Donald Trump

Status
Not open for further replies.
No it is not . Argue the man and the argument is lost .
People have faults . Trump is guilty of shooting his mouth off . That said are you perfect in your use of the tongue?
But on the major issues of the day Trump is spot on the mark . Look at the Dems at the moment as they've gone too far :

Bills introduced to end a child’s life up until the minute they are born. Genocide .
Promise to pack the Supreme Court with far leftist judges who would vote to continue the slaughter up until birth and possibly even beyond. The last President supported partial birth abortion. Trump may be able put some stop to the incessant killing. It's a huge issue for many Americans and hes not afraid to talk about it .

Calls to dismantle police departments and let major cities burn to the ground
Promises to de-fund and abandon police force and turn cities and neighborhoods over to violent mobs.
No country or society can survive without some kind of police force. But the Dems may want it virtually abolished if they get their way. They are certainly capable of it. Then you have complete anarchy which would suit them fine as power is ultimate goal.

Blatant pledges to confiscate firearms from law-abiding citizens and not those criminal elements in cities such as Chicago. Selective.

Two tier justice system as courts favour Dem left . That's the way the legal culture is. That's autocracy.

Violent, anti-Semitic rhetoric out of the mouths of elected members of the House of Representatives radicalising and encouraging violence especially younger members of society. A O Cortez encouraged radicalism a couple of days ago.

I thought you were a left winger?
 
We are all allowed one mate but as you say we can wonder if it was worth the effort. AOC is the focul point for people with ideological views because she has strong ones herself. But nothing in that blokes post espoused any real points, it was a rant with an AOC lemon top
No problem with him posting just not sure where he’s coming from tbh, anyway it’s his time not mine
 
Bazza_no_longer_Talks

His other two accounts have also been ****ed off.

Back to regularly scheduled discussion.
Out of interest.
What were his other two accounts?
Did they end in repetitive numbers?
He was banned for WUMing across quite a few threads, football and political.


I referenced them previously in the thread and both were quite fitting:

Penoche
2Timer

You won’t find any posts from them viewable on the forum.
I checked Bazza’s 38 posts last night.
As you say across all subjects, he made himself very obvious.
Bizarrely, or not, these accounts were all posting from the same department at a particular Merseyside university. Not students either, but professors (plural). Intrigued to know what the motivation was. Might ask the Dean.
 
Bizarrely, or not, these accounts were all posting from the same department at a particular Merseyside university. Not students either, but professors (plural). Intrigued to know what the motivation was. Might ask the Dean.

We are all just rats in a social experiment.
 
Bizarrely, or not, these accounts were all posting from the same department at a particular Merseyside university. Not students either, but professors (plural). Intrigued to know what the motivation was. Might ask the Dean.
Do you think Saunders would know?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ric
Bizarrely, or not, these accounts were all posting from the same department at a particular Merseyside university. Not students either, but professors (plural). Intrigued to know what the motivation was. Might ask the Dean.
Intriguing indeed.

The Case of the Professors’ Piss-take.

Or, alternatively, The Case of Wackademic WUMing.

The indomitable Detective Ric is on the trail.
 
Bizarrely, or not, these accounts were all posting from the same department at a particular Merseyside university. Not students either, but professors (plural). Intrigued to know what the motivation was. Might ask the Dean.
Was paulsimpson posting from there as well by any chance?
 
I obviously hope that in the event of a SCOTUS review of an election results/certification challenge by the Trump regime Roberts would force any justice appointed over the next month to recuse themselves.

And @FogBlueInSanFran may very well be correct in that SCOTUS will also generally swing against Trump expectations to maintain at least the perception of judicial independence (and, as Joyce Alene said, the rule of law), anyway.

I am just nowhere near ‘confident’ all of that will happen.

I am *trying* to be more optimistic, though. :-)
Never stop being optimistic Seb.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top