Another new Brexit thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ric
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
He hasn’t said why he is resigning at all. Precedence has been that the only times a treasury lawyer has done that is because they won’t knowingly implement anything they know to be unlawful. Where have you got the assumption that it’s political from, bearing in mind he’s been in position for six years (a position that has always been independent and impartial)?

do you know that thing called parliament it makes and changes laws all the time
 
Pathetic to see the Brexit Brains Trust queuing up to defend the government’s proposal to break an international agreement, particularly one that they were all wetting their pants with excitement over when Johnson presented it as a huge victory over the EU last year, even though it effectively ceded NI to the EU.
 
One side in this negotiation will be keen to mobilise the GFA in their cause. Let's see who that is before we get all moralistic about integrity and ethics.
The GFA is collateral damage.

The government is saying it intends to break international law by unilaterally amending a treaty that says it can't be unilaterally amended.
 
Are you really not listening? Or wumming?

I don't wum Vic.

Care to answer?

Sovereign Parliament can do whatever the fuck it wants. That's what we got told last year as it did its very best to reverse brexit and it was roundly applauded by many on here.

Breaching International law is something many countries are accused of. The EU was accused of doing so last year re the migrant crisis, as was Norway.

It's the new bone for you all to chew on for a few days and throw around which i get and understand but as of right now, have we broken International Law and if we have, how?

If we haven't and this is a negotiating tactic, that i will admit then feel free to say that.
 
One side in this negotiation will be keen to mobilise the GFA in their cause. Let's see who that is before we get all moralistic about integrity and ethics.
It seems to be those already talking about not giving in to terrorists (which rather ignores how we got the GFA). But it's not the main issue. It's a possible consequence of wanting to break the WA treaty.
 
I don't wum Vic.

Care to answer?

Sovereign Parliament can do whatever the fuck it wants. That's what we got told last year as it did its very best to reverse brexit and it was roundly applauded by many on here.

Breaching International law is something many countries are accused of. The EU was accused of doing so last year re the migrant crisis, as was Norway.

It's the new bone for you all to chew on for a few days and throw around which i get and understand but as of right now, have we broken International Law and if we have, how?

If we haven't and this is a negotiating tactic, that i will admit then feel free to say that.
I don't care to answer. Waste of time on a wummer.
 
Hence we're leaving.
Your point?
Actually we’ve left.
I can’t quite understand why the Brexiteers are acting like we haven’t and are happily embracing a stated intention to break an international agreement to achieve something that’s already happened. It’s almost like they’ve been brainwashed.
 
It seems to be those already talking about not giving in to terrorists (which rather ignores how we got the GFA). But it's not the main issue. It's a possible consequence of wanting to break the WA treaty.
Like I said. Let's see who stoops low enough to mobilise the GFA as leverage in the negotiations - it might be Boris for all I know, we'll just have to wait and see. Then we can all have a great discussion about ethics, integrity, and agreements.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top