Harry Kane

[PannickAtTheDisco]

Would getting him mean Haaland 100% going to another club? If so I hope we'll not be regretting this move for the next decade.

let's be honest, if we're getting Kane it's because we're not getting Haaland regardless.

 

[southamptonblue]

If that's the case then fine.

Apparently was the case.....but as we know, things can change, having been beaten home and away by us recently, and our performances i don't believe for a second he wouldn't have another think about If he wanted to move....not necessarily change his mind though.

 

[hgblue]

let's be honest, if we're getting Kane it's because we're not getting Haaland regardless.

I think City fans need to be open minded about the possibility that we’ve been tracking Kane for years and he’s our number one target.

 

[waspish]

Spurs could miss out on a world record fee for Harry Kane and his earning power limited if a deal is not done this summer, with Uefa set to introduce tough new regulations to curb transfer fees and wages.



Story

1f447.svg





Spurs could lose out on Kane record fee if Uefa enforces new curbs on spending

inews.co.uk

 

[blueparrot]

Doesn't want to be here.

18 year old Mbappe didn't, 22 year old Mbappe moving away from Paris, who knows.

 

[jay laruja]

Anyone else caught a whiff of that article that suggests that we get Kane for Gabby + Ake + £60m

I don't even think I'd do Kane for Gabby straight up.

 

[DiscoSteve]

Would getting him mean Haaland 100% going to another club? If so I hope we'll not be regretting this move for the next decade.

Fair point

 

[Ghost of 76]

Don't worry, IF he signs for us, the narrative would change quickly.

He would lose the England captaincy and he would become a money grabbing, greedy bastard.

Just look what happened to Raheem Sterling.

And the media would finally start calling him out for being the biggest cheat in the league!

 

[oh right]

Anyone else caught a whiff of that article that suggests that we get Kane for Gabby + Ake + £60m

I don't even think I'd do Kane for Gabby straight up.

Hahahahahaahahaaahahah

 

[nmc]

And if signing him allows Haaland to join a domestic rival?

If Haarland stays put till next summer I’ve a feeling he’s Munich bound.

 

[nmc]

Kane will perform well in the PL for sure . . but Haaland maybe not so well - look at Werner posted better stats in the little pond of the German league than Haaland but certainly not out performing Kane in the bigger pond of the PL.

Would take Haarland time to adapt to the PL and City’s way of playing but he has everything in his locker to be a very effective striker in any league.

 

[Gumzy97]

Rags not going for Kane can't afford him, they are going all in on Sancho.

 

[Coatigan]

Doesn't want to be here.

Based on that one thing he said that one time on how he chose to stay in France when he was like 17?

 

[nmc]

I'm starting to want him over Haaland just for that reason. The scum bags in the media wouldn't know what to do with themselves would they. Can you imagine the media darling that is Harry Kane playing for Man City and like you say the the best young talent this country has produced in years playing for the team the whole British media despises. For that reason alone I think I want us to sign him!

Hope it gets done before the Euro’s to witness the media’s about turn and see them start criticising Harry’s every move.... will give Raz a break.

 

[southamptonblue]

Rags not going for Kane can't afford him, they are going all in on Sancho.

You seem very sure......do you work in the Scums accounts office?

 

[Coatigan]

I think City fans need to be open minded about the possibility that we’ve been tracking Kane for years and he’s our number one target.

That I can well and truly believe.

 

[Coatigan]

Anyone else caught a whiff of that article that suggests that we get Kane for Gabby + Ake + £60m

I don't even think I'd do Kane for Gabby straight up.

Certainly wouldn't swap kane for gabby.

 

[BlueRockape]

I also said the last 3 SEASONS.In fact if you look back he has actually played more than most City players !!

Mate I couldn't really give a shit which one ( if any ) we buy short term......long term Haaland

 

[Gumzy97]

You seem very sure......do you work in the Scums accounts office?

Was scrolling through Dortmund twitter, Dortmund want 80 to 110 million for Sancho, Tolmie also said they can't afford him, Gollum wants Sancho over anything else, they have also re signed cavani who's on a hefty wage. Put two and two together where are they going to get 120 mil for Kane?

 

[oh right]

Certainly wouldn't swap kane for gabby.

Gabby who doesn’t even feature in this side anymore in a game of any importance wouldn’t be swapped for a 3 time golden boot winner with a better goal to game ratio than Agüero.

Thank fuck people like you don’t make the big decisions at this football club.