crazyg
Well-Known Member
Oh,I don't know.The 14th century in general was pretty grim tbh.
We won the battle of Crécy-en-Ponthieu in 1346, beating the French on their own ground.
Pity we couldn't do it this week, though.
Oh,I don't know.The 14th century in general was pretty grim tbh.
VAR later ruled Edward III offside and that longbows broke FFP unfortunately.Oh,I don't know.
We won the battle of Crécy-en-Ponthieu in 1346, beating the French on their own ground.
Pity we couldn't do it this week, though.
VAR was overturned following an appeal to CAS, and it's still recorded in the history books as an away win.VAR later ruled Edward III offside and that longbows broke FFP unfortunately.
I got pulled up on here once for spelling it Azincourt.VAR was overturned following an appeal to CAS, and it's still recorded in the history books as an away win.
The French have never forgiven us for that, calling us Perfidious Albion. A few years later, the French tried to get the game replayed on a neutral ground about 30 miles north, but it didn't go well either.
The nearest village to the pitch had the name of Azincourt, but the Sun reporter miss-spelled it by calling it Agincourt.
The rest is history.
It is the correct spelling. I've been there 2 or 3 times and holidayed in the area. The museum in the village is well worth a visit.I got pulled up on here once for spelling it Azincourt.
Driven through it on my way south a few times and yes well worth stopping off, loads of history around there.It is the correct spelling. I've been there 2 or 3 times and holidayed in the area. The museum in the village is well worth a visit.
Agreed. Love the area.Driven through it on my way south a few times and yes well worth stopping off, loads of history around there.
That article demonstrates the short sightedness of successive governments who have based the UK's energy policy on the continued availability of cheap imported gas. They should have recognised that having a sovereign source of energy is a strategic requirement, and instead of investing more in nuclear and fracking we've been happy to keep buying cheap gas and reducing our storage capacity. The most recent nuclear power station came on line over 25 years ago, and within 3 years over half our nuclear generating capacity is scheduled for decommissioning putting an even bigger reliance on renewables and gas. The government has also given in to the NIMBYs by not allowing for any significant commercial development of fracking sites. We all know that long term, renewable sources are the way ahead but we're decades away from renewables completely superseding everything else, so in the meantime we need to become less reliant on imports where we are competing for scarce resources and are at the mercy of the foreign policy of hostile governments, in particular Russia. At this rate we'll be forced into reopening mothballed coal fired power stations to keep the lights on.When writing this article with half tongue in cheek the other half looking for a reaction, not realising how bad this really is. Great article in the FT today that lays bare the issues the country. Further backed up by an interview this morning on R4 with an academic who's written another paper to the government to ignore. The professors take was quite interesting on how over the last decade poor planning on decarbonising has left us exposed.
Loads of interviews with industries relying on gas heavily to make their products. Anyone would think that with such a crisis we'd have out leader stepping in cracking heads together (as was said on R4) not off on a jolly sunning himself and his new Mrs. ) Maybe he'll they can do a group whatsapp call or something, like you do.
I'm really hoping that you don't regret those words, but its not looking to rosie right now,Won’t happen
I'm really hoping that you don't regret those words, but its not looking to rosie right now,
Shale gas was always a none starter we are a small densely populated island and there were significant issues extracting this safely (this was alluded too on R4). I'm no expert on this but we need a long term plan a strategy that takes into the next 10, 25 and 50 years.That article demonstrates the short sightedness of successive governments who have based the UK's energy policy on the continued availability of cheap imported gas. They should have recognised that having a sovereign source of energy is a strategic requirement, and instead of investing more in nuclear and fracking we've been happy to keep buying cheap gas and reducing our storage capacity. The most recent nuclear power station came on line over 25 years ago, and within 3 years over half our nuclear generating capacity is scheduled for decommissioning putting an even bigger reliance on renewables and gas. The government has also given in to the NIMBYs by not allowing for any significant commercial development of fracking sites. We all know that long term, renewable sources are the way ahead but we're decades away from renewables completely superseding everything else, so in the meantime we need to become less reliant on imports where we are competing for scarce resources and are at the mercy of the foreign policy of hostile governments, in particular Russia. At this rate we'll be forced into reopening mothballed coal fired power stations to keep the lights on.
The main failure of successive governments has been in not replacing and expanding the UK's nuclear generating capacity, which has got to be a long term key part of the low carbon energy mix.Shale gas was always a none starter we are a small densely populated island and there were significant issues extracting this safely (this was alluded too on R4). I'm no expert on this but we need a long term plan a strategy that takes into the next 10, 25 and 50 years.
To add to China’s problems. Difficult to asses what the knock on effect of China’s problems will be in Europe. But this on top of Covid (and for us Brexit) can’t help. Strengthens the case for regionalisation and Europe on-shoring key industries.
Your opinion but clearly not what the experts are saying, that its not financially viable due to the issues surrounding its extraction. If it had been do you not think that Cameron would have filled his boots and probably be on the board or directors alongside Clegg as a NED collecting a tidy sum?The main failure of successive governments has been in not replacing and expanding the UK's nuclear generating capacity, which has got to be a long term key part of the low carbon energy mix.
I'm not convinced shale is a non-starter. There are large areas of the country with significant shale gas reserves which could have alleviated the current crisis somewhat if planning authorities had allowed for commercial scale extraction. There are lots of environmental implications but the rules in this country are much more stringent than in the US.
I think fracking sites were mostly in rural Tory constituencies which contributed to the 2019 moratorium. Compared to the price of gas as of a few months ago it was probably deemed uneconomic which made the decision easier, even though it put our energy supplies at risk; a risk that now looks like it might be realised. Now that the price of gas is unlikely to come down to anywhere near previous levels and its long term availability is in question, it's probably worth revisiting shale as a potential medium term solution until renewables and nuclear can fill the gap.Your opinion but clearly not what the experts are saying, that its not financially viable due to the issues surrounding its extraction. If it had been do you not think that Cameron would have filled his boots and probably be on the board or directors alongside Clegg as a NED collecting a tidy sum?