The winter of discontent

They aint driving less, they're just filling up with £3 of petrol when they can.
Some are, talking to my brother in the UK about it yesterday.
He's going to cycle to work, saving his tank full of petrol for emergencies.
I told him he should do this permanently, he said he might just do that. Not only to save money but to improve his health.
So, there you go, there are benefits to a petrol shortage.
 
What changes would you advocate to replace capitalism ?
It's the neoliberal version of capitalism that's failing, one favoured by economists like Hayek and Friedman, and that came to prominence in the early 80's thanks to Reagan and Thatcher (the latter was famously entranced by Hayek's The Constitution of Liberty). Even someone like Adam Smith would disapprove of this version of capitalism on steroids, which basically amounts to policies of deregulation and what Arundhati Roy once aptly described as 'the privatization of everything'.

A return to a Keynesian, more regulated version of capitalism is possibly what is required - though even that may not be unsuited to deal with climate change.

For more on this, read one or more of the following (both are highly accessible introductory texts):

Ha Joon Chang - 23 Things They Don't Tell You About Capitalism
Manfred Steger and Ravi Roy Neoliberalism - A Very Short Introduction

The historical background may also be of some relevance:

Chang basically demonstrates in his writing that economic growth in the advanced capitalist countries has actually been lower over the last 40 years (when various versions of free market capitalism have held sway: Thatcherism, 'Trickle-down' Reaganomics, Clinton's Market Globalism and Tony Blair's Third Way) than it ever was between 1950 and 1970 (when 'socialist' Keynesian economics ruled the roost), or even during the previous 'winter of discontent' and the late 70's period of stagflation which resulted in the monetarist policies of Friedman and Hayek getting adopted.

Let’s run with an example: Thatcher got elected on the back of the Saatchi slogan 'Labour Isn't Working'. This is because there was, at that time, one million unemployed in the UK. For Friedman and Hayek, the focus of macreconomic theory should be on controlling inflation. So Thatcher raised interest rates. This should lower demand as it then costs more to borrow money. Unfortunately, those higher interest rates attracted foreign capital, driving up the value of the British pound and making British exports uncompetitive.

The result was a huge recession. Unemployment soared to 3.3 million people, a significant chunk of British manufacturing was destroyed, and many traditional industrial centres were devastated.

Reaganomics didn't work either. As in the UK, interest rates were jacked up in an attempt to reduce inflation. Between 1979 and 1981, interest rates more than doubled from around 10% to over 20% per year. A significant proportion of the US manufacturing industry, which had already been losing ground to Japanese and other foreign competition, could not withstand such an increase in financial costs. The traditional industrial heartland in the Midwest was turned into 'the Rust Belt'.

Neoliberals subscribe to what is known as the D-L-P formula (De-regulation of the economy, Liberalisation of trade and industry, Privatisation of state owned enterprises). Financial deregulation in the US at this time laid the foundation for the unstable and morally egregious financial system we have today, which involves hostile takeovers, asset stripping, and so on. To avoid this fate, firms at the time of Reagan had to deliver profits faster than before, otherwise impatient shareholders would sell up, reducing the share prices and thus exposing the firm to a greater danger of takeover. The easiest way for a company to deal with this was through downsizing, reducing the workforce, cutting overheads and minimizing investments, even though these actions diminish the competitiveness of the business in the longer term.

Here's a damning statistic from Chang: '...distributed profits as a share of total US corporate profits stood at 35-45 per cent between the 1950's and 1970's. Between 2001 and 2010, the largest US companies distributed 94% of their profits [to shareholders] and the top UK companies 89% of their profits.'

And here's another: '...in the UK, the average period of shareholding, which had already fallen from 5 years in the mid 1960's to two years in the 1980's, plummeted to about 7.5 months at the end of 2007.'

The D-L-P formula has also proved disastrous for developing economies too. One of the latest examples is India (often held up as a neoliberal economic success story) where 250,000 farmers have committed suicide because of it. For the back story on that, read Arundhati Roy's Capitalism: A Ghost Story.

Let's also consider the instability of the financial markets that has been a consequence of the deregulation of them.

Start of 1990's - banking crises in Sweden, Finland and Norway
1994/95 - 'Tequila' crisis in Mexico
1997 - crises in 'miracle' economies in Thailand, Indonesia, Malaysia and South Korea
1998 - Russian crisis
1999 - Brazilian crisis
2002 - Argentina
2008 - We all know about that one

Virtually no country was in banking crisis between the end of the Second World War and the mid-1970's, when the financial sector was more regulated. Between the mid-1970's and the late 1980's, the proportion of countries who experienced a banking crisis rose to 5 to 10%, weighted by their share of world income. The proportion then shot up to around 20% in the mid-1990's. The ratio then briefly fell to zero for a few years in the mid-2000s, but went up again to 35% following the 2008 global financial crisis.

