And possibly any other player/club that we may have negotiations with..I personally think this is the thinking behind it.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
CAS judgement: UEFA ban overturned, City exonerated (report out p603)
- Thread starter jimharri
- Start date
Prestwich_Blue
Well-Known Member
You can't put your fingers in your ears and shout loudly, hoping it'll all go away. It may be pissing into the wind but the truth needs to be told and his credibility shredded. If you don't want to be part of that then that's your perogative entirely.Well done blues on giving this guy all the credibility and satisfaction he craves.
But you're the guy telling us not to respond to the Guardian and others, but then posts the articles we aren't supposed to respond to.
SilverFox2
Well-Known Member
No other media organisation has bothered with it. None. Because they know it is the same old same old horse shit.
Nick Harris consoling himself with kind words from his fellow City haters, like the unemployable drunk Charlie Bingham
But surely the DM know this as well which contradicts their publications?
Seemingly they are not desperate for income so apart from being paid by the usual suspects to regurgitate lies why would they print this?
Sir peace frog
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 9 Jan 2009
- Messages
- 18,879
- Location
- stalking the canals and rivers
- Team supported
- Manchester City Football Club
im all for knowledgable people having a go at them (facts wise) what i don't like is the name calling, that takes away any good that has been done, pile in on him twitter blues, keep it clean and factual, he will look like a no nothing ****You can't put your fingers in your ears and shout loudly, hoping it'll all go away. It may be pissing into the wind but the truth needs to be told and his credibility shredded. If you don't want to be part of that then that's your perogative entirely.
But you're the guy telling us not to respond to the Guardian and others, but then posts the articles we aren't supposed to respond to.
Prestwich_Blue
Well-Known Member
I'd guess Harris needs the money as his Sporting Intelligence company is dormant. It may also be that he's been put up to it by the usual suspects. The Mail aren't going to cast a critical eye over this, in the way that me and others have. They don't know FFP from shit but they think Harris does. All they see is clicks from Liverpool & United fans and we know the lengths they'll go to to get those. No one else has touched this, whereas normally they'd be all over an "exclusive", rehashing it for their own papers. Yet nada, which tells me that every other so-called "quality" paper sees this as embarrassing nonsense. The Mail, sadly, isn't capable of embarrassment.But surely the DM know this as well which contradicts their publications?
Seemingly they are not desperate for income so apart from being paid by the usual suspects to regurgitate lies why would they print this?
The only worry I've got over this is that our US-owned friends are using the same tactics that have served them so well over the years at UEFA. Threaten a breakaway to get what you want. That tactic got us the 2-season ban in the first place after all. And the clubs have shown that the threat is real, following the abortive Super League announcement. The lines are drawn in that battle now and any future breakaway effectively means the end of the PL as a major sporting competition and commercial entity.
We already know that FSG are not just amoral, but totally immoral. The Glazers are just plain dumb and will go along with whatever John Henry tells them. So it wouldn't surprise me in the slightest if their grubby prints were all over this and that's the reason we started the legal fight, complaining about impartiality and handing over documents, which we knew would fall straight into the hands of our enemies.
Fordyboy46
Well-Known Member
Isn't Rob Harris also another twat of the highest order. Something with that surname obviously?
Alan Harper's Tash
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 70,449
Bit like their dad, Rolf.Isn't Rob Harris also another twat of the highest order. Something with that surname obviously?
Bill
Well-Known Member
no no there is no agenda remember .Clear and OBVIOUS agenda.
M18CTID
Well-Known Member
There’s nothing to tell, but he doesn’t know that!Hmmm tell us more!?
Bill
Well-Known Member
100% it is .And possibly any other player/club that we may have negotiations with..I personally think this is the thinking behind it.
Two desperate men, if Pinto had slam dunk information on City why has he held it back to now and didn’t sell it to Der Spiegal? Methinks it’s a bluff to delay the book being thrown at him for being a blackmailer.
I have no idea how he is allowed to tweet if he's under house arrest and some form of witness protection.
nmc
Well-Known Member
Well done blues on giving this guy all the credibility and satisfaction he craves.
