Harry Kane

But then there's the obvious fact that he's not quite City standard (yet). Signing a player because they don't care what others think isn't reasonable either as a standalone.
Genuinely curious. Who in your opinion is city standard other than Kane and haaland.
 
Genuinely curious. Who in your opinion is city standard other than Kane and haaland.
Of the players that were available this summer, or playing at a club weak enough that we could force the issue:

Lukaku. That's it. He and the other two mentioned. All the others good enough wouldn't have been available to us. Admittedly I don't know every striker in Europe, but of the ones I've seen enough of to really rate those three stand way above the rest. If you count them as strikers then obviously Messi and Mbappé would be included too.



Calvert Lewin might be a very good player one day. I actually like him. But right now he's not top of Europe quality. And we're not in the market for potential this summer.
 
Next summer is too far away. We'll have to deal with the implications of what could happen over season if we fail to sign a 9 this window. And they're not minor implications, if last game was any indication.

I agree with you. The issue is we have no alternatives, it's Kane or bust and Kane has 3 years left on his deal and the window shuts in 2 weeks. The cards are simply not stacked in our favour. As much as I'd love a striker now, we decided to not pursue either Messi or Lukaku, this is the risk you run by only prioritising one striker who plays for a club not particularly willing to sell to a rival.

If the price of Kane is 150m+, I'd honestly want City to wait a year and make the smart choice not the desperate one.
 
Genuinely curious. Who in your opinion is city standard other than Kane and haaland.
You could put a cheeky £65M bid in for Son and have £85M to spend on a half useful left back….

seriously though keletchi, lacazette, aubamayang or even Dzeko would do a job for a year

which strikes me odd that ings wasn’t a short term alternative
 
This has more or less all been agreed. Fee, wages, the lot. Final bits will be getting done now and I reckon no later than Wednesday we will get the breaking news yellow ticker on Sky Sports news saying "City have record £140 million bid accepted" (even though we know this will include the add ons).
 
Aubameyang and Lacazette are both available for transfer I think, Aubameyang would be good for a season
I hope we get Kane but not at silly money. Aubameyang is 32 playing in a really poor Arsenal team and seems to have lost his desire to perform there. Arteta should have stayed at City until Pep left as the Arsenal project is beyond him.
The likes of Haaland and Mbappe are few and far between,superb forwards at a young age. If we dont get Harry, then I agree Aubameyang would be a better prospect for us than Cavani has been at United. As for comments about Delap being only 18. Haaland and Mbappe were given a chance at tender ages. If I remember Rashford was given a chance at the rags as at the time they were in dire straits with forwards.Edozie could equally be one of those who blossoms at an early age, much like Sancho.Some youngsters just click when given a chance.
 
The last 10 pages in here gone to complete shit.

We have people living in cuckoo land thinking Mbappe and Haaland would sign.

People suggesting Calvert Lewin..

Then someone who reckons Lacazette could do a job.

Seriously?
Yeah, Villa signing Ings has been a real dam busting moment for the forum.
 
The last 10 pages in here gone to complete shit.

We have people living in cuckoo land thinking Mbappe and Haaland would sign.

People suggesting Calvert Lewin..

Then someone who reckons Lacazette could do a job.

Seriously?
we are (quite maturely)discussing options if we fail to sign Kane. Sorry none of the back up options meet your approval. Should have checked with you before posting!
 
The last 10 pages in here gone to complete shit.

We have people living in cuckoo land thinking Mbappe and Haaland would sign.

People suggesting Calvert Lewin..

Then someone who reckons Lacazette could do a job.

Seriously?
Lacazette would do a better job as a central striker than any player we have and he's obtainable. Haaland, Mbappe, DCL are not.
 
The last 10 pages in here gone to complete shit.

We have people living in cuckoo land thinking Mbappe and Haaland would sign.

People suggesting Calvert Lewin..

Then someone who reckons Lacazette could do a job.

Seriously?
PhonyWastefulInganue-max-1mb.gif


Ignore that this was modified for American baseball lol
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top