In summary, the present 'winter of discontent' has to be understood in the above context. It's been coming for a while. Brexit might also be partly seen as a reaction against neoliberalism, which requires the free movement of labour across borders.

Note that I have only looked at the emergence of our present problems purely from a macroeconomic perspective in this post and not considered the impact of Covid-19 . So its explanatory power is limited. But it is a piece of the jigsaw puzzle.

As for the selfish behaviour of people in the pandemic, it is worth noting that neoliberalism is also predicated on a flawed model of human beings as rationally self-interested creatures, one which has been conclusively demonstrated to be false in subsequent multidisciplinary research. For more on that, see Matthieu Ricard's book on Altruism.
 
Last edited:
Its been a while since I last posted, but here goes.

There seems to be a political storm brewing and lets be frank about this a large chunk of it is our own making Brexit, voting in a hard right populist government. But I'm not really old enough to remember this but it appear that we are heading for another winter of discontent just like we had in the late 70's a fuel crisis, rising inflation, bins not been emptied shortage of food on the supermarket shelves, shortages in pubs and restaurants, and now shortages at the petrol pumps.
Where does this all end because it certainly bears all the hallmark's of those dark day's. I'm just waiting for Boris to pop out and utter those immortal words 'Crisis, what crisis'

Fewer fossil fuels being used
Less shit for people to shovel in their fat unhealthy mouths
People will throw less food away that shouldn’t be thrown away yet
People might learn to batch cook healthy meals that can be frozen for another day
People working fewer hours and shorter weeks and continuing to work from home means they will spend more time with their families
People learning the value of money a bit more as we’ve got to keep an eye on things so don’t just waste or piss their money away

Take the positives out of every situation!
 
It's the neoliberal version of capitalism that's failing, one favoured by economists like Hayek and Friedman, and that came to prominence in the early 80's thanks to Reagan and Thatcher (the latter was famously entranced by Hayek's The Constitution of Liberty). Even someone like Adam Smith would disapprove of this version of capitalism on steroids, which basically amounts to policies of deregulation and what Arundhati Roy once aptly described as 'the privatization of everything'.

A return to a Keynesian, more regulated version of capitalism is possibly what is required - though even that may not be unsuited to deal with climate change.

For more on this, read one or more of the following (both are highly accessible introductory texts):

Ha Joon Chang - 23 Things They Don't Tell You About Capitalism
Manfred Steger and Ravi Roy Neoliberalism - A Very Short Introduction

The historical background may also be of some relevance:

Chang basically demonstrates in his writing that economic growth in the advanced capitalist countries has actually been lower over the last 40 years (when various versions of free market capitalism have held sway: Thatcherism, 'Trickle-down' Reaganomics, Clinton's Market Globalism and Tony Blair's Third Way) than it ever was between 1950 and 1970 (when 'socialist' Keynesian economics ruled the roost), or even during the previous 'winter of discontent' and the late 70's period of stagflation which resulted in the monetarist policies of Friedman and Hayek getting adopted.

Let’s run with an example: Thatcher got elected on the back of the Saatchi slogan 'Labour Isn't Working'. This is because there was, at that time, one million unemployed in the UK. For Friedman and Hayek, the focus of macreconomic theory should be on controlling inflation. So Thatcher raised interest rates. This should lower demand as it then costs more to borrow money. Unfortunately, those higher interest rates attracted foreign capital, driving up the value of the British pound and making British exports uncompetitive.

The result was a huge recession. Unemployment soared to 3.3 million people, a significant chunk of British manufacturing was destroyed, and many traditional industrial centres were devastated.

Reaganomics didn't work either. As in the UK, interest rates were jacked up in an attempt to reduce inflation. Between 1979 and 1981, interest rates more than doubled from around 10% to over 20% per year. A significant proportion of the US manufacturing industry, which had already been losing ground to Japanese and other foreign competition, could not withstand such an increase in financial costs. The traditional industrial heartland in the Midwest was turned into 'the Rust Belt'.

Neoliberals subscribe to what is known as the D-L-P formula (De-regulation of the economy, Liberalisation of trade and industry, Privatisation of state owned enterprises). Financial deregulation in the US at this time laid the foundation for the unstable and morally egregious financial system we have today, which involves hostile takeovers, asset stripping, and so on. To avoid this fate, firms at the time of Reagan had to deliver profits faster than before, otherwise impatient shareholders would sell up, reducing the share prices and thus exposing the firm to a greater danger of takeover. The easiest way for a company to deal with this was through downsizing, reducing the workforce, cutting overheads and minimizing investments, even though these actions diminish the competitiveness of the business in the longer term.

