I don't see that as the point at all
I see it that he is being a typical mardarse senior CS type that, because of his EU sycophancy, is refusing to undertake the job he has been well paid to do - to provide advice on how the achieve the implementation of a desired outcome of the PM
The more that do the same - the less there will be a need for Cummings to cull
It's admirable to hear so much concern about the reputation of the nation after years of hearing the same people talk it into the ground and demean its worth on the world stage.After a couple of years of not wanting to stop brexit, just uphold parliamentary democracy, we now have not wanting to stop brexit, just uphold international law and our national ethical standing.
It's admirable to hear so much concern about the reputation of the nation after years of hearing the same people talk it into the ground and demean its worth on the world stage.
Yep - it is of course just an outpouring of objectivity and support for UK Sovereignty and democracy - I am sure that it has nothing to do with Remainers seeing their arses and double standardsIt's admirable to hear so much concern about the reputation of the nation after years of hearing the same people talk it into the ground and demean its worth on the world stage.
I didn't criticise 'remainers', I was criticising the likes of YOU.Laughable response. The tory govenment is literlally demeaning the nation on the world stage and you pop up to accuse remainers of doing it. Nope - Remainers were pointing out that this was the direction we were taking. The government is only now coming clean with it.
EU: Okay UK, how do you want a deal?Just listened to Jeremy Hunt on the radio reminding people that the biggest UTurn in the brexit negotiations has been from the EU, after they stated that they were happy for Britain to leave on a deal the same as Canada and Japan and then reneging on that agrement. Barnier convieniently forgets this when he trumps out his tired retoric about the UK not budging. Hold your nerve Frost.
Yep - it is of course just an outpouring of objectivity and support for UK Sovereignty and democracy - I am sure that it has nothing to do with Remainers seeing their arses and double standards
Did any Remainer advocate breaking the law to achieve it?And is not the gist of what you are saying here exactly what Remainers on here were applauding as democracy in action in the days of Bercow, Grieve and Soubry?
Was all that exultation and gloating really less than a year ago???
Shameless.I don't see that as the point at all
I see it that he is being a typical mardarse senior CS type that, because of his EU sycophancy, is refusing to undertake the job he has been well paid to do - to provide advice on how the achieve the implementation of a desired outcome of the PM
The more that do the same - the less there will be a need for Cummings to cull
Yes, normally I'd regard this as jingoistic or an anachronism based on our colonial past, but it is touching to witness such fervent patriotism.It's admirable to hear so much concern about the reputation of the nation after years of hearing the same people talk it into the ground and demean its worth on the world stage.
Just clarify for the sake of the simple. When you say "ignoring international commitments" you mean that our sovereign Parliament can abrogate any international treaty. Is that breaking international law?Parliamentary sovereignty gives parliament the right to enact whatever law it chooses. There are no limits other than the ones it imposes on itself.
Beyond that, I’m not entering into a debate on the merits of what it should do. I only wanted to point out what it can do legally, to which the answer is ‘anything.’ And yes, that includes going rogue and ignoring international commitments. I’m a long way beyond wasting my time arguing with people who think it’s a good thing to be willing to walk away from international agreements. I’m simply pointing out that the provisions of the WA, despite what was said at the time, do not impose legal restraints on what Parliament now chooses to do.
On the last paragraph, Perhaps we can agree that they are a bunch of incompetent cunts?
Just clarify for the sake of the simple. When you say "ignoring international commitments" you mean that our sovereign Parliament can abrogate any international treaty. Is that breaking international law?
Is there any reason why the EU fishing fleet need obey the 200 mile limit to UK waters? Isn't that governed by international law?
Shameless.
Does any Leaver have any idea of honour left?