Oh they would. They are probably counting on the evidence of a decade of weakness in defending the club’s reputationI assume there's not much City can do about it, I doubt the DM would be dumb enough to print this if they thought they were susceptible to legal action.
Oh they would. They are probably counting on the evidence of a decade of weakness in defending the club’s reputation
Blocked by the courts, not City. We refused to engage with them previously and they decided unilaterally not to risk publicationUnfortunately the weakness you're talking about only exists in the paranoid minds of bluemoon posters who like to pretend the club does nothing to protect itself.
In the real world we've had plenty of journalists say they were blocked from running stories by City's legal department, including the Mail reporters on this story.

They call it a dramatic dispatch from their reportet published four days after the Court Judgement itself which reveals all the details.The Daily United hatchet job. The rag and it’s journalists have been building up to this.
View attachment 21886
The Daily United had the only reporter in court.
Are City finally going to ban this Rag fanzine piece of sh*t from the Etihad once and for all?
You absolute c*nts!
Absolutely fuck all. Like most of Nick Harris’ major Mail on Sunday ‘exposes’.Er Sorry to sound a bit thick
But what happens next as a result of all this?
Absolutely fuck all. Like most of Nick Harris’ major Mail on Sunday ‘exposes’.
It’s little more than the death rattle of the WhatsApp group. Predictably, the usual suspects, the G14 and redshirt shills and mouthpieces like Panja and Evans are all weighing in with their ‘expert’ analysis
Absolutely. He is derangedI suspect that, deep down, Harris knows what the outcome to all this will be. It's one last desperate attempt to influence the Court of public opinion.
AhaAbsolutely fuck all. Like most of Nick Harris’ major Mail on Sunday ‘exposes’.
It’s little more than the death rattle of the WhatsApp group. Predictably, the usual suspects, the G14 and redshirt shills and mouthpieces like Panja and Evans are all weighing in with their ‘expert’ analysis
Surely if I've just released a hit piece on Man City the last thing I'd want is for people to think I'm incredibly biased about the whole thing?Meanwhile, Harris shows his true colours as a bad faith writer motivated by malice
View attachment 21888
Well it pretty much destroys any pretence of impartiality and credibilitySurely if I've just released a hit piece on Man City the last thing I'd want is for people to think I'm incredibly biased about the whole thing?
I had a joke in mind on this, but then I realised that was impossible due to me being an empty heard cretin. Hopefully when Nick is scrolling though the forum in the morning he appreciates my humility despite being a dirty, dirty, City fan.
High time these fools were put in their place, it's gone on too long and the club needs to be far more proactive fighting and upholding our reputation.Oh they would. They are probably counting on the evidence of a decade of weakness in defending the club’s reputation
Er Sorry to sound a bit thick
But what happens next as a result of all this?
And he’s a fat little virgin.Meanwhile, Harris shows his true colours as a bad faith writer motivated by malice
View attachment 21888