Donald Trump

Status
Not open for further replies.
SebastianBlue said:
Indeed he did — I had raised him shortly after he began posting (well before he joined this thread), and he was given ample opportunity to prove my (and other mod’s) suspicions incorrect.

He obviously did the opposite.

Anyway, best to move on, otherwise his work lives on.

If anyone needs a reminder of Trump and co’s genocidal mania, here’s another.


Click to expand...

All the same though eh
 
cjn said:
Not surprising, but man, fuck this guy. This nominee is a nightmare for anyone who cares about passing progressive policy for **checks notes** the next 30 years or so.
Click to expand...
It’s a nightmare on so many levels I’ve stopped trying to articulate them.

This is me now.

tenor.gif
 
FogBlueInSanFran said:
I am. I thought Romney would stand up. But otherwise, not surprised at all that McConnell found the votes.
Click to expand...
I wish I could say I am.

The only thing that would truly shock me at this point is if Collins casts the *deciding* ‘No’ vote that sees any confirmation fail (she may very well cast a ‘No’ vote, but only if her vote isn’t needed to confirm).

But that has as much a chance of happening as a miniature purple elephant spontaneously appearing in my kitchen (even if the laws of quantum mechanics makes both technically possible).
 
Vic said:
Useless as an academic exercise if the quotes from Trump were lies.
Click to expand...
Non sequitur.
Whether truth or lies Vic ,the point is that when Trump says anything it is mainly seen by MSM et. al. as morally abject or false even though it may be objectively true. It's a bias. Much like MSM's general treatment of City.
 
paulsimpson said:
Non sequitur.
Whether truth or lies Vic ,the point is that when Trump says anything it is mainly seen by MSM et. al. as morally abject or false even though it may be objectively true. It's a bias. Much like MSM's general treatment of City.
Click to expand...
One Trumper wummer gets banned and another pops up.
 
paulsimpson said:
Non sequitur.
Whether truth or lies Vic ,the point is that when Trump says anything it is mainly seen by MSM et. al. as morally abject or false even though it may be objectively true. It's a bias. Much like MSM's general treatment of City.
Click to expand...
I don't see how something 'objectively true' is biassed.

It sounds like you are suggesting the MSM simply ignore it.
 
SWP's back said:
He’s a ****. So we know he hates Trump but loves his bible and having control over women’s wombs.

Pelosi to impeach please.
Click to expand...
Impeach for what ? Maybe a desire to defend a moral right to life of a baby in the womb?

Romney also has 2 bibles, the book of Moroni and the Christian bible. Surely he has a right to freedom of religion to believe those no matter how preposterous any or all those 2 may seem?

As for control over women's wombs it's mainly liberals ( within Dems and Repub parties ) who have had more control over women's wombs since Roe v Wade while babies in the womb have no say whatsoever.
 
paulsimpson said:
Impeach for what ? Maybe a desire to defend a moral right to life of a baby in the womb?

Romney also has 2 bibles, the book of Moroni and the Christian bible. Surely he has a right to freedom of religion to believe those no matter how preposterous any or all those 2 may seem?

As for control over women's wombs it's mainly liberals ( within Dems and Repub parties ) who have had more control over women's wombs since Roe v Wade while babies in the womb have no say whatsoever.
Click to expand...
Utter claptrap.
(on many levels)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top