Epstein / Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor / Maxwell

  • Thread starter Thread starter mat
  • Start date Start date
denislawsbackheel said:
Quite.
Any benefit he might have been given after the interview is now long gone.
Click to expand...
Have you actually seen the interview? Anyone giving him the benefit after watching that needs to invest in this amazing Nigerian time share I’ve got available.
 
Perhaps English isn’t your first language and your comprehension is limited. Of course I have and I didn’t believe a word of it but many people at the time accepted his opinion. He still has a team claiming the picture of him and her was photoshopped and people believing it.
In the same way there are people who are gullibly accepting that Charles isn’t up to his eyes in graft and corruption as his people tout access to him for money from Arab and Russian crooks.
 
denislawsbackheel said:
Of course I have and many people at the time accepted his opinion. He still has a team claiming the picture of him and her was photoshopped and people believing it.
In the same way there are people who are gullibly accepting that Charles isn’t up to his eyes in graft and corruption as his people tout access to him for money from Arab and Russian crooks.
Click to expand...
Are you aware of the ‘Reply’ facility and the benefits it can provide?

Presumably you meant word, rather than opinion. Saying you’ve never met someone isn’t an expression of opinion, it is an assertion of something you claim to be true.

Anyone who accepts his word on that assertion is a fucking gullible moron whose judgement is worthless.
 
Uncle Wally One Ball said:
The civil case she is bringing states:
Giuffre “was compelled by express or implied threats by Jeffrey Epstein, Maxwell, and/or Prince Andrew to engage in sexual acts with Prince Andrew, and feared death or physical injury to herself or another and other repercussions for disobeying Epstein, Maxwell, and Prince Andrew due to their powerful connections, wealth and authority”.

If you think a judge in a claim for cash is going to believe that, you will believe anything.
Click to expand...
She was trafficked, you do understand what that means ?

You have been on the job too long wally
 
denislawsbackheel said:
Perhaps English isn’t your first language and your comprehension is limited.
Click to expand...
Just noticed you added this in after I had replied - and now I understand why you don’t quote other posters - because you are a spineless ****.

And fwiw, I am very well rewarded for my ability to comprehend and communicate in English. Are you?
 
denislawsbackheel said:
Perhaps English isn’t your first language and your comprehension is limited. Of course I have and I didn’t believe a word of it but many people at the time accepted his opinion. He still has a team claiming the picture of him and her was photoshopped and people believing it.
In the same way there are people who are gullibly accepting that Charles isn’t up to his eyes in graft and corruption as his people tout access to him for money from Arab and Russian crooks.
Click to expand...

Pretty sure you'll be out of your depth here Den.
 
Things that are clear.


Young impressionable women were purposely forced/co-earsed/trafficked inti the sex trade by epstein and his team

Prince andrew, his friend took advantage of thus business and knew (and probably used) these women with full knowledge they were victims.

Andrew (doesn't deserve the prince title) is a **** and awrong un.
His mam isn't fit to sit on the throne if she carries on protecting him.
 
ancoats said:
untouchable and we know what will happen ? nothing
Click to expand...
I fear you may be correct.
But what's to be done then?
We cant just lynch the bloke cos we think he's a nonce, as many seem to want to.
Her legal team have served papers to the best of their ability.
So what happens now?
He ignores, fails to attend and she gets damages which he will pay, one way or another, and is deemed guilty by default, which he wont want, but wont really affect him, as he's as thick as mince anyway.
He responds and goes to court (no chance)
He will be thinking he's done nothing wrong, burying his head in the sand hoping his legal team will get him out of it.
He will never be tried, so i'm sure he will sleep easy at night knowing he's got away with it (if he's guilty)
People like him have no consience. Self entitled wanker born into a world where the plebs like us are seen as worthless scum.
This is the side of royalty I hate.
I love the queen and how she has served the country all these years with dignity, she doesn't deserve this shit as she approaches her twilight years.
I hope he gets what he deserves.
 
urban genie said:
Things that are clear.


Young impressionable women were purposely forced/co-earsed/trafficked inti the sex trade by epstein and his team

Prince andrew, his friend took advantage of thus business and knew (and probably used) these women with full knowledge they were victims.

Andrew (doesn't deserve the prince title) is a **** and awrong un.
His mam isn't fit to sit on the throne if she carries on protecting him.
Click to expand...

Girls. Vast majority were under 18, some as young as 12.
 
He isn't legally obliged to attend the hearing in person, but he needs to send his American qualified lawyers to attend on his behalf.
 
crublue1 said:
I fear you may be correct.
But what's to be done then?
We cant just lynch the bloke cos we think he's a nonce, as many seem to want to.
Her legal team have served papers to the best of their ability.
So what happens now?
He ignores, fails to attend and she gets damages which he will pay, one way or another, and is deemed guilty by default, which he wont want, but wont really affect him, as he's as thick as mince anyway.
He responds and goes to court (no chance)
He will be thinking he's done nothing wrong, burying his head in the sand hoping his legal team will get him out of it.
He will never be tried, so i'm sure he will sleep easy at night knowing he's got away with it (if he's guilty)
People like him have no consience. Self entitled wanker born into a world where the plebs like us are seen as worthless scum.
This is the side of royalty I hate.
I love the queen and how she has served the country all these years with dignity, she doesn't deserve this shit as she approaches her twilight years.
I hope he gets what he deserves.
Click to expand...
Do you think the royal family will see a downturn in support in the decades?

Seems like when the Queens reputation is strongly based on how young she took the thrown. After it's probably just gonna be ageing rich folk without a genuine connection/mythology handing the crown to each other.
 
Whatever the outcome, the Royal Family’s reputation has suffered a serious kicking. The guy’s famous for being a freeloader, opportunist and all-round cnut. He may be an extreme example of the species but there are other skeletons in cupboards.
 
BlueBlood84 said:
Do you think the royal family will see a downturn in support in the decades?

Seems like when the Queens reputation is strongly based on how young she took the thrown. After it's probably just gonna be ageing rich folk without a genuine connection/mythology handing the crown to each other.
Click to expand...
As an institution it's pretty much untouchable. They cant just be voted out. All we ask is that they do the duties bestowed on them with dignity and honour.
You cant say that for some of them, but they are human, they make mistakes.
I'm not a staunch royalist, nor am I against them.
I respect the queen immensely, I believe she has always had the country as her no.1 priority.
I dont really see the need for all the residences and the 1000's of acres at balmoral, but hey, it goes with the job. Compared to say, Henry the eighth for instance, qe2 is quite modest in her expenditure.
She's been our finest monarch in my opinion.
As for your first question, no, the young people I deal with seem to love the monarchy, not sure if this is typical though.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top