CAS judgement: UEFA ban overturned, City exonerated (report out p603)

Fordyboy46 said:
Wow, open day on City today doesn't even come in to it. That fucking snake Nick Harris doing his best to bring it out in the open hoping City get charged by the prem league. What a **** of the highest order
Click to expand...
What’s he bringing out in the open?
It’s the same story on a fucking loop round and round and round again
 
Manchester_lalala said:
He’s just put a big fuck off target on his head.
Click to expand...
All because City proved him and his bitter, deluded crew wrong.

I do wonder why the Mail would run such and article as there‘s no longer any traction with this story. Even the PL want this to go away and probably wished they’d never opened the enquiry.
 
Harris has obviously gone out of the way on this attack, done a lot of background and secret work, and is involved with Pinto’s lawyers.

So Pinto, via his lawyers, is still hell bent on helping another football governing body, this time the PL

It’s clear as day what Pinto, his lawyers, Harris and the Daily United are up to.


Here's a potential kicker for Man City's fate. Pinto's lawyers have told me he is willing to help the Premier League in any investigation into alleged Man City wrong-doing. Back page, MoS.
 
Unfortunately Harris has whipped up the City haters again on his Twitter page. Everyone calling City cheats, tainted trophies, trophies to be taken away, wanting future point deductions, fines, etc. No doubt the comment sections on his articles in the Daily United are also the same.

Kane and Gralish will have seen this. And Levy, Spurs, and Villa will no doubt mention this in some context during their negotiations with both players when they get back from their holidays.
 
didn't they use say today's headlines are tomorrow chip paper
its the one thing i hate about modern day life of the internet. the recycling of old chip paper
 
Can someone remind me how we explained the 2013 Baumgartner/Pearce email, in which the latter (with his EAA hat on) noted that Etihad only needed to provide £8m out of their £99m sponsorship and that the EAA would take care of the rest? I’ve forgotten
 
Exeter Blue I am here said:
Can someone remind me how we explained the Baumgartner/Pearce email, in which the latter (with his EAA hat on) noted that Etihad only needed to provide £8m out of their £99m sponsorship and that the EAA would take care of the rest? I’ve forgotten
Click to expand...

Very simply, the email was just an email of what 'could' be done. It was not proof that the transaction was actually executed in the way Pearce said.

Stefan explained it better in this thread.

 
JASR said:
So, after a period of quiet, the ‘story’ around, what is it, 6 emails , 1 of which was a cut&paste of 2 different ones, rumbles on from the great ‘football leaks’ multiple clubs hacking.

100,000’s (or was it millions?) of emails, and yet here we are 4 years down the line , and only one clubs emails have been published, to whit, a grand total of 6 of them, which follow a made up narrative to stitch up a singular club.

it is beyond the realms of any belief, that zero other stories (football finance or otherwise, eg just gossip) have been published about our club, let alone any other club… it’s clearly a singular targeted attacking bullshit… but apparently it’s City that are tinfoil hat wearing according to the masses.
Click to expand...
Footyleaks apparently involved 18.6 million digital documents, probably hundreds of millions of emails. There have been lots of stories including the Ronaldo rape allegations but no one has been targeted in the media as much as City. Most of Pinto's 90 charges relate to clubs and agents in Portugal where he has also been accused of hacking into the Portugese Ministry of Justice itself while they were investigating him. There is no suggestion Pinto targeted MCFC. City's emails were just a tiny minute fraction of a huge cache.
The question I would ask is why are the Premier League pursuing City because of a handful of inconclusive and stolen emails which relate to our finances as far back as 2010/11 three years before the PL introduced the FFP rules.
These are apparently the same allegations (based on today's Mail on Sunday) which were dismissed by CAS. One of the emails had been "fabricated" and the others showed "no evidence" of wrongdoing and in any case were past the date when any action could be taken (more than six years old).
Another question I would ask is why did the PL support City's attempts to prevent publication of the detailed legal discussions? Is it because, like UEFA, they actually don't have any evidence against City and are just prolonging the process to further damage our reputation?
 
Last edited:
bobmcfc said:
Never ending is it.
Click to expand...
There's 3 articles high up in the Fail today basically calling our club cheats.
Bringing us into disrepute.
I'd like to know what our media/PR dept are doing to counter these insinuations.
Rags and victim fans are of course having a field day.
Its even being reported here in Australia.
I'm thinking if we now spunk 350 million on Grealish and Kane we'll be throwing petrol on the flames.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top