrists slapped badly over his ridiculous Twitter activity, at Newcastle fans being the final straw that led to the mass blocking. He's therefore blethering about Newcastle and trying to link anyone he can to joining Utd.

While the hoaxman Evans mentions the Spiegel release briefly on twitter, the Independent seem to have ignored it in terms of reporting. Odd how many are not writing about it.
Click to expand...

Maybe other fans now are not clicking on it as much so we should ignore it to then they’ll move on to the next mass click bait article they can push.
 
When you think of how many e-mails they had access to it's pretty desperate on their part to publish one about the use of a corporate box. The game's up, what are they now trying to achieve?
 
waspish said:
Yeah it’s after he dissects the Newcastle debacle.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/f...shley-right-rich-people-deals-tell-world.html
Click to expand...
What's going on is that a small group of journalists are supporting the interests of US owned private capital. The tie-up between Guardian journalists and US capital is becoming interesting of itself. When Staveley discussed the withdrawal of the Saudi takeover she was reportedly upset about the objections of some powerful English football clubs. Liverpool supporting Jonathan Liew's article in today's Guardian is evidence of this. They want to cherry pick between 'good' and 'bad' private capital. It's one step from racism, indeed much of the propaganda against Manchester City has taken that tone for years.
 
Marvin said:
What's going on is that a small group of journalists are supporting the interests of US owned private capital. The tie-up between Guardian journalists and US capital is becoming interesting of itself. When Staveley discussed the withdrawal of the Saudi takeover she was reportedly upset about the objections of some powerful English football clubs. Liverpool supporting Jonathan Liew's article in today's Guardian is evidence of this. They want to cherry pick between 'good' and 'bad' private capital. It's one step from racism, indeed much of the propaganda against Manchester City has taken that tone for years.
Click to expand...

Agree I mentioned it a few months back but these American owners want more American owners of clubs in premier if they get to 14 we are fcuked but the media don’t see it or they do and they want it with the closed shop premier to boot.
 
Something’s going on, cos none of the papers (bar the Guardian) are running the story this morning. I refuse to believe for one second that the assortment of City hating, dog shit, vindictive, click-bait merchants at the Indie and the Fail, have abandoned their “crusade”, so I can only assume they have been threatened with legal action by City, or, more likely are keeping temporarily shtum whilst they consider the legal niceties of their next attacks, which they are doubtless liaising with Der Spiegel over. These are people with no sense of dignity remember. No way will they just let the matter drop, regardless of the fact there’s nothing of consequence in it
 
Irony is that it’s the main perpetrators in G14 who win their league every year; are in debt yet are still splashing the cash.
If we were linked with the number of players the rags are chasing - for big money - we’d be crucified.

it’s not going to change for a while so we should just crack on.

unless we hear that UEFA are looking at the new emails then I think this thread should be closed. The crap journalists are feeding from it & twisting it to suit their narrative as they are too ignorant to write from their own research- except of course Martin Samuel
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top