Gundog’s Gundog
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 6 Apr 2021
- Messages
- 1,182
- Team supported
- City
Sell him now from a position of strength. He’s been a good servant but we need something different now.
Where is this £350,000 p/w figure coming from?You'd have no problem with a player signing a new deal worth probably 350k per week to put in more performances like last night for years to come? I can't quite comprehend the fact there's a debate on this, he has to go. End of. He's earning match-winning, game changing, season defining money and he doesn't even get in our strongest eleven.
That depends though, i heard a rumour yesterday that if Pochettino goes to Madrid he wants Sterling, i think that would suit all parties!Nobody is gonna pay what we would want for him or they won't meet his salary demands. I think he will walk for free at the end of his current deal.
prob guess work but Tolm said he is already on £300k/week at the momentWhere is this £350,000 p/w figure coming from?
That figure is down to bonuses. He doesn't earn that muchprob guess work but Tolm said he is already on £300k/week at the moment
Do you know for sure or are you assuming?That figure is down to bonuses. He doesn't earn that much
Do you know for sure or are you assuming?
Fair enough. Not sure how the independent would know the ins and outs mind![]()
Raheem Sterling signs new Manchester City contract until 2023
Sterling will only earn the maximum £300,000-a-week figure if bonus clauses - which include winning the Balon d'Or - are metwww.independent.co.uk
If he doesn't accept City's new deal then he should be moved on.Fair enough. Not sure how the independent would know the ins and outs mind
Edit. there should be no way City enhance that
Just hope City box clever on thisIf he doesn't accept City's new deal then he should be moved on.
Is there much of a market at the min though? I’m not sure there is and we won’t want to sell him on the cheap.If he doesn't accept City's new deal then he should be moved on.
You'd have no problem with a player signing a new deal worth probably 350k per week to put in more performances like last night for years to come? I can't quite comprehend the fact there's a debate on this, he has to go. End of. He's earning match-winning, game changing, season defining money and he doesn't even get in our strongest eleven.
I think City would as what is the alternative?Is there much of a market at the min though? I’m not sure there is and we won’t want to sell him on the cheap.