Man of the Match Olympiakos CL Group C (A)

[I'm Blue]

Went with the dog.
Stones played well, as did Mendy.
Others too but thought I’d give the boo boys a mention.

 

[WestGorton]

Foden but Mendy was good TBF.

 

[cleavers]

BBC have a player rating vote, worst City player voted for Phil Foden 4.86/10.

 

[stonerblue]

Sumptous moments from Foden, including his very well taken goal but faded when he went out wide.

Gundogan heavily involved and looked in total control.

Dias gets it from me though. On the face of it he didn't have much to do, What he did do though he did very effectively, sniffing out any chance of a breach with minimum fuss. Also strted opening his gob and marshalling the others.

honorable mention for Stones as well. looked comfortable on the ball (finally) and put it about a bit when needed.

 

[Scottish Cityzen]

Voted for Stones - that was a reminder of what he’s capable of. If he keeps that up he will get a lot of games.

Foden was excellent, nice and direct. Dias continues to impress.

 

[Cheadle_hulmeBlue]

Voted for foden, but I thought stones was fantastic.

 

[knuckles]

Foden for me, but I thought Mendy was pretty good especially in the first half, in fact our back 4 all played well.

 

[Vienna_70]

Foden , but if you want a laugh go to the BBC player ratings , worst player on the pitch apparently , BBC becoming more of a joke with every passing day.

I saw that too.

However, I think it’s the publi's vote, rather than the BBC’s own ratings, which just goes to show how little the average armchair fan really knows about the game.

 

[jimmygrimblesboots]

I saw that too.

However, I think it’s the publi's vote, rather than the BBC’s own ratings, which just goes to show how little the average armchair fan really knows about the game.

The fact the BBC see such stupid voting and allow it questions their integrity.

BBC and integrity in the same sentence , apologies.

 

[Trevor Morley's Tache]

Easier to say who it wasn't. Bernie is clearly lacking confidence, and it showed. Good that he had the full 90 minutes though.

Everyone else had a pretty good game. Notably Foden, Dias and Stones, but I went for Gundog in the end, as he controlled the game in midfield. Tough decision though.

 

[adeinchessy]

According to the BBC website report of the game, Foden was City's worst player with a score of < 5 whilst Sterling was man of the match with 7.8. I must have watched a different game.

 

[eyalluvitt]

Only one choice for me today

 

[Fiftyyearsandcounting]

According to the BBC website report of the game, Foden was City's worst player with a score of < 5 whilst Sterling was man of the match with 7.8. I must have watched a different game.

In fact, according to the same BBC poll, Phil was rated the worst player on the pitch -both sides!
Unbelievable Jeff!

 

[Stoned Rose]

Foden.

Extra points for his post match interview ;)

 

[cleavers]

However, I think it’s the publi's vote, rather than the BBC’s own ratings, which just goes to show how little the average armchair fan really knows about the game.

I think it tells more about the c**ts that bother to vote, so Sterling was one of our poorer players gets the highest vote, while Foden our best player gets worst player on the pitch. It'd also be nice to see how many people have voted to gauge how bias it was.

How many on here bothered ? It was already closed by 8pm, about 25 minutes after the final whistle, I cooked dinner after the game finished, the majority won't be City fans, just c**ts.

 

[SWPISHOME]

Foden for me, Always looked the most likely to be on the scoresheet. Rodri was brilliant tonight too.

 

[Eccles Blue]

John Boy for me. Let’s hope he starts against Burnley. Well done John Boy. Great stuff.

 

[super_city_si]

Philip.

 

[Shirley]

In fact, according to the same BBC poll, Phil was rated the worst player on the pitch -both sides!
Unbelievable Jeff!

Really strange times down at Salford, hopefully it’ll all come out in the wash.

 

[ninjamonkey]

Why would anybody even give the bbc player voting section a second thought? It’s not meant to be taken seriously, it’s nothing but a tool for rival fans to downvote players they dislike. Of course they’re going to downvote the 20 year old local kid who looks like being England’s best player for decades and who takes every chance he gets to mention how much he loves City. As petty as it is I would probably do the exact same thing for a United or Liverpool player. why it’s even getting a mention is beyond me.