United thread 2020/21

Status
Not open for further replies.
Glazer to meet rags via zoom at 17:00 Florida time....

He will be speaking directly to the chair of the Beijing supporters club.
 
Money is money wherever it comes from.
How is money from a Korean noodle sponsor more 'earned' than the sponsorships City have gained? BTW, if we win the CL, will not our 'earned' money shoot up a long, long way?
Rags are just bitter. They want to be on top of the tree again. They think it's theirs by divine right.
 
feedmpenzaandhewillscore said:
The City thread on rag cafe is a joy to behold playing down Pep’s achievements because of the money spent. I would imagine the same posters are upset that the Glazers should be spending even more money on United to add to the billion quid spent to win the Europa League.
Click to expand...
And when people raise about how little difference there is between our spend and the Rags they always come up with the argument that we had a much better squad full of world class players where they needed a full rebuild.

However if anyone cares to look at their thread below after Pep and Peg's first season you can see they didn't think so at the time, it was only when they turned to shit that they started trotting out this line

Which of the Top 6 Teams Has the Strongest Squad for the 2017/2018 Season? Manchester United? | RedCafe.net

Just a few quotes from the first page alone:
Man Utd
Definitely us.
I think it's close between us and City with Chelsea creeping in too.
Pound for pound balance wise probably United.
Us and City. But I would go for us as it seems we have better defensive cover.
One thing I would say is our depth stands out, but the quality of the top 6 is fairly similar across the board. A lot will depend on the star players and the solidity of the defences. Maybe injuries too.
City or us. This may be biased, but I'd give us a slight edge, as City's big question marks are in the spine of their team, while ours are caused more by width. In general, I'll side with the team that has the better G-CBs-CMs-#9 combo. All teams but Arsenal can realistically challenge for the title. I'd probably go.
We do. City's defense is suspect and they lack bite in midfield
United have the most balanced squad out of the contending teams topped with José as manager which is hard to bet against.
City lack a good centre-back and a defensive midfielder to be considered as the best. Chelsea has a very good squad, probably needing just someone else instead of Drinkwater in the middle (Matic). Spurs are solid, but mentally weak.
So I would say it's between us and Chelsea.
 
abu13 said:
And when people raise about how little difference there is between our spend and the Rags they always come up with the argument that we had a much better squad full of world class players where they needed a full rebuild.

However if anyone cares to look at their thread below after Pep and Peg's first season you can see they didn't think so at the time, it was only when they turned to shit that they started trotting out this line

Which of the Top 6 Teams Has the Strongest Squad for the 2017/2018 Season? Manchester United? | RedCafe.net

Just a few quotes from the first page alone:
Man Utd
Definitely us.
I think it's close between us and City with Chelsea creeping in too.
Pound for pound balance wise probably United.
Us and City. But I would go for us as it seems we have better defensive cover.
One thing I would say is our depth stands out, but the quality of the top 6 is fairly similar across the board. A lot will depend on the star players and the solidity of the defences. Maybe injuries too.
City or us. This may be biased, but I'd give us a slight edge, as City's big question marks are in the spine of their team, while ours are caused more by width. In general, I'll side with the team that has the better G-CBs-CMs-#9 combo. All teams but Arsenal can realistically challenge for the title. I'd probably go.
We do. City's defense is suspect and they lack bite in midfield
United have the most balanced squad out of the contending teams topped with José as manager which is hard to bet against.
City lack a good centre-back and a defensive midfielder to be considered as the best. Chelsea has a very good squad, probably needing just someone else instead of Drinkwater in the middle (Matic). Spurs are solid, but mentally weak.
So I would say it's between us and Chelsea.
Click to expand...
They make you laugh, don’t they?
 
James Morgan said:
AC Milan arguably the best team they’ve beaten over 2 legs this season (I’m including the CL group stages as 2 legged ties here), and AC Milan are a bunch of farmers with a big bloke with a big nose up front.
Click to expand...
And the big nosed **** up front wasn't even fit enough to ply against them :)
 
Well I do remember the rags playing those European Giants Besiktas whose 36 year old centre forward ambled from well inside his own half the full length of the pitch to slot home against them...

Funnily enough he's the very same centre forward that slippy G gave the ball to when he slipped on his fkin arse in a rather important game, this after said slippy G had told his players live on SKY, in front of the watching millions that they mustn't let it slip..!

Comedy Gold..!

The good news for the rags though was that the 2-1 loss in Turkey went a long way in helping them qualify for the Europa League losers cup..

However, teams such as Bayern, PSG, Juventus, Porto, Barcelona, Madrid, i'kkle ciddy, Dortmund etc are deemed too good to enter the Europa League losers cup which is fkin good news for the rags and their £650 million pound squad..

Apparently, reaching the final of the Europa League losers cup is a fantastic achievement according to the sycophantic media in the UK..!
 
Aba452 said:
But at least you've got to a Europa final that's very winnable against some Spanish 'nanas. But oddly enough the world and his dog aren't asking about travel restrictions and ticketing for Gdansk.

Because literally no one gives a shit.
Click to expand...
I legitimately let out a large laugh reading this part.
 
They've lost their new training shirt contract with Hut Group over THG's fears about fan repercussions over the Glazers/ESL. £200m they've lost and got to find a replacement for before July.

www.theguardian.com

Manchester United lose £200m training kit deal over fans’ anti-Glazers campaign

Manchester United have missed out on a proposed new training kit deal worth £200m over 10 years with The Hut Group, the Observer understands
www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com
 
Last edited:
Get the fuckers giddy they are going to get revenge for Agueroooooooooooo.

Then Serge buries the cunts hopes and dreams again before fucking off to Spain.

I bet they aren't too fussed about protesting whilst they think they have a sniff again.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top