BlueMoonRisin’
Well-Known Member
Third best source; )What about daddies ..
Third best source; )What about daddies ..
Fixed for youOnly official sites, not just in sport but news and business. Twitter is generally populated by attention seekers and wannabes.
There seem to be two or three posters on BM that appear to have decent info on City stuff though. No idea if they're on DRUGS.
Only official sites, not just in sport but news and business. Twitter is generally populated by attention seekers and wannabes.
There seem to be two or three posters on BM that appear to have decent info on City stuff though. No idea if they're on Twitter.
Twitter is also full of actual journalists who supplement their physical medium (newspaper, magazine, website) by communicating on it. I always get a kick out of people that just dismiss everything related to it. Any decent journalist is going to have a Twitter account nowadays, the key is who can you trust? I presume that is why the OP started this thread. Unfortunately, and I don't know why it is (and won't try to surmise), there seem to be a lot more shit stirrers in the media over in the UK and Europe. In the divided states it's pretty easy to separate the click bait from responsible journalism only by looking at the publication. I've always gotten the impression that is not the case over there.Only official sites, not just in sport but news and business. Twitter is generally populated by attention seekers and wannabes.
There seem to be two or three posters on BM that appear to have decent info on City stuff though. No idea if they're on Twitter.
That Hagrid bloke is no different than City Xtra, he posts the stories, nothing more.
Less Puma rimming though I suppose.