Media Thread - 2021/22

Status
Not open for further replies.
All the shite we endure through media outlets is a compliment , because we are getting up everbody's noses and when Kane signs on the dotted line , the negative bullshit will increase a few more notches.
Instead of getting annoyed with the vitriol we receive i am going to enjoy and embrace it , the pain we are causing the 'istree clubs and the hateful eight and the many others is glorious , they are just f8cking jealous and they all wish Sheik Mansour had chosen their football club.
 
Ahh good old Jürgen on sky sports when asked about ours and Chelsea's signings, "They have their way of doing things we have ours, we spend what we earn " Maybe we should get PB or somebody to explain ffp to him. Let's hope they crash and burn again.
Strange a man working for Americans not understanding the concept of PROFIT.
"......We spend some of what we earn, the rest disappears in a puff of yankee smoke."
 
The Athletic is nothing but a Dipper fanzine. I cancelled my subscription after the first 12 months. if I’d have wanted to read shite about them I’d have subscribed to the Anfield Wrap

Jack Pitt-Brooke, who was a City blogger before he became a journo, recently wrote that City don't want Kane enough because they're not just handing over a £160m straight fee. His evidence for this is that City were willing to spend £65m on a third choice centre back.

He meant Ruben Dias.
 
All the shite we endure through media outlets is a compliment , because we are getting up everbody's noses and when Kane signs on the dotted line , the negative bullshit will increase a few more notches.
Instead of getting annoyed with the vitriol we receive i am going to enjoy and embrace it , the pain we are causing the 'istree clubs and the hateful eight and the many others is glorious , they are just f8cking jealous and they all wish Sheik Mansour had chosen their football club.
Liverpool had their chance but David Moores turned him down. Not for altruistic reasons, but because he felt they should pay more.
Hicks and Gilette worked out so well, they came within a gnat's whisker of going under.
#thismeansarsesincharge.
 
There are plenty of them in the media but the Guardian is the home of people who are motivated by ideals and that's what makes them a relentless foe who will never ever give up.
Recent quote from a Grauniad article:
"They [Manchester City] were let off on a technicality by a corruptible body"
Yes Marvin, very idealistic, two lies in one sentence.
 
Arf! LoL!

The Journalists(?) at the Guardian who are stealing a living, over thinking too much again.

Another one with a very bad Tash. Is it a Tash thing?

Alex Ferguson and Manchester United weren't mentioned. They dominated the PL for 20 years by out spending every other club and buying the best players. Strange how the PL inequalities is now a problem, but it wasn't over those 20 years.

img]
 
Last edited:
All the shite we endure through media outlets is a compliment , because we are getting up everbody's noses and when Kane signs on the dotted line , the negative bullshit will increase a few more notches.
Instead of getting annoyed with the vitriol we receive i am going to enjoy and embrace it , the pain we are causing the 'istree clubs and the hateful eight and the many others is glorious , they are just f8cking jealous and they all wish Sheik Mansour had chosen their football club.
Every negative, vitriolic and slanderous word uttered about us further cements that the cartel of United and Liverpool are hurting and all the sycophants who hang on the cartel’s coat tails are hurting just as much.

I never want to be liked, I always want City to remain alternative or a sub-culture. If we ever become mainstream, or even worse part of the cartel (and we tried with the Super League, the daft fuckers!) my support for the club would decrease.
 
Speaking of bullshit, the BBC have run this load of utter shite


the Chelsea manager is surprised they are favourites to win the league, yep so is everyone else especially since they are most definitely not favourites with the bookies, so this pile of wank is that seven BBC pundits have tipped Chelsea to win the league, ok so Chelsea are favourites with BBC pundits? Well no, 13 have gone for City.

ok so wtf is this bullshit about? Make a story up and then peddle it.
Saw that this morning and thought wtf? Subjective in the extreme blowing smoke up Tommy's arse. Very poor, inaccurate article, the BBC has no shame.
 
Arf! LoL!

The Journalists(?) at the Guardian who are stealing a living, over thinking too much again.

Another one with a very bad Tash. Is it a Tash thing?