This…. How to make an attention seeker who knows fuck all - feel important.
Fallen flat apart from the Mail and Harris revamped story of old newd not mentioned on any other main stteam media outlets. Another attempt to divert the fact we are about to signed big named players to continue our dominance . No further post from me on the subject because this is the exactly what Harris is wanting for us to get our knickers in a twist about sad and tired old news. Also apparently his own company is in financial difficulties from what I've heard so let's hope he's homeless soon !Bit like their dad, Rolf.
This…. How to make an attention seeker who knows fuck all - feel important.
As PB has said we can't just ignore it and hope it goes away. Unless he's lurking here, which he probably is, then he won't know we're talking about it. But as it's a football forum and it's our club under attack for the umpteenth time, of course we're going to discuss it.
If we have to stop talking about our club just to stop some random knobhead from feeling important I'd rather he feel important.This…. How to make an attention seeker who knows fuck all - feel important.
Not talking about the club affects me, whether Nick Harris feels important or not I don't give a toss.
manimanc
Well-Known Member
Is there such thing as a 'quality' paper?I'd guess Harris needs the money as his Sporting Intelligence company is dormant. It may also be that he's been put up to it by the usual suspects. The Mail aren't going to cast a critical eye over this, in the way that me and others have. They don't know FFP from shit but they think Harris does. All they see is clicks from Liverpool & United fans and we know the lengths they'll go to to get those. No one else has touched this, whereas normally they'd be all over an "exclusive", rehashing it for their own papers. Yet nada, which tells me that every other so-called "quality" paper sees this as embarrassing nonsense. The Mail, sadly, isn't capable of embarrassment.
The only worry I've got over this is that our US-owned friends are using the same tactics that have served them so well over the years at UEFA. Threaten a breakaway to get what you want. That tactic got us the 2-season ban in the first place after all. And the clubs have shown that the threat is real, following the abortive Super League announcement. The lines are drawn in that battle now and any future breakaway effectively means the end of the PL as a major sporting competition and commercial entity.
We already know that FSG are not just amoral, but totally immoral. The Glazers are just plain dumb and will go along with whatever John Henry tells them. So it wouldn't surprise me in the slightest if their grubby prints were all over this and that's the reason we started the legal fight, complaining about impartiality and handing over documents, which we knew would fall straight into the hands of our enemies.
They are all piles of bitter shite.
And I loved your response to nobhead Harris on twitter, brilliant read.
Newman Noggs
Well-Known Member
The only worry I've got over this is that our US-owned friends are using the same tactics that have served them so well over the years at UEFA. Threaten a breakaway to get what you want. That tactic got us the 2-season ban in the first place after all. And the clubs have shown that the threat is real, following the abortive Super League announcement. The lines are drawn in that battle now and any future breakaway effectively means the end of the PL as a major sporting competition and commercial entity.
For me, this is the key. The Premier League controls its own processes. There is, as I understand it, no recourse to CAS, only, in exceptional circumstances, to the High Court.
Since the Premier League, in turn, is controlled by clubs who all have something to gain out of financially ruining City there will be nothing fair about the process at all. Anyone who thinks they will find "no case to answer" is, I'm afraid, mistaken.
In my opinion, this one is going to run for years yet.
Saddleworth2
Well-Known Member
No mention in the fail today. Will be nothing but fish and chip wrapping by now.
There is always recourse in law.For me, this is the key. The Premier League controls its own processes. There is, as I understand it, no recourse to CAS, only, in exceptional circumstances, to the High Court.
Since the Premier League, in turn, is controlled by clubs who all have something to gain out of financially ruining City there will be nothing fair about the process at all. Anyone who thinks they will find "no case to answer" is, I'm afraid, mistaken.
In my opinion, this one is going to run for years yet.
Centurions
Well-Known Member
Might just as well be his PR firm (also known as his lawyers) as they keep pushing the whistle-blower angle.I have no idea how he is allowed to tweet if he's under house arrest and some form of witness protection.
Edit: you'd have thought that he wasn't allowed access to a smart phone or computer.