LongsightM13
Well-Known Member
Literally shat on :)Just re-watching The Martian. Spuds took one hell of a beating there too.
Literally shat on :)Just re-watching The Martian. Spuds took one hell of a beating there too.
Totally agree with this analysis. I haven’t seen it commented on but it’s remarkable as this season has gone on, how many games we’ve won in the last 10-15 minutes through that solidity, belief and patience. The odd one slips by like Leeds but 9/10 we find a way to win the game, often by the odd goal. We’ve come from behind several times too in this way.Our game has changed from trying to outscore the opposition, as in you score 4 we'll score 5, to having a secure defence with a patient attritional possession designed to wear down the opposition not just physically but also mentally. Having an out and out striker who doesn't contribute to the possession and build up play but converts a higher percentage of chances isn't going to happen any time soon. All our players are ball players that score goals and that is how Pep likes them. I don't think he is going to sacrifice a place to an out and out goalscorer to the detriment of the possession.
Maybe if a better finishing version of Jesus came along that would be the ideal player.
As for entertainment, their is no better entertainment in football than winning football matches.
All IMHO of course.
It is surely between our Ruben and our Gundog for Player of the Year, although we all know it will probably go to some rag or some dipper.
I'd throw in Mason Mount to the mix for young player.YPOTY has to be between Dias & Foden, with Foden winning it!
Good call.I'd throw in Mason Mount to the mix for young player.
If Chelsea were to win FA Cup and Champions league, it would be a tight call.
Lots of good young players but Foden and Mount are peaking at the moment
Son? I think we are swayed by his performance against us earlier on this season. I looked at the Cup Final thread in one of the Spurs forums, and the consensus there is that Son has gone right off the boil these last few months.Fine player, but do we need him?
Er...Adebayor...;)What struck me at the time and it's just come back to me....if that was a raggy goal the player would have ran to the spurs lot to wind them up unlike us classy to the end.
Don’t forget JesseGood call.
Saka will be on the list, too.
Someone on TS called him “that kid Lingard” the other day.Don’t forget Jesse
Good call.
Saka will be on the list, too.
I think on balance you’re probably right. The only counter argument I could offer is that Haaland for example is so lethal that his presence alone will create more space for our artists to weave their magic thereby making up for a little less fluency in possession. More importantly i think Pep shares your thought process and so I doubt we’ll see any big money striker arriving anytime soon.Our game has changed from trying to outscore the opposition, as in you score 4 we'll score 5, to having a secure defence with a patient attritional possession designed to wear down the opposition not just physically but also mentally. Having an out and out striker who doesn't contribute to the possession and build up play but converts a higher percentage of chances isn't going to happen any time soon. All our players are ball players that score goals and that is how Pep likes them. I don't think he is going to sacrifice a place to an out and out goalscorer to the detriment of the possession.
Maybe if a better finishing version of Jesus came along that would be the ideal player.
As for entertainment, their is no better entertainment in football than winning football matches.
All IMHO of course.
We already have more than one way to play. Having a striker worthy of the team will only add to those options.I think on balance you’re probably right. The only counter argument I could offer is that Haaland for example is so lethal that his presence alone will create more space for our artists to weave their magic thereby making up for a little less fluency in possession. More importantly i think Pep shares your thought process and so I doubt we’ll see any big money striker arriving anytime soon.
Don’t get me wrong I’d love us to sign Haaland but the proof of the pudding’s in the eating and regardless of the outcome of the CL sf Pep has shown that playing with pretty much 8 midfielders is the best way to go. Maybe there’s an argument for him to reinvent our style again to make us even deadlier but I think that change will only come on the back of a disappointing season. He’s found the blueprint now and I think he’ll stick with it until circumstances change.We already have more than one way to play. Having a striker worthy of the team will only add to those options.
Or conversely, the reason we are sometimes playing without a striker is because the ones we have available aren’t up to the job. Sergio because of age/injuries and Jesus because he has failed to kick on. Not a chance Pep snookers himself into one rigid style of play and one less weapon at his disposal, especially when circumstances will allow him to replace Sergio thus summerDon’t get me wrong I’d love us to sign Haaland but the proof of the pudding’s in the eating and regardless of the outcome of the CL sf Pep has shown that playing with pretty much 8 midfielders is the best way to go. Maybe there’s an argument for him to reinvent our style again to make us even deadlier but I think that change will only come on the back of a disappointing season. He’s found the blueprint now and I think he’ll stick with it until circumstances change.
I think he is a very good player, despite a drop in form which is probably temporary. But we need a genuine striker whereas he is a second forward.Son? I think we are swayed by his performance against us earlier on this season. I looked at the Cup Final thread in one of the Spurs forums, and the consensus there is that Son has gone right off the boil these last few months.