Kazzydeyna
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 5 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 3,145
We would make the 100m spent on him 10 times over with him playing for us, much more than even winning the Champions league .
If that was true we would have paid the 700m and still walked away with a 300m profit.
Revenue would increase of course if we signed him but not by nearly enough.
Anyway, it is a moot point. He will sign a miraculous extension by Easter.
If we've got a spare few 100m to throw about I'd rather we spent it in Haaland.