Status
Not open for further replies.
Another addition of “Shut Up Father Fact Check”...



Ha, I was always slightly baffled by what Trump thought was being enabled (being on the fringes of the business) - the govt underwriting some costs will have helped a lot (stockpiling vials/needles, the reported making of the vaccines before trials were complete), but the pharma companies were always going to go in on this. Only companies with no vaccine background would ignore it.

I still expect any successful vaccine to be licensed out, simply in order to produce the millions needed (this is just hunch, rather than based on any experience of it).
 
“...the one thing...”


Perfect.

I said to the wife the other day that Trump will not have good people around him, the good ones would have had an exit plan and they will be well into it, the staff that remain will be the ones with no better option. Whatever organisation there is around him will be crumbling to the ground. Add to the mix his reluctance to pay bills and this is the kind of mess you end up with.
 
We’re off to a cracking start...from Biden special advisor Wolfstahl

‘1) She is American.
2) You should be ashamed of yourself.‘

Whilst I don't know the answer to his question, I would have thought that a member of Parliament would have an idea about how these things work.

It's almost as if he was a foul, rancid racist who is a total fucking anachronism and living breathing (unfortunately) testament to just how far we have to go in this matter.
 
It is the 9th November and they are STILL COUNTING!
To be fair. The system is built with time to allow counting and transfer of power happens in January next year. It always takes ages but in most years the loser accepts the result once its clear what the outcome is.
 
Sorry the article is still discussing overstatement of wealth not understatement.



I am happy to concede that there is evidence that indicates a possibility of insurance fraud, but it is overstatement of personal net worth not understatement that is the issue.

This is an extract from the Washington Post article referred to in your link. Apologies, I can't provide you link the publication paywalled and I obtained it via an external database. If it isn't breaking forum rules I can PM you and Trevor Morley's Tache a copy (about 2000 words long).



Reading between the lines I believe the type of insurance discussed in personal guarantee insurance made in respect of guarantees Trump in respect of insurance on a physical or financial asset.


Not something directly discussed on here but I have found the source of Maddow's claim about Trump picking a grossly inflated value for his mansion.

A graphic in the videoclip showed a financial statement for Seven Springs LLC (Limited Liability Company)- it was a valuation of the holding company and not what appeared to be the main underlying asset (the Mansion). Trump had plans to build luxury properties on the land and then shelved them- hence the yo-yo valuation.
I’ve no interest in understatement or overstatement as it wasn’t my claim. I was showing you he is being investigated for both bank and insurance fraud.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top