journolud
Well-Known Member
The sooner the EU cave in and give us everything we want the better. I can’t understand the delay myselfNot going to happen.
It's good correography though as most of the deal was agreed weeks ago.
The sooner the EU cave in and give us everything we want the better. I can’t understand the delay myselfNot going to happen.
It's good correography though as most of the deal was agreed weeks ago.
The sooner the EU cave in and give us everything we want the better. I can’t understand the delay myself
Not like he needs a win or anything...A cynic may say that it’s set up nicely for Johnson to intervene and get the deal over the line.
Nice attempt at framing the narrative there.Are you all looking forward to WTO?
Going to happen unless the EU backs down.
"We will not see movement from the UK unless and until they are faced with the prospect of a viable walk-away option – and the political will to use it” - Macron1632Also - is this the mighty EU giving a slap to the French president for having the temerity to seek to look after France's interests as a sovereign nation?
EU chief urges members to stay united in Brexit talks | Money | Malay Mail
This comment:
"Some EU members — notably France and the Netherlands, whose boats fish in UK waters — are now concerned that Barnier and the European Commission will give too much ground in the final hours of talks."
Brought to mind a previously stated view that some posters have never been able to accept the truth of:
"We will not see movement from the EU unless and until they are faced with the prospect of a viable walk-away option – and the political will to use it”
I might have checked but the search facility has gone to pot, so I'll take your word for it that you were only commenting on Mogg's optimistic view that it might take 50 years to see the benefit of Brexit (or 50 minutes in his self-interested case). Most economists (and the Government if we could see their own forecasts, still supressed) think we'll never see a financial benefit.Show me the post and let's all see if you were/are twisting words
Certainly - if you can show that I have explicitly stated that it will require ".....50 years to see the benefit." - then you can be sure that I will have the strength of character to acknowledge that you were correct in your post.
If I only referred to Moggs comments, rather than expressed my own explicit view that it would take 50 years, can I be equally sure that you will have the strength of character to set the record straight ?
JRM's personal finacial benefit goes through the roof on Monday as he shorts the pound for his own gain.I might have checked but the search facility has gone to pot, so I'll take your word for it that you were only commenting on Mogg's optimistic view that it might take 50 years to see the benefit of Brexit (or 50 minutes in his self-interested case). Most economists (and the Government if we could see their own forecasts, still supressed) think we'll never see a financial benefit.
I think this pisses me off more than anything. Those confidently predicting the ‘easiest deal in history’ are the same cunts moaning when the EU try to lowball us. Anyone with a brain who wasn’t consumed with bile for the EU could see we weren’t holding many cards if we voted to leave.Looks like the no-deal press narrative is starting to creep in.
Number 1 - Blame The French.