Donald Trump

Status
Not open for further replies.
If you can’t be bothered reading/watching the evidence we provide to you based on your demands, why should we have any sort of discussion with you?

This is how these always go.

Twat says something that's obviously not true in support of Trump.

People point out that it's a lie.

Twat says "prove it!" despite having no proof for their claims.

Prople provide proof.

Twat says "That's not proof" despite it being definitive proof.

People provide more proof.

Twat either repeats step 3 or tries to come up with some way of shifting the goalposts to a new lie and repeats the cycle.
 
This is how these always go.

Twat says something that's obviously not true in support of Trump.

People point out that it's a lie.

Twat says "prove it!" despite having no proof for their claims.

Prople provide proof.

Twat says "That's not proof" despite it being definitive proof.

People provide more proof.

Twat either repeats step 3 or tries to come up with some way of shifting the goalposts to a new lie and repeats the cycle.
Summed up most Trump supporters.
 
This is how these always go.

Twat says something that's obviously not true in support of Trump.

People point out that it's a lie.

Twat says "prove it!" despite having no proof for their claims.

Prople provide proof.

Twat says "That's not proof" despite it being definitive proof.

People provide more proof.

Twat either repeats step 3 or tries to come up with some way of shifting the goalposts to a new lie and repeats the cycle.
Indeed it is.

And there is a method to my approach to it.

Think of it as a live assessment. ;-)
 
Just because we don’t adhere to your self-serving standard.

And this list is more than a year old — more
Just because we don’t adhere to your self-serving standard.

And this list is more than a year old — more violence from Trump supporters (right and far right) has occurred since.

Not self-serving at all. If all those cases are true then they deserve everything they get. There are also many videos circulating of far left groups (antifa) burning flags and assaulting people for simply carrying American flags or wearing MAGA hats. I just don't understand how doing that gets back at Trump.

 
If you can’t be bothered reading/watching the evidence we provide to you based on your demands, why should we have any sort of discussion with you?

 
Just because we don’t adhere to your self-serving standard.

And this list is more than a year old — more violence from Trump supporters (right and far right) has occurred since.

Not self-serving at all. If all those cases are true then they deserve everything they get. There are also many videos circulating of far left groups (antifa) burning flags and assaulting people for simply carrying American flags or wearing MAGA hats. I just don't understand how doing that gets back at Trump.

 
Ok, this is where we end the discussion, as most reasonable people would not hold that link (or the sub links on that page) to be credible, vetted sources.

You responded to a month old post with baseless assertions contradicted by fact.

And you have selectively responded to posts, ignoring the ones that call out the contradictions, inconsistencies, and falsehoods in your original and subsequent statements.

You have also posted and then deleted many different comments, which further muddles the discussion in the thread.

In fact, you’ve derailed the thread.

So we can move on or you can move on.
 

Ok.

You’re source is American media Inc. Owner of the National Enquirer and paid $150,000 in hush money to prevent Karen Mcdougal making sexual harassment allegations against Donald J Trump on his behalf.

Credible.
 
Not self-serving at all. If all those cases are true then they deserve everything they get. There are also many videos circulating of far left groups (antifa) burning flags and assaulting people for simply carrying American flags or wearing MAGA hats. I just don't understand how doing that gets back at Trump.

Nice Google search.

Quite a right-wing site you've 'stumbled' upon there. Not particularly fair and balanced.
 
“Needtoknow.news” with information from Breitbart.
Great source.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/need-to-know/
If you can’t be arsed clicking on it here’s the highlights.
92C4544D-1120-480F-AFAA-A6D875BE775F.png
 
Can you point me to the BBC article that details Democrats inciting violence at a rally; I'd be interested to read it.

I don't read much BBC stuff (particularly football or City stuff) but here's an article from a left-leaning source. There is violence from extreme left and extreme right groups. Claiming it is just right wing hate groups is burying your head in the sand.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top