Alex Ferguson and Manchester United weren't mentioned. They dominated the PL for 20 years by out spending every other club and buying the best players. Strange how the PL inequalities is now a problem, but it wasn't over those 20 years.

img]
They really really don’t like us at the Grauniad. I reckon they’ve got dartboards with the Sheikh’s face on it all around their offices. Proper sad set of cunts at that paper!

They love United and Liverpool so much that despite being a paper that is supposed to be all for social justices, they are consistently racist towards Sheikh Mansour.

The Grauniad must be one of the most hypocritical companies in the country.
 
Arf! LoL!

The Journalists(?) at the Guardian who are stealing a living, over thinking too much again.

Another one with a very bad Tash. Is it a Tash thing?

Alex Ferguson and Manchester United weren't mentioned. They dominated the PL for 20 years by out spending every other club and buying the best players. Strange how the PL inequalities is now a problem, but it wasn't over those 20 years.

img]

I'm not going to read the article but it appears this buffoon is saying the club's who spend the most on transfers should be docked points?

Do people actually get paid to dream up and then write this utter tripe? Mind you looking at the new ffp rules being cooked up in Europe, there is something similar being planned, a luxury tax or some bollocks on transfers over an agreed amount.
 
Arf! LoL!

The Journalists(?) at the Guardian who are stealing a living, over thinking too much again.

Another one with a very bad Tash. Is it a Tash thing?

Alex Ferguson and Manchester United weren't mentioned. They dominated the PL for 20 years by out spending every other club and buying the best players. Strange how the PL inequalities is now a problem, but it wasn't over those 20 years.

img]
Strange how professional football inequalities are now a problem, but weren't over the last 132 years.
 
Arf! LoL!

The Journalists(?) at the Guardian who are stealing a living, over thinking too much again.

Another one with a very bad Tash. Is it a Tash thing?

Alex Ferguson and Manchester United weren't mentioned. They dominated the PL for 20 years by out spending every other club and buying the best players. Strange how the PL inequalities is now a problem, but it wasn't over those 20 years.

img]
Well tbh I would expect no less from the Guardian….
What a daft fucker you are Mr Doyle!
 
Every negative, vitriolic and slanderous word uttered about us further cements that the cartel of United and Liverpool are hurting and all the sycophants who hang on the cartel’s coat tails are hurting just as much.

I never want to be liked, I always want City to remain alternative or a sub-culture. If we ever become mainstream, or even worse part of the cartel (and we tried with the Super League, the daft fuckers!) my support for the club would decrease.
I don't want us to be liked either. I do want us and our achievements to be respected though. Might be wishful thinking.
 
I'm not going to read the article but it appears this buffoon is saying the club's who spend the most on transfers should be docked points?

Do people actually get paid to dream up and then write this utter tripe? Mind you looking at the new ffp rules being cooked up in Europe, there is something similar being planned, a luxury tax or some bollocks on transfers over an agreed amount.
And yet this summer we have a net spend of only about a third to what the Rags have spent but thats never mentioned
 
Arf! LoL!

The Journalists(?) at the Guardian who are stealing a living, over thinking too much again.

Another one with a very bad Tash. Is it a Tash thing?

Alex Ferguson and Manchester United weren't mentioned. They dominated the PL for 20 years by out spending every other club and buying the best players. Strange how the PL inequalities is now a problem, but it wasn't over those 20 years.

img]
Great idea could it be backdated to when we scraped 80 grand together for Andy Morrison and them bastard's spent 32 million on Wio
 
All the shite we endure through media outlets is a compliment , because we are getting up everbody's noses and when Kane signs on the dotted line , the negative bullshit will increase a few more notches.
Instead of getting annoyed with the vitriol we receive i am going to enjoy and embrace it , the pain we are causing the 'istree clubs and the hateful eight and the many others is glorious , they are just f8cking jealous and they all wish Sheik Mansour had chosen their football club.
Nail.On.Head.
 
Recent quote from a Grauniad article:
"They [Manchester City] were let off on a technicality by a corruptible body"
Yes Marvin, very idealistic, two lies in one sentence.
Does idealistic imply honesty?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top