You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Kalidou Koulibaly
- Thread starter Matt Diablo
- Start date
A little graphic there lmaoIt's code for "pre-pubescent scrotes on Twatter will laugh at us and I can't handle that"
Prestwich_Blue
Well-Known Member
The change has been to basically combine this year and next into a single year's financial results, as I understand it. So it's still on a 3-year aggregate basis but this year and next are treated as one year rather than two.
Player prices can put unecessary pressure on a signing as well. Media is ruthless.
There's a lot of moving parts to this whole haggling thing (;
Yep like putting in an official bid ;)
If Koulibaly had played for Celtic at any point over the last 10 years he'd have won stuff too.Its too much for a player who has achieved next to fuck all. At leat with van Dijk he won something before he arrived in England (and I don't rate that player too highly)
The change has been to basically combine this year and next into a single year's financial results, as I understand it. So it's still on a 3-year aggregate basis but this year and next are treated as one year rather than two.
So you could spend 2 summers worth of money this summer and then not spend at all next summer.
birchwoodgingerste
Well-Known Member
Dont understand that€80m, 30 next year, not had a good season so some have said, could be on the decline,
Just my opinion obviously
We need him the moneys irrelevant
Do you want us to sign a 2nd choice cheaper alternative who would be no better than the defenders we have?.
If Koulibaly had played for Celtic at any point over the last 10 years he'd have won stuff too.
True but they did buy him (van Dijk) for much cheaper and it was a lesser risk deal. This is meant to be one of our main centre backs.
Last edited:
Prestwich_Blue
Well-Known Member
Yes, if I've got that right.So you could spend 2 summers worth of money this summer and then not spend at all next summer.
blueparrot
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Jun 2012
- Messages
- 33,407
Would explain chelseas prospective spend, they could spend last years, this years and next years all in one splurge. A risk though if some signings don’t work out.Yes, if I've got that right.
Prestwich_Blue
Well-Known Member
Chelsea are carrying a huge loss from 2019 of £96m. They made £60m profit in 2018 so they'll have to break even, certainly avoid a big loss, over the next 2-year periodWould explain chelseas prospective spend, they could spend last years, this years and next years all in one splurge. A risk though if some signings don’t work out.
ChicagoBlue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 10 Jan 2009
- Messages
- 21,841
Thought this year was a write-off for FFP, due to pandemic? Thought that’s why everyone had their cheque books out, but nobody wants to spend!?
blueparrot
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Jun 2012
- Messages
- 33,407
Didn’t realise they had that 2019 loss. Can’t see how they can buy Werner, Havertz, Chilwell and a keeper without some big sales then. Especially in the current climate.Chelsea are carrying a huge loss from 2019 of £96m. They made £60m profit in 2018 so they'll have to break even, certainly avoid a big loss, over the next 2-year period
Semper aggressus
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 19 Sep 2019
- Messages
- 8,105
- Team supported
- Manchester City
Chelsea are carrying a huge loss from 2019 of £96m. They made £60m profit in 2018 so they'll have to break even, certainly avoid a big loss, over the next 2-year period
Doesn't the amount the top clubs get from Sky and the CL more than cover that?
blueparrot
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Jun 2012
- Messages
- 33,407
No, just merged into next year.Thought this year was a write-off for FFP, due to pandemic? Thought that’s why everyone had their cheque books out, but nobody wants to spend!?
This is getting boring now.
atleast we seem to have brought it down from the 90 mil asking price. every million counts I guess