Here's a damning statistic from Chang: '...distributed profits as a share of total US corporate profits stood at 35-45 per cent between the 1950's and 1970's. Between 2001 and 2010, the largest US companies distributed 94% of their profits [to shareholders] and the top UK companies 89% of their profits.'

And here's another: '...in the UK, the average period of shareholding, which had already fallen from 5 years in the mid 1960's to two years in the 1980's, plummeted to about 7.5 months at the end of 2007.'

The D-L-P formula has also proved disastrous for developing economies too. One of the latest examples is India (often held up as a neoliberal economic success story) where 250,000 farmers have committed suicide because of it. For the back story on that, read Arundhati Roy's Capitalism: A Ghost Story.

Let's also consider the instability of the financial markets that has been a consequence of the deregulation of them.

Start of 1990's - banking crises in Sweden, Finland and Norway
1994/95 - 'Tequila' crisis in Mexico
1997 - crises in 'miracle' economies in Thailand, Indonesia, Malaysia and South Korea
1998 - Russian crisis
1999 - Brazilian crisis
2002 - Argentina
2008 - We all know about that one

Virtually no country was in banking crisis between the end of the Second World War and the mid-1970's, when the financial sector was more regulated. Between the mid-1970's and the late 1980's, the proportion of countries who experienced a banking crisis rose to 5 to 10%, weighted by their share of world income. The proportion then shot up to around 20% in the mid-1990's. The ratio then briefly fell to zero for a few years in the mid-2000s, but went up again to 35% following the 2008 global financial crisis.

In summary, the present 'winter of discontent' has to be understood in the above context. It's been coming for a while. Brexit might also be partly seen as a reaction against neoliberalism, which requires the free movement of labour across borders.

Note that I have only looked at the emergence of our present problems purely from a macroeconomic perspective in this post and not considered the impact of Covid-19 . So its explanatory power is limited. But it is a piece of the jigsaw puzzle.

As for the selfish behaviour of people in the pandemic, it is worth noting that neoliberalism is also predicated on a flawed model of human beings as rationally self-interested creatures, one which has been conclusively demonstrated to be false in subsequent multidisciplinary research. For more on that, see Matthieu Ricard's book on Altruism.
Nice one, Zen. Top post. If I ever get time I’ll look up those recommendations!
 
Fewer fossil fuels being used
Less shit for people to shovel in their fat unhealthy mouths
People will throw less food away that shouldn’t be thrown away yet
People might learn to batch cook healthy meals that can be frozen for another day
People working fewer hours and shorter weeks and continuing to work from home means they will spend more time with their families
People learning the value of money a bit more as we’ve got to keep an eye on things so don’t just waste or piss their money away

Take the positives out of every situation!
Should we be thanking the government for making us poorer so we can do all those things?
 
I don't recall 78/79 winter as being that bad tbh, there were no rotating power cuts for starters as in 72 and 74 - they really bring it home to people that there are severe problems. Even allowing for all the various issues in the 70s, including periods where inflation was over 20%, I was never as financially impacted then as I was by the 2008 credit crunch.
 
Should we be thanking the government for making us poorer so we can do all those things?
Once money comes out of enough peoples pockets governments fall, this chaos,if we are so weak that we think that this is what this is, will hopefully bring that benefit. If austerity, brexit,covid, Syria, grenfell etc cant get rid of the fuckers then we will have to hope peoples need for materialism and hatred of inconvenience will.

You can’t get meaningful change without some turmoil. Unfortunately I think we will moan our way through it and normal service will be resumed. And we will have no one else to blame but ourselves.
 
Just has to share this article some of the comments particular those direct from a Polish lorry driver

Bonehead policies

This is an absolute beauty
Speaking from behind the wheel of his red lorry in Poland’s capital Warsaw, he said: “No thank you, Mr Prime Minister, I will not take advantage of this opportunity. No drivers want to move for only three months just to make it easier for the British to organise their holidays.”
 
Getting it on the news over here too.
The Polish guy saying your attitudes towards East European workers needs to change before anyone goes back.
Meanwhile it’s being reported that the latest thing to run out at some petrol stations is the signs saying no petrol.
Fake news. The Dad’s Army spirit is alive and well.
5061AD2D-0BE2-47B1-92C6-EA0E561C2860.jpeg
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top