Harry Kane

[Bluemanc100]

All things considered i think we did alright without him...

But you’d have liked us to sign him wouldn’t you?

 

[Bluemanc100]

Hazard??? Not a success in my opinion

Not a success at Chelsea??

 

[oakiecokie]

My grandad used to say turning the pages of the Sun does not amount to reading a newspaper!

Hahahahhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa love that one melrose and never heard it before.

 

[Elliot houghton]

Aguero on a 1-2 year extention and then worry about getting haaland when he costs less. I think i'd have taken ings in the short term even...if it meant getting haaland next year. Torres just scored a bunch for spain at the euro's playing as a forward...

Not to mention a bevvy of youngsters that we could have chanced(like daka).

Maybe but even Haaland next year would cost us 600k a week I'm not sure we'll ever pay that Daka might have been good but a risk as never playing in a top league before

 

[Bill Walker]

Yep, because no club has ever had two top strikers at the same time lol ..do I really have to spell it out to you? rotation, they would both play a lot of games each and a good chance one will be injured at some point

Well now that you mention it, Kane does look fucked these days

 

[blueparrot]

Not a success at Chelsea??

He did okay at Chelsea, and Chelsea , but us missing out also wasn't any disaster either wed did okay too.

 

[Nascent Blues]

He would def sign for City if we could get Dortmund to agree, but it may actually be that Pep fancies Kane more for the way he wants to play. He's got us this far and most of his buys have worked.

Which pretty much sums up my stance: be positive about the top class player that it looks like we will get and which the top brass at the club (including Pep) want, rather than a top class player we won't get, whether for the reasons that the club/Pep don't fancy him, or he just doesn't want to come, or any other reason the fans aren't privy to.

 

[Brewster's millions]

Personally I’d be happy if we didn’t spend any major money this summer - I don’t think that the transfer market can withstand another year of COVID disruption and our comparative advantage - our finances - will only increase. I have a particular dislike for Spurs so I have no real desire to see us bail them out on the financial side.

Without sounding like a prophet of doom, I would also think that the current wave of COVID may have altered our transfer plans somewhat, given the risk of reduced crowds etc. The outlook now is different from the spring when the vaccine rollout started, and the affordability of some of our transfer targets has probably reduced as a result.

 

[Bluemanc100]

Personally I’d be happy if we didn’t spend any major money this summer - I don’t think that the transfer market can withstand another year of COVID disruption and our comparative advantage - our finances - will only increase. I have a particular dislike for Spurs so I have no real desire to see us bail them out on the financial side.

Without sounding like a prophet of doom, I would also think that the current wave of COVID may have altered our transfer plans somewhat, given the risk of reduced crowds etc. The outlook now is different from the spring when the vaccine rollout started, and the affordability of some of our transfer targets has probably reduced as a result.

It’s double jeopardy for me… I don’t want Kane and I want to boost Spud’s coffers even less

 

[philjoneswho?]

That is true.

Though my is point missed, I am not criticisim Cityxtra and the job they do

They have tweeted several times today with city news only the two of there post have been shared, the ones with the most untrustworthy sources so, I was ctiticising the repetative sharing of the same bollocks story they link by posters here not them lomking it.


But I seem to have offened you and some with a gif, I am so sorry that it was taken so badly by some.

Looks like Happy Hour where you are pal...

 

[oldhamblue]

We'll know when it's done. It's when reports come out the rags are in for him. That's the final clickbait frenzy of the story before it's announced

 

[Paulmcfc2703]

It’s double jeopardy for me… I don’t want Kane and I want to boost Spud’s coffers even less

Spurs are of no threat to us.

 

[CC1]

Not a success at Chelsea??

was ok certainly but not one I was bothered about not having in our team

 

[Hart of the Matter]

That is true.

Though my is point missed, I am not criticisim Cityxtra and the job they do

They have tweeted several times today with city news only the two of there post have been shared, the ones with the most untrustworthy sources so, I was ctiticising the repetative sharing of the same bollocks story they link by posters here not them lomking it.


But I seem to have offened you and some with a gif, I am so sorry that it was taken so badly by some.

My comment was tongue in cheek. Not offended, but my humour not well placed given the 'heat' on this forum today ;-)

 

[Gorton_Tubster]

How have we the poorer deal?

£160m on a 28yr old v £160m on a 20yr old. Both of equal potential

 

[Gorton_Tubster]

How can you spend £160m on a player that doesn’t want to come? I’m pretty sure the club would have evaluated which is the better deal, but if Haaland isn’t 100% commited, that’s a big put off.

Absolutely. If he doesn't want to play here none of it matters, we must go for kane. (or mbappe but that's my secret wish)

 

[urban genie]

My comment was tongue in cheek. Not offended, but my humour not well placed given the 'heat' on this forum today ;-)

It's more safer on the political forum today than here ;-)

 

[Nascent Blues]

Personally I’d be happy if we didn’t spend any major money this summer - I don’t think that the transfer market can withstand another year of COVID disruption and our comparative advantage - our finances - will only increase. I have a particular dislike for Spurs so I have no real desire to see us bail them out on the financial side.

Without sounding like a prophet of doom, I would also think that the current wave of COVID may have altered our transfer plans somewhat, given the risk of reduced crowds etc. The outlook now is different from the spring when the vaccine rollout started, and the affordability of some of our transfer targets has probably reduced as a result.

Without sounding facetious, I'm pretty certain the people who run our club have got a handle on the economic situation, and if they deem Kane as a viable option, both short and long term, then that's all we need to worry about.

 

[bobbyowenquiff]

Last season we won the league, the league cup, got to the final of the CL and the semi final of the FA Cup. We also won 21 games in a row - an all time English record. On top of this we had the best defensive record in the league.

We don’t seem to be doing too bad with this ‘major’ weakness.

Agree 100 per cent but we did lose six league games and blew the CL Final because of it.

 

[Utter bobbins]

£160m on a 28yr old v £160m on a 20yr old. Both of equal potential

One wants to play for City the other doesn’t, devils advocate