The RNLI

What Should The RNLI Do?

  • 3. I’m a GB News Viewer and want Option 2 televised.

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    86
  • Poll closed .
Ask a stupid question, get a stupid answer.

The proper answer is save people and obey the law, but that’s not on the list.

In fact the question poses a kind of Farage-style trap where the only answer to an issue is an extreme one. Saving people at sea in UK waters doesn’t breach any law, so to suggest the alternative courses of action are either illegality or the death of innocents is a nonsense.

The current situation of a charitably funded largely volunteer organisation having to try save increasing numbers at sea will lead to deaths sooner or later. The question shouldn’t be whether we let that situation continue or not, but how we stop it. However, that’s a practical question, so I don’t expect any answer to it as this is a complex real world issue not a false black and white moral debate.

charitably funded means it can maintain its "services" - charity is what we do well - think Red Nose Day, Children in Need, the Poppy Appeal...... were it centrally Govt funded how many RNLI lifeboat stations would have been closed in the name of austerity? Do you not think Patel would have maintained that as a Govt dept ( which is what it would have become ) that the right thing to do is NOT save certain types of people crossing the channel? You do realise that there are RNLI stations in NI and the RoI? Throw Brexit into that mix and think how the UK Govt trying to manipulate life saving services there !!??

This lot have closed plenty of Coastguard Stations in the last 11 years in the name of "progress" - charitably funded is not outdated its the only way we can ensure the RNLI continues and continues to be run by professionals.
 
charitably funded means it can maintain its "services" - charity is what we do well - think Red Nose Day, Children in Need, the Poppy Appeal...... were it centrally Govt funded how many RNLI lifeboat stations would have been closed in the name of austerity? Do you not think Patel would have maintained that as a Govt dept ( which is what it would have become ) that the right thing to do is NOT save certain types of people crossing the channel? You do realise that there are RNLI stations in NI and the RoI? Throw Brexit into that mix and think how the UK Govt trying to manipulate life saving services there !!??

This lot have closed plenty of Coastguard Stations in the last 11 years in the name of "progress" - charitably funded is not outdated its the only way we can ensure the RNLI continues and continues to be run by professionals.
I agree, my point wasn’t that there is an issue with charitable funding, and as a long time supporter and frequent visitor to lifeboat stations I was aware of the stations in NI and the RoI, as well as the international work they do.

The reason I mentioned charitable funding was to highlight that this is an organisation with limited financial resources (£200k extra donations don’t go far when the boats cost £3m each, and they still need volunteers to crew them) so it can’t necessarily respond to significant increases in demand for its services.
 
Ask a stupid question, get a stupid answer.

The proper answer is save people and obey the law, but that’s not on the list.

In fact the question poses a kind of Farage-style trap where the only answer to an issue is an extreme one. Saving people at sea in UK waters doesn’t breach any law, so to suggest the alternative courses of action are either illegality or the death of innocents is a nonsense.

The current situation of a charitably funded largely volunteer organisation having to try save increasing numbers at sea will lead to deaths sooner or later. The question shouldn’t be whether we let that situation continue or not, but how we stop it. However, that’s a practical question, so I don’t expect any answer to it as this is a complex real world issue not a false black and white moral debate.
I assume you're aware of the plan to remove "and for gain" from the law which would make helping migrants a criminal offence for anyone, not just people smugglers.

"I was obeying the law of the sea" might be a defence but it would still be an offence in law.

Actually, given our donations to the RNLI you could argue they are now rescuing people for gain!
 
I assume you're aware of the plan to remove "and for gain" from the law which would make helping migrants a criminal offence for anyone, not just people smugglers.

"I was obeying the law of the sea" might be a defence but it would still be an offence in law.

Actually, given our donations to the RNLI you could argue they are now rescuing people for gain!

Ha ha ha ha - looking forward to the clogged courts system dealing with those millions of incitement to and accomplice to cases forth coming
 
I assume you're aware of the plan to remove "and for gain" from the law which would make helping migrants a criminal offence for anyone, not just people smugglers.

"I was obeying the law of the sea" might be a defence but it would still be an offence in law.

Actually, given our donations to the RNLI you could argue they are now rescuing people for gain!
I don’t think that is the intention of the law (the government have said it is not), and it’s not been passed in its current form yet. It’s also not clear if delivering rescued people to border control at Dover would in anyway breach the law as they’ve not arrived in the UK under the law at that point.

Certainly there’s a lot of hysteria about this but ultimately even if passed in its current form it wouldn’t make the UK law any tougher than the law as applied in Italy or other parts of the EU, which are hardly seen as unacceptably draconian and unwelcoming nations.
 
I don’t think that is the intention of the law (the government have said it is not), and it’s not been passed in its current form yet. It’s also not clear if delivering rescued people to border control at Dover would in anyway breach the law as they’ve not arrived in the UK under the law at that point.

Certainly there’s a lot of hysteria about this but ultimately even if passed in its current form it wouldn’t make the UK law any tougher than the law as applied in Italy or other parts of the EU, which are hardly seen as unacceptably draconian and unwelcoming nations.
"The government have said it is not".

That's the flaw in that argument.
 
You'll get banned,for not agreeing with the bluemoon commie party line.That's how it works.If a Volga pulls up in front of your home.You will probably,never be seen again.
Have you voted on the subject yet, or do you just want your 15 seconds of fame by putting in your moronic reply?
Oh, and Volga's aren't allowed on British roads, as they fail the emissions test, as did the Ladas. ( I used to drive one, comrade)
 
You'll get banned,for not agreeing with the bluemoon commie party line.That's how it works.If a Volga pulls up in front of your home.You will probably,never be seen again.
Ric the owner is a Lib Dem.
 
I like to go against the grain, what can I say.

what an attitude to display in public - can you imagine if everyone had the same attitude - someone you love collapses in the street you rush into the shop displaying the defibrillator sign and ask them to come outside with it and help and the assistance says "sorry can't do that without the shop manager Mr Grimsdale's permission and we can't get that as he has locked it up and taken the key with him on his cruise holiday....... its just the way he likes to roll "
 
what an attitude to display in public - can you imagine if everyone had the same attitude - someone you love collapses in the street you rush into the shop displaying the defibrillator sign and ask them to come outside with it and help and the assistance says "sorry can't do that without the shop manager Mr Grimsdale's permission and we can't get that as he has locked it up and taken the key with him on his cruise holiday....... its just the way he likes to roll "

It was a joke mate. How can you have a serious discussion on a topic like this when it's framed in the way the OP did? That's my point.

Just seems like an opportunity for people to pat each other on the back about how altruistic they are